Do you think the Rutgers - SH series has anywhere near the same juice as Kentucky - Louisville?
Of course it doesn’t but that doesn’t mean Rutgers-SHU isn’t a rivalry. It’s a great rivalry.
Do you think the Rutgers - SH series has anywhere near the same juice as Kentucky - Louisville?
So we weren't even in the Big East when you left New Jersey. You're certainly allowed your opinion but I think you're a couple decades behind the curve on this one. Have you attended a single RU-Hall game since then?
Do you think the Rutgers - SH series has anywhere near the same juice as Kentucky - Louisville?
I left in 93 so yes we were in the Big East for football anyway. And up until that time we had been playing SHU fairly regularly. I have been back for many football games but not for a bball game against SHU. There is this thing called tv which beats a 400 mile drive for a 2 hour bball game.
I'm just stating the way SHU is perceived in Virginia and no doubt the rest of the country west and south of the Northeast. SHU is not important to RU for anything other than NJ bragging rights. What's important to RU is its standing in the Big Ten.
Maybe we're just defining "rivalry" differently. I'd be surprised if SH considers St Johns a big rivalry. Geographic proximate, yes, but rivalry, no. Do either school have the dates of their games circled on their calendar? Can the outcome of the game make or break a season? Would you trade 2 wins over Georgetown and Marquette for 1 win over St Johns?
If that's your definition of a big rivalry, that explains why you think Rutgers-SH is a big rivalry.
I’m pretty sure Kyk has the SHU game circled on his calendar. Btw, Eddie Jordan had a 5k bonus in his contract for beating SHU, so apparently the RU power brokers disagree with you
I think Pike and Willard have the same bonus. And there is a trophy presentation at the end of the game. There is certainly a desire to make this a big rivalry. And while it may be more of a rivalry than the manufactured Civil CONN-FLict rivalry, I just don't see it being a big rivalry now. Maybe it is moving in that direction, and maybe one day it will be. But today, it is just a OOC game against a local high-major school.I’m pretty sure Kyk has the SHI game circled on his calendar. Btw, Eddie Jordan had a 5k bonus in his contract for beating SHU, so apparently the RU power brokers disagree with you
I think you're not an RU or SHU fan if you don't have that game circled every year. It's unfathomable that an RU or SHU fan can deny we are by far and away each others biggest rival. I know SHU tries to pretend they have a rivalry with Nova but it's really not much of a rivalry as SHU has only been competitive a handful of times @nova and I think Nova has won something like 10 of the past 12 matchups and this is the years that SHU has been considered "good".I’m pretty sure Kyk has the SHI game circled on his calendar. Btw, Eddie Jordan had a 5k bonus in his contract for beating SHU, so apparently the RU power brokers disagree with you
this is a really dumb take and you keep repeating it. You clearly don't pay attention to the local landscape. This game means a lot for numerous reasons. In state supremacy, recruiting, narrative, long time rival. Name me a more important or hyped up out of conference game we have played since joining the big ten. Shit forget about out of conference, tell me the last time we played a game that was more highly anticipated than the annual SHU gameI think Pike and Willard have the same bonus. And there is a trophy presentation at the end of the game. There is certainly a desire to make this a big rivalry. And while it may be more of a rivalry than the manufactured Civil CONN-FLict rivalry, I just don't see it being a big rivalry now. Maybe it is moving in that direction, and maybe one day it will be. But today, it is just a OOC game against a local high-major school.
this is a really dumb take and you keep repeating it. You clearly don't pay attention to the local landscape. This game means a lot for numerous reasons. In state supremacy, recruiting, narrative, long time rival. Name me a more important or hyped up out of conference game we have played since joining the big ten. Shit forget about out of conference, tell me the last time we played a game that was more highly anticipated than the annual SHU game
Tough to sell out a game you're probably going to lose. Maybe Monmouth/RU would have more juice.Just because it it the closest thing to a real rivalry that Rutgers has in basketball, doesn't make it a rivalry.
We had 3 sold-out games last season. The Seton Hall game has only sold out once in the last decade plus, when SH was ranked 15. If it were a big rivalry, even with Rutgers in the doldrums, you would think the RAC would fill up every year with Seton Hall fans willing to make the 30 mile trip to Piscataway.
If Rutgers is probably going to lose, then SH is probably going to win. You can't get a couple thousand fans to make the 30 mile trip to Piscataway for a big rivalry game you are probably going to win (assuming it is a big rivalry game).Tough to sell out a game you're probably going to lose. Maybe Monmouth/RU would have more juice.
Not sure if your stupid, ignorant, or both...
How many sellouts did RU have in the years the SHU game didnt sell out? Just quit. Youre embarrassing youself now. Denying that seton hall is a rival is like denying that you need oxygen to liveJust because it it the closest thing to a real rivalry that Rutgers has in basketball, doesn't make it a rivalry.
We had 3 sold-out games last season. The Seton Hall game has only sold out once in the last decade plus, when SH was ranked 15. If it were a big rivalry, even with Rutgers in the doldrums, you would think the RAC would fill up every year with Seton Hall fans willing to make the 30 mile trip to Piscataway.
I think Pike and Willard have the same bonus. And there is a trophy presentation at the end of the game. There is certainly a desire to make this a big rivalry. And while it may be more of a rivalry than the manufactured Civil CONN-FLict rivalry, I just don't see it being a big rivalry now. Maybe it is moving in that direction, and maybe one day it will be. But today, it is just a OOC game against a local high-major school.
Willard does not have a bonus for beating RU. I would be shocked if Pike has that incentive and would be even more surprised if Hobbs approved such a provision.
How many sellouts did RU have in the years the SHU game didnt sell out?
Haha keep diggin yourself a hole buddyRutgers played SH at the RAC OOC 2 years ago, and 4 and 6 years ago, and in the Big East 7 years ago.
2 years ago, SH was ranked and the game sold out. It was one of 2 games (along with Purdue) that sold out. Illinois was just shy of a sell out.
4 years ago, SH at the RAC drew 1000 fewer fans than Monmouth at the RAC. Is Monmouth a big rivalry now?
6 years ago, SH at the RAC drew fewer fans than Louisville, UConn, Houston, Memphis, USF, or Cincinnati.
7 years ago, SH and Rutgers played home-home in the Big East. The SH game at the RAC drew fewer fans than games like Georgetown, Louisville, and Howard. That's right, Howard drew more fans than our big rival.
If this is a big rivalry, with a lot of juice, that fans care about, then you expect the Seton Hall fans would make the easy 30 mile trip to see their big rivalry game.
Maybe this series is on its way to becoming a big rivalry. Maybe there is a desire for it to be a big rivalry. But based on the recent 7 year history, it is not a big rivalry.
So basically you've got nothing.Haha keep diggin yourself a hole buddy
Youre an absolute and total ****ing clown to argue here allllll day that SHU isnt an enormous rival of ours. In fact your argument is that theyre not even a rival. Go paint your faceSo basically you've got nothing.
The attendance numbers that show this is not a big rivalry. Friggin Monmouth outdrew Seton Hall. If this is a big rivalry, the biggest game of the season, Seton Hall fans make the short trip to watch the game at least in the same numbers as Monmouth fans.
Great rivalry but . . . Would anyone trade a conference win for a win over shu?
Willard does NOT have that bonus in his contract. We are a small private university and unfortunately do not have tax payers $$$$$ to piss away like big state university like ru has.I think Pike and Willard have the same bonus. And there is a trophy presentation at the end of the game. There is certainly a desire to make this a big rivalry. And while it may be more of a rivalry than the manufactured Civil CONN-FLict rivalry, I just don't see it being a big rivalry now. Maybe it is moving in that direction, and maybe one day it will be. But today, it is just a OOC game against a local high-major school.
I left in 93 so yes we were in the Big East for football anyway. And up until that time we had been playing SHU fairly regularly. I have been back for many football games but not for a bball game against SHU. There is this thing called tv which beats a 400 mile drive for a 2 hour bball game.
I'm just stating the way SHU is perceived in Virginia and no doubt the rest of the country west and south of the Northeast. SHU is not important to RU for anything other than NJ bragging rights. What's important to RU is its standing in the Big Ten.
Willard does NOT have that bonus in his contract. We are a small private university and unfortunately do not have tax payers $$$$$ to piss away like big state university like ru has.
So basically you've got nothing.
The attendance numbers that show this is not a big rivalry. Friggin Monmouth outdrew Seton Hall. If this is a big rivalry, the biggest game of the season, Seton Hall fans make the short trip to watch the game at least in the same numbers as Monmouth fans.
I was there. It was exciting. It was a come from behind win over the number 15 team in the country.Upstream. Just about every RU hoops fan would say SHU is a rival of ours. If you were at the game two years ago, you would have felt the excitement.
I was there. It was exciting. It was a come from behind win over the number 15 team in the country.
What about the previous time Seton Hall came to the RAC. The building was 1/3 empty. Rutgers Monmouth drew 1000 more fans.
I'm not saying I don't enjoy beating SH. I'm not saying that sometimes the games are exciting. I'm not even saying it doesn't have the potential to be a big rivalry.
But it is not a big rivalry now. If it had the juice, meaning, and importance of a big rivalry, people would show up. All the time, not just when one team is ranked.
Let's just say it is a rivalry, but a small rivalry, not a big rivalry. It is a small rivalry that is important to those who attend the games. But it is not important enough to get 1500 students to cross the river or get a couple thousand Seton Hall fans to make the 30 mile trip.
will be very few SHU fans at this years game IMO. The tickets are pretty much almost all gobbled up by RU season ticket holdersThe last two RU @ SHU games sold out, 10k+ and many RU fans attended. Over a few thousand each game. RU hoops fans don't travel like that vs any other team.
Lots of SHU fans were in the RAC in 2017, mostly in the 300s but the rivalry is becoming fiercer
I cannot imagine anyone saying they are not our biggest rivalry.
Obviously I have a different take on what makes a rivalry than some others on this board.
Great rivalry but . . . Would anyone trade a conference win for a win over shu?
you're really just digging deeper. This is sad to watch. Do you seriously think there's another game outside of SHU that casual RU fans care about? Do you really think the game didn't have a big time feel the past 3 years under pike? Is Cincy and Xaiver now not a rivalry because it's a "little rivalry" that only fans of the teams care about. Haha you're brutal dude.That is not what I am saying. They may be our biggest rival, and the closest thing we have to a "Big Rivalry". But the Rutgers - Seton Hall series is not a Big Rivalry, at best it is a Minor Rivalry.
This series is pretty much only important to the fans who show up to the games .... which for the most part, is only a segment of the fanbases.
In order for it to be a big rivalry, it has to be important enough for all fans to care. Not just the fans who attend the games, or just the diehard fans, but all the fans. Fans who only attend one game per season have to circle this game on their calendars and want to attend this game as their only game. It has to matter enough to them.
And the game has to be a big game all the time, not just when both teams are decent, or when one team is ranked. The excuse that Rutgers was bad is a flimsy excuse, because if this were a big rivalry thousands of SH fans would make the trip to the RAC to watch their team pummel their rival. But two games ago at the RAC, this series was so unimportant that Rutgers-Monmouth drew 1000 more fans. That doesn't happen if this is a Big Rivalry.
The last two RU @ SHU games sold out, 10k+ and many RU fans attended. Over a few thousand each game. RU hoops fans don't travel like that vs any other team.
Lots of SHU fans were in the RAC in 2017, mostly in the 300s but the rivalry is becoming fiercer