Originally posted by Dr. Potato:
Pernetti got rid of Gary Waters the best coach we had in 20 plus years and put in Fred Hill and then that other whacko Rice.
Pernetti flat out sucked ass as AD. Horrible.
Would take Gary Waters back in a second.
Waters was a good HC in the mid majors but had a losing RECORD IN be 4 of the 5 years he was the RU MBB HC
His first year went 8-8 in conference play.
Also had a losing record in two (2nd year and 4th) of the five years he was RU's HC.
Waters was not a good fit as a HC at RU , but was and is a good HC at the mid major level.
As far as Pernetti firing Waters, maybe if you did a google search , you would Waters resign and accept a buyout so Mulcahy could hire Fred Hill Jr.
So Pernetti wasn't involved in any way with Gary leaving RU.
As for hiring Fred Hill Jr., again your facts are wrong: Mulcahy hired Freddie when he was AD , Tim got rid of him when he was RU's AD.
The only thing yo got right was Pernetti was the one who hired Mike Rice.
As for Waters being the best RU MBB HC in 20 years, with the low bar set after Tom Young left, you might be right but
his competition for that best HC spot was mighty poor.
Bob Wenzel might take top spot over Waters because he brought RU to the Big Dance twice in his 9 years as the RU MBB HC. His 128-135 in those 9 years might keep him from top spot
Gary's 79-75 record with 3 NIT bids isn't a great resume but ,compared to the other RU HCs after Tom Young, might be good enough to make you right about Waters being the pick of the litter.
You should try and have your facts straight before making any claims.
Facts:
Waters was hired by Mulcahy and Gary resigned when Mulcahy was the AD( though more than likely Mulcahy forced that resignation ).
Hill was hired by Mulcahy, not Pernetti!
Rutgers should strive have a HC that could do better than being barely over 500 as its HC and not have a winning conference record in the 5 years he was RU's HC.
Gary was a good man and competent HC, but not good enough to make RU into the type of program RU MBB fans want.
So taking him back in a second should be considered: loser mentality.