You are a piece of work.
Bill has been on the pulse of this the entire time and only said he didnt know how the B1G committee would decide.
He has far more accountability and credibility here than you do. So if he says PSU acted in a manner that was untowards, we are going to believe him. He doesnt need to prove anything. We trust him as he has earned that trust. You havent.
So either provide some clarity or run along. But please stop trying to attack Bill's character.
I'm not attacking his character but what he writes. Trying actually reading what he said just above.
PSU had no idea what the RU/Surianos claims were to the committee as the committee does not share that with them. They only ask if they support or reject the waiver.
One, he's had several different versions on how the waiver process works, depending on what nonsense the Rutgers staff tells him that week. At times it's been portrayed as an adversarial proceeding, at other times Penn State would be provided the opportunity to hear Suriano's case and either oppose or endorse it. Now, the B1G apparently sits with a big mystery box and asks Penn State to approve or disapprove what is in the box without seeing it - they don't even get a chance to know what the grounds for waiver are. They have to blindly oppose or support the request. It's ludicrous. Do you really believe he's correct about this? It's like "Let's Make a Deal" for dummies. Do you want what's in box 1 or box 2?
Two, where does he say "PSU acted in a manner that was untowards"? If what he said other times about the process had been true, Penn State's failure to support the waiver would have killed the waiver request. Guess that wasn't true, either.
Just wondering, do you have documentation of the process to back up your claims that this version is "ludicrous", as you put it?
Because without documentation, we just can't believe what you are saying is factual, and if we can't prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's factual, then you have no right to post it on a free message board, and you should have been more responsible than that.
LOL