Zain and Yanni series was very entertaining. I thought Yanni had the edge going in but Zain stepped up big time. I was rooting for Bo and it was kinda eerie not seeing him have his way for once. As for Steveson, I have always been glad to see him lose. He conducts himself on the mat like an ass. He tried to bring his antics into the RAC and got sent on his way. World class talent with a bratty, teenage mentality. His conditioning AND his attitude need improvement before he can be king of the hill.
Agree on all counts. I'll save the controversial one for last...
J'Den knows how to get it done. He's been training freestyle exclusively for four or five years, plus Bo came in 10 pounds light. Give him another year of exclusively freestyle. plus come in at weight, and I think it will be a different ballgame.
Steveson has been beaten a lot recently, yet he still can't get his emotions under control. It appeared that he was even yapping after he lost the second one last night, to the point where Gwiz (someone who is respected widely) said something to Gable's corner. I don't know if his coaches talk to him about it or not, but as long as he doesn't get it under control, I'm happy to see him lose.
Zain and Yianni...A lot of credit has to go to Cael and Co. for the change to his gameplan. Much better positional awareness through the takedowns last night, and maybe more importantly, more aware of Yianni's position and Zain avoiding Yianni's strong suits.
Now, here are the two sides to the controversy...
1. Most people are complaining that the review went back 45 seconds, and there's a rule that says the coach has 5 seconds to throw the brick, and you can't throw the brick after the whistle, unless there is a scoring change at the whistle. Okay.
2. There is also a rule that says the referee, and the judge have to agree on a call, and the Mat chair can't independently make a scoring change. If there is a discrepancy, the three have to figure it out, together. In this case, ref went 2 blue, judge went 2 red, and chair went 2 and 2. That's against the rules.
So, what is happening is people are biasing their arguments, based on the rule they like. Of course, I have my bias, but have also stated that I won't be surprised if there's a bumper match. Anyone that declares this clear cut either way is letting whatever bias they have cloud their judgement, IMO.
A third match last night would have been fire! I'd pay to just watch the two of them practice together.