Well it was substantial enough that your cesspool school paid compensation to the victims.Or with those who can't substantiate their fabrications and hate.
Well it was substantial enough that your cesspool school paid compensation to the victims.Or with those who can't substantiate their fabrications and hate.
Well it was substantial enough that your cesspool school paid compensation to the victims.
Penn St covered up Sandusky's actions for years and that was proven.Or with those who can't substantiate their fabrications and hate.
Penn St covered up Sandusky's actions for years and that was proven.
Cult members like you and Cheesesteak refuse to admit the truth and that's why talk about
the cover-up will never end.
Even the PSU FB HC admitted Penn St covered up for Sandusky40 years ago.
http://wnep.com/2012/09/21/entire-sandusky-trial-transcript-releasedLink the proof and evidence.
I can't wait to see it.
The cult is just doing what Paterno did for 40 years. When it comes to the dozens of children who were raped over a decades, just lie your ass off. They just have no self respect as human beings.
Let's say for a moment that no one knew in the 1970's. Let's say for a moment Joe Paterno never really knew the extent of what JS was doing at any time. Although not convicted, there was enough smoke after the 1998 accusations that university leadership should have corroborated "maybe it's a good idea that we don't keep this Sandusky guy around". Now, the guy does your administration a solid and RETIRES supposedly by his own volition after the '99 season. And then the 2001 shower incident happens which now really has to raise some red flags. So tell me this...why did the administration and Joe Paterno (who I'm sure now knew something was off with this fella, even if not EXACTLY what and we know he didn't like him personally) allow him to hang around your facilities for the next 10 years? There really is no good answer to this question and that is why your university leadership is garbage. Commence with clearing Paterno's good name, no one cares about your dead football coach except you. The fact that nut Anthony Lubrano's wife left him over his quixotic mission to redeem Paterno embodies how pathetic all of you look who still defend him to to your deaths. He's dead and it's just a game. Let it go. There are truly more significant issues facing this nation at the moment than Joe Paterno's good name and his football game victory totals.
Let's say for a moment that no one knew in the 1970's. Let's say for a moment Joe Paterno never really knew the extent of what JS was doing at any time. Although not convicted, there was enough smoke after the 1998 accusations that university leadership should have corroborated "maybe it's a good idea that we don't keep this Sandusky guy around". Now, the guy does your administration a solid and RETIRES supposedly by his own volition after the '99 season. And then the 2001 shower incident happens which now really has to raise some red flags. So tell me this...why did the administration and Joe Paterno (who I'm sure now knew something was off with this fella, even if not EXACTLY what and we know he didn't like him personally) allow him to hang around your facilities for the next 10 years? There really is no good answer to this question and that is why your university leadership is garbage. Commence with clearing Paterno's good name, no one cares about your dead football coach except you. The fact that nut Anthony Lubrano's wife left him over his quixotic mission to redeem Paterno embodies how pathetic all of you look who still defend him to to your deaths. He's dead and it's just a game. Let it go. There are truly more significant issues facing this nation at the moment than Joe Paterno's good name and his football game victory totals.
There is nothing but lying BS Paterno or PSU did anything wrong.
Or do you have the evidence?
Link it.
Not convicted in 98? He wasn't even charged. One of many failures by the state of Pennsylvania.
Retires supposedly on his own volition? Even your boy Freeh says his retirement was legit and not forced.
Not so fast there Cheesesteak, don’t forget the Penn St campus police were in charge of that investigation in 1998Not convicted in 98? He wasn't even charged. One of many failures by the state of Pennsylvania.
Retires supposedly on his own volition? Even your boy Freeh says his retirement was legit and not forced.
Not a word of truth in your drivel.
I know one thing.
When a coach uses excuses for every aspect of his program. Whether its recruiting or winning on the field. Never do they become good coaches. Franklin is a joke among other coaches around the country. Just like the university he represents.
Oh forgot to say. Franklin has done more negative recruiting than any coach around. You don't see other coaches crying like he does. Its comical in central Pa
I have to remember the next time I criticize the PSU fan base for denying facts on Sandusky and JoPa, the coaching staff swims in the same bs.Per nj.com quote article, Franklin says the Sandusky stuff is "things that you, your staff, your players have nothing to do with and happened over 40 years ago."
So, as a person very close to the "inside info", as the most recognizable face and leader of your "ridiculed" program....umm, so you're admitting it happened 40 years ago?
Anybody else able to confirm he really said this? Lol!!
http://www.nj.com/rutgersfootball/i...tes_around_league_on_big_ten_media_day.html#4
Penn St covered up Sandusky's actions for years and that was proven.
Cult members like you and Cheesesteak refuse to admit the truth and that's why talk about
the cover-up will never end.
Even the PSU FB HC admitted Penn St covered up for Sandusky40 years ago.
Link the proof and evidence.
I can't wait to see it.
Consider the mole whacked!In his defense, cheesteak has rational conversations on non-sodomy threads and however wrong, he is making a detailed case here for what he believes in.
The other guy is clearly just trolling and using a new account because the mods probably banned the old one. It's like whack-a-mole.
Show us evidence of where the "rapes" happened.
Was no one raped by Sandusky?
Do you belong to NAMBLA or something?
Are you really saying no one was "raped".. just to defend your position in saying Penn State / JoePA did nothing wrong?
Can you at least join the human race here and admit that you can see why people might think JoePA knew something or think that Penn State looked the other way? Or do you think we are all out to get you and are all disingenuous when we suggest something nefarious was going on somewhere there?
Here is your evidence - he was convicted by a jury after a trial, with evidence "beyond a reasonable doubt." These are the counts he was convicted of.
In case you were wondering, in Pennsylvania, Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse(IDSI) is defined as a person engaging in deviate sexual intercourse with a complainant by forcible compulsion. The complainant can be either a male or a female. IDSI differs from rape by encompassing more sex acts, including penetration with foreign objects or sex with an animal.
Another Felony 1(and 3) he was convicted of, unlawful contact with a minor, in Pennsylvania, is when a person intentionally contacts a minor to try to meet them for a sexual act as defined in the statutes.
If you still are defending this disgusting sub-human, I hope you rot in hell along with him.
Sandusky Verdict:
Victim 1
Count 1 - guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 2 - guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 3 - guilty: Indecent Assault (Felony 3)
Count 4 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 1)
Count 5 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 6 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Felony 3)
Victim 2
Count 7 - not guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 8 - guilty: Indecent Assault (Misdemeanor 2)
Count 9 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 1)
Count 10 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 11 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Misdemeanor 1)
Victim 3
Count 12 - guilty: Indecent Assault (Misdemeanor 2)
Count 13 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 3)
Count 14 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 15 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Felony 3)
Victim 4
Count 16 - ****DROPPED****: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 17 - guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 18 - ****DROPPED*****: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 19 - ****DROPPED*****: Aggravated Indecent Assault (Felony 2)
Count 20 - guilty: Indecent Assault (Misdemeanor 2)
Count 21 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 1)
Count 22 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 23 - guilty" Endangering Welfare of Children (Felony 3)
Victim 5
Count 24 - not guilty: Indecent Assault (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 25 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 3)
Count 26 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 27 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Felony 3)
Victim 6
Count 28 - not guilty: Indecent Assault (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 29 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 3)
Count 30 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 31 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Misdemeanor 1)
Victim 7
Count 32 - guilty: Criminal Attempt to Commit Indecent Assault (Misdemeanor 2)
Count 33 - ****DROPPED****: WITHDRAWN BY PROSECUTORS (unlawful contact with minors)
Count 34 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 35 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Misdemeanor 1)
Victim 8
Count 36 - guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 37 - guilty: Indecent Assault (Misdemeanor 2)
Count 38 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 1)
Count 39 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 40 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Misdemeanor 1)
(Due to 2nd indictment, counts start over with Victims 9 and 10)
Victim 9
Count 1 - guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 2 - guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 3 - guilty: Indecent Assault (Felony 3)
Count 4 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 1)
Count 5 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 6 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Felony 3)
Victim 10
Count 7 - guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 8 - guilty: Involuntary Deviate Sexual Intercourse (Felony 1)
Count 9 - guilty: Indecent Assault (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 10 - guilty: Unlawful Contact with Minors (Felony 1)
Count 11 - guilty: Corruption of Minors (Misdemeanor 1)
Count 12 - guilty: Endangering Welfare of Children (Felony 3)
Biacto doesn't seem to get it. This last post on Saturday give the result of all the evidence,
BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. Get in now, Einstein?