So, who is the problem?He isnt the problem but he's been made out to be the scapegoat
But she isn't sitting on the sidelines.its the one sitting on the sidelines,
I don't see why not, permant HCs have and Vivian don't have a say in the matter , since her leave of absence is supposed to forbid her to have anything to do with the program while she's on it.Can Eatman be canned mid season? I only saw the 2nd half, wow. Put Nadine in charge for remainder of year,
he's the problem with his coaching.He isnt the problem but he's been made out to be the scapegoat
she's not even allowed to be involved, is my understanding what her LOA doesBut she isn't sitting on the sidelines.
he's the problem with his coaching.
Rutgers was a winning program before he took over.
Might not have been a top program, but 78-36 in last 4 years.(.684)
2 trips to Tourney in those 4 years and 1 year it was canceled so could have been the last 3 years made the Dance.
The other year no dance RU was 20-12
Hobbs ??????????This isnt on him and you know it
Hobbs ??????????
Because you're usual target isn't in the picture and we can't say she wouldn't have made the team play a lot better if she was coaching today.
So, spit it out already would ya.Hobbs is part of the problem but there is someone else
lol, seems like you want to make a case, but can't.Hobbs is part of the problem but there is someone else
The problem still 100% is on CVS she had Hobbs backed into a corner; Lets look at it the optics of firing a hall of fame coach et al just would not look good and she made it a point to not resign or retire gracefully; he has flat out wanted her out for a while now; at this point I am sure he has his short list ready to go once the season is over and he will act swiftly at this timeuntil CVS is removed, this whole stain on the program cannot be fixed
It was obvious from day 1 that Eatmann never should have been head coach, thats not his fault, its Hobbs and CVS. He was put into a ridiculous situation created by CVS and compounded by Hobbs. The rest of the RU assistant staff is below average and has been for almost a decade now. Do not look for help there. The idea of virtually entire team of transfers is not the way to run a program.
There is no vision and little direction for the program currently and the recruiting strategy is a joke at this current time if there is any recruiting going on
Until this situation resolves, who cares who is the coach, we do not have the talent here, we dont have team unity or any kind of vision. Losing to Wisconsin is hardly surprising at all. This is a program in an abyss. You dont just remove the scab. Unfortunately its going to cost $5 million which will then basically make the program be run on the cheap for several years later. Get used to RU being a Wisconsin/Illinois of the Big 10 until a full cycle with a new coach or a 2nd coach goes through
a well thought out anti Stringer post that I won't try to knock and can somewhat agree withuntil CVS is removed, this whole stain on the program cannot be fixed
It was obvious from day 1 that Eatmann never should have been head coach, thats not his fault, its Hobbs and CVS. He was put into a ridiculous situation created by CVS and compounded by Hobbs. The rest of the RU assistant staff is below average and has been for almost a decade now. Do not look for help there. The idea of virtually entire team of transfers is not the way to run a program.
There is no vision and little direction for the program currently and the recruiting strategy is a joke at this current time if there is any recruiting going on
Until this situation resolves, who cares who is the coach, we do not have the talent here, we dont have team unity or any kind of vision. Losing to Wisconsin is hardly surprising at all. This is a program in an abyss. You dont just remove the scab. Unfortunately its going to cost $5 million which will then basically make the program be run on the cheap for several years later. Get used to RU being a Wisconsin/Illinois of the Big 10 until a full cycle with a new coach or a 2nd coach goes through
There were a few more on the men's basketball and football sideline that should be included.Is this guy trying to be included in the Rutgers Horrors Hall of Fame?
Current members include Fred Gruninger, Eddie Jordan, Kyle Flood, Chris Ash, Craig Littlepage, Terry Shea, and Fred Hill, Jr.
He is a lawyer and he was Dean of the Law School at the Hall.There were a few more on the men's basketball and football sideline that should be included.
Hope you aren’t talking about Doug Graber. I actually liked him. Rutgers would not spend any money on academic support so we kept losing kids.There were a few more on the men's basketball and football sideline that should be included.
No not Doug, but there were quite a number of football coordinators that were head scratchers over the years. I'd add Rice and Bannon to the Basketball Head Coach list along with a bevy of basketball assistants to the list.Hope you aren’t talking about Doug Graber. I actually liked him. Rutgers would not spend any money on academic support so we kept losing kids.
On your list, while Flood belongs - I always thought he had the makings of a decent coach until he put himself into trouble violating rules. And Fred G. was a different era, he actually was a pretty good AD for his time. Did he stay too long? Don't know enough to determine.Hope you aren’t talking about Doug Graber. I actually liked him. Rutgers would not spend any money on academic support so we kept losing kids.
You may be the first person that I have heard that said Fred Gruninger was a good AD. Nice person maybe but good AD never. And yes I know him and many people that were in the department under his tenure.On your list, while Flood belongs - I always thought he had the makings of a decent coach until he put himself into trouble violating rules. And Fred G. was a different era, he actually was a pretty good AD for his time. Did he stay too long? Don't know enough to determine.
I didn't know him, we came to Rutgers near the end of his tenure (I did meet him and hear him speak to Cager's Club). But over the course of trying to learn about college sports, which we now follow so passionately, I discovered that there was an "era" where the ex golf coaches and the equivalent became the AD's. With I suppose somewhat low expectations. From what I read, in his early years, he was largely better than his peers, accomplished facilities work, hired good coaches and eventually got Rutgers on track from A10 to Big East. That said, by 1995 when we came aboard, I admit he was an anachronism in the changing of college sports, and should have been gone for a number of years.You may be the first person that I have heard that said Fred Gruninger was a good AD. Nice person maybe but good AD never. And yes I know him and many people that were in the department under his tenure.
I might be the second person, at least during his early years.. In Fred Gruninger's first 5 years as AD, RU football was a combined 41-13-1, and RU men's basketball was a combined 113-34. Both teams recorded an undefeated regular season during that span... Sure, we weren't in a major conference, but that was a good time to be a Rutgers sports fan and I have a lot of fond memories from then, so I'd think that the AD deserves at least a little bit of the credit, at least during that time period.You may be the first person that I have heard that said Fred Gruninger was a good AD. Nice person maybe but good AD never. And yes I know him and many people that were in the department under his tenure.
I get the fondness but not sure he should get much credit for that success.. My recollection is that he had little to do with the hiring of those coaches. From what I was told Burns was hired before Gruninger was officially the AD. If he is going to get credit for his first 4 years as an AD he needs to wear the next 21. Because he set RU back by decades by turning down the Big East, questionable basketball and football hires, and sticking with underachieving coaches in most if not all of the non revenue sports for way too long. Also outside of the RAC the rest of the facilities were severely substandard compared to peers.I might be the second person, at least during his early years.. In Fred Gruninger's first 5 years as AD, RU football was a combined 41-13-1, and RU men's basketball was a combined 113-34. Both teams recorded an undefeated regular season during that span... Sure, we weren't in a major conference, but that was a good time to be a Rutgers sports fan and I have a lot of fond memories from then, so I'd think that the AD deserves at least a little bit of the credit, at least during that time period.
Not necessarily disagreeing. As I said, I was only referring to his first 5 years as AD, based on the impressive success of RU athletics at the time. Admittedly I don't know all of the details surrounding his performance as AD.I get the fondness but not sure he should get much credit for that success.. My recollection is that he had little to do with the hiring of those coaches. From what I was told Burns was hired before Gruninger was officially the AD. If he is going to get credit for his first 4 years as an AD he needs to wear the next 21. Because he set RU back by decades by turning down the Big East, questionable basketball and football hires, and sticking with underachieving coaches in most if not all of the non revenue sports for way too long. Also outside of the RAC the rest of the facilities were severely substandard compared to peers.