Starters only version of rankings now available

[andegre]

I know there are some out there that have issues with the way WrestleStat ranks EVERYONE. I took a bit of time today to make a "starters-only" version of each of the rankings pages (by weight).

Now, when you're on a weight-specific rankings page, there's a link just above the data that says "Starters". Click that to view just the starters for that weight class. You can take it a step further and filter the starters-only version to go by conference. So for Big 10, you can view the 14 starters at any weight.

http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/125
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/133
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/141
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/149
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/157
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/165
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/174
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/184
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/197
http://www.wrestlestat.com/rankings/starters/weight/285

 

[Passe24]

Question. Remind me what this goes by again? Ward is number 2 at 141. Why? Just curious.

 

[andegre]

Question. Remind me what this goes by again? Ward is number 2 at 141. Why? Just curious.

Takes the end of year "points" from their rankings last year and used that as the preseason ranking for this year.

 

[obrats]

I think he was wondering how he was ranked #2 at the end of last season with 6 losses. Frank if that was the question, I think his win of Dean Heil gave him a lot of points.

 

[Passe24]

It was thanks Buddy. I have to keep reminding my self to take the human element out of this. Because in no way 1 win over Heil and a handful of losses to the other top 10 guys would put him in that spot. I do love the changes you guys made this year. Very cool.