well im just saying its not going to changeBAC....there were 4 games last year where on an adjusted basis we gave up more than a point per possession
the last 4 games we hve been over 1.00 and 18/27 overALL
well im just saying its not going to changeBAC....there were 4 games last year where on an adjusted basis we gave up more than a point per possession
the last 4 games we hve been over 1.00 and 18/27 overALL
and Im excited, i missed the Iowa game because of the flu and looked dreaful against the Frans but I have miss piss and vinger bac, the winter cold is breaking, and I want to see some offensive showmanship at the RAC Sunday nightLOOKING AT THEM on bart.....looks that way...going to be like watching a NBA game
I have ZERO evidence that it will change...we have been trending the wrong way.well im just saying its not going to change
25 % probability we are disinterested on D and shoot worse than normal and lose badlyand Im excited, i missed the Iowa game because of the flu and looked dreaful against the Frans but I have miss piss and vinger bac, the winter cold is breaking, and I want to see some offensive showmanship at the RAC Sunday night
no there have been games where we tried to grind things out...NW, Illinois, UCLA
its not worth the effort right now with zero at large shot and no point in trying to build for the future, this is about right here right now
expect 2 ugly losses vs Michgan and Purdue and two probable exciting wins for USC and Minnesota
It's never gonna happen but we need to win out plus 2 or 3 wins in tourey...19 or 20-15 MIGHT get us in...
The defense showed signs of improvement at one point but has since regressed back to embarrassingTalk to me when there ANY signs the defense is inproving.
It is actually getting worse
Our recipe for success is shooting 50% from 3 and over 50% on all FGs.
noIt's never gonna happen but we need to win out plus 2 or 3 wins in tourey...19 or 20-15 MIGHT get us in...
no"If we can just go 7-1" is back on the table!
3-1 to finish out the season
Get 9th seed in BTT
4-0 in BTT
Tourney bid!!
Folks don’t get it. 15 losses on selection day would be historic. Like 2-3 other scenerios of it ever - we flat out would not have the resume for consideration.
I think everyone gets it. No one thinks we are making the tournament anymore
Yes, Virginia last year and W. Virginia the year before.Folks don’t get it. 15 losses on selection day would be historic. Like 2-3 other scenerios of it ever - we flat out would not have the resume for consideration.
No it is not. All of the wing problems start because of the allowance repeatedly , like every possession , of our guards specifically JMike , Jordan and Tyson , of not playing to keep their man in front of them . Jeremiah at least tries and is partially effective as does Dylan but it needs correction. The biggest frustration is Pike actually thinks JMike is a good defensive player and continues to play him too much as Jeremiah and Tyson must get the guard minutes after Dylan , as he has been horrendous defensively in almost every game.And just think, the guard defense you lambaste is the best part of our defense. The defense from the wing's and big's is even worse.
WVU got in two years ago with 14 losses on selection day. Not 15. Not sure what your talking about on Virginia.Yes, Virginia last year and W. Virginia the year before.
Manny ‘s loss turns out to hurt us more than his actually stat production as it has now caused Lathan to get in foul trouble every game. Then Pike goes to Martini which is an absolute disaster in the post and then to Grant who has size , can rebound and block shots. But we don’t want Grant playing the 5.Worst defensive team in the Pike era for sure. Ogbole season-ending injury was a huge hit on the defensive end, and he was improving too. We need Harper and Ace to score 45-50 combined to have a chance in any game, that's asking too much to grind through a B1G season and tourney. But I'll keep hoping.
A couple folks above posted possibilities of us sneaking in if we win 6 straight. It’s not happening, but we still wouldn’t get in even if it did.
0.0 chance. No offense but a 15 loss team with losses to ksu and princeton won't even be in the discussion.It's never gonna happen but we need to win out plus 2 or 3 wins in tourey...19 or 20-15 MIGHT get us in...
Yup 14 losses playing in one of the best conferences in the history of bball. We beat pitt, auburn, kansas st, tcu and Iowa state. We also had no bad losses and something like 8 or 9 of our losses were to ranked team.WVU got in two years ago with 14 losses on selection day. Not 15. Not sure what your talking about on Virginia.
Ogbole's injury was the turning point on D imho. We have donut D--big hole in the middle, can't stop guards driving or a decent or better big man when he gets the ball in/near the paint. As others have noted, Lathan, who stinks defensively anyway, is always in foul trouble leading to Martini who adds next to nothing on D or rebounding, and can't score like Sommerville. Grant is OK but still can be overmatched by a bigger C/F. Dortch is next man-up but even at 6'9 he needs to bulk-up to play with B1G bigs, and he's obviously a project offensively.The defense showed signs of improvement at one point but has since regressed back to embarrassing
I've never seen so many easy buckets game after game after game
From the wishcasting dept.: if we won out, then lost in the B1G tourney title game, I am certain we'd get in. We'd have won nine in a row (or perhaps eight straight if we finish in the top 9 at 10-10). We'd be the talk of the country and there's no way the committee would keep Ace and Dylan out of the big dance. The demand to see them in the NCAA tournament would be sky high.What if we win out and that includes beating Michigan and Purdue on the road? lol. I honestly think we'd be back in the at large conversation,
From the wishcasting dept.: if we won out, then lost in the B1G tourney title game, I am certain we'd get in. We'd have won nine in a row (or perhaps eight straight if we finish in the top 9 at 10-10). We'd be the talk of the country and there's no way the committee would keep Ace and Dylan out of the big dance. The demand to see them in the NCAA tournament would be sky high.
From the wishcasting dept.: if we won out, then lost in the B1G tourney title game, I am certain we'd get in. We'd have won nine in a row (or perhaps eight straight if we finish in the top 9 at 10-10). We'd be the talk of the country and there's no way the committee would keep Ace and Dylan out of the big dance. The demand to see them in the NCAA tournament would be sky high.
Those schools didn't have two of the top 3 picks in the upcoming NBA draft.No
See other schools who lost in finals..Ohio State couple of years back
You funny tooWhat if we win out and that includes beating Michigan and Purdue on the road? lol. I honestly think we'd be back in the at large conversation,
Won't matter...17-14 entering tourney and the committee already has their at large selections by ThursdayThose schools didn't have two of the top 3 picks in the upcoming NBA draft.
newsflash.....DOGE cut your departmentFrom the wishcasting dept.: if we won out, then lost in the B1G tourney title game, I am certain we'd get in. We'd have won nine in a row (or perhaps eight straight if we finish in the top 9 at 10-10). We'd be the talk of the country and there's no way the committee would keep Ace and Dylan out of the big dance. The demand to see them in the NCAA tournament would be sky high.
i think his scenario might have us in. you may be the expert here but I am taking your badge for this one.
Texas A& M was the team who won all those games and lost in the final. Another committee error as A& M should have been selected as they just ran out of gas on the 5 th game. Just like NC State last year , who would not be selected except they won 5 in 5 days. But they obviously were good enough to make the Sweet 16. Committee ****s up all the time.Won't matter...17-14 entering tourney and the committee already has their at large selections by Thursday
Edit..that wasn't osu...I think Texas A&M and also VA tech who did win acc tourney but their seed of 13 indicated they would have not been an at large
i think his scenario might have us in. you may be the expert here but I am taking your badge for this one.
...but in the improbable scenario I stated, RU's incredible resume would have started last night.No but beyond that its .1% type stuff
You can't make a resume in 5 days
.1% may be optimistic. how many wins would we have against teams in the BTTNo but beyond that its .1% type stuff
You can't make a resume in 5 days
But we would have like 7 quad 1 wins!!0.0 chance. No offense but a 15 loss team with losses to ksu and princeton won't even be in the discussion.
4....1% may be optimistic. how many wins would we have against teams in the BTT
15 losses including Kennesaw and PrincetonBut we would have like 7 quad 1 wins!!
Normally the losses are the disqualifier. But one thing you seem to ignore is the number of Quad 1 games we have played. 15 of our 27. No other team on the bubble and beyond is even close. We are second to Auburn. Now 4-11 ( Penn State moved back to Quad 1 is not good but under Mike ‘s scenario if Michigan and Purdue fall that is 6-11. If the tourney results in another that would be 7 Quad 1 wins. It is worth a consideration even though it might be considered not enough with the entire body of work.15 losses including Kennesaw and Princeton