ADVERTISEMENT

Tim Cluess

Not denigrating Pike at all (I think he has done a great job so far), just pointing out Cluess is also a pretty good coach.
You SHU and ND guys in this thread are dense. No one said Cluess is a bad coach, just that he may not have been the right guy for this rebuild. Pike took over a 4-win SB team and built the program. Hopefully he can do the same after taking over a 7 win team here.
 
Stupid comments by a good coach for what he has been able to do at Iona.
 
Hawk stated that Cluess is nowhere near as good a coach as Pike. I disagreed. No need for personal attacks Pete.
 
Skillet is right, look at the last 5 years is a better comparison.
 
The Rutgers job was and I'm using that tense, not the most attractive coaching job. 25 years of mostly going downhill, the RAC falling apart and coaches who just couldn't get the ball rolling. The Rice debacle hit Rutgers harder than it would impact a lot of other schools. Eddie was the icing on the cake of bad decisions.

Now, we did a 180. Our president hired an athletic director who jumped in from day one with the message of changing the faces of our major programs and getting donors to believe.

Nothing against Tim Cluess and he did say the program is going in the right direction; but if he comparing Rutgers to opting to stay at Iona; that's a load of horse shit. He's won a lot of games at Iona but you are not getting much attention in the ranks of college basketball coaches at a school like that. Maybe Danny Hurley should have stayed at Wagner, right? I have nothing against longevity at smaller schools but you would think someone would have come after Cluess at this point? Maybe St. John's would have been a good spot?
 
Pikiell and Cluess are both good coaches. Pikiell is the better fit here. I don't see Cluess style of play translating to wins on a regular basis in the B1G. I'm not knocking Cluess by saying that.

I also don't have a problem with what Cluess said about RU. Historically, the university has not supported men's basketball adequately. You can compare the facilities and money spent on the program between RU and its peers. RU is definitely on the lower end to put it mildly. However, I see reason for optimism with Hobbs, Pikiell, and the university getting more money from the B1G in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DECKRU and jrh51
I think both are good coaches and sometimes the grass isn't greener over the hill. Some guys are happy where they are------nothing wrong with that.

Also believe that with coaching and most things in life there is no one right way of doing it.

How did the last RU NCAA team get it done ?

They won with transfers like Duncan and Hughes .
 
Have residual fondness for Iona because Jim Valvano coached there.
Valvano coached Iona in one of my favorite college games seen in-person. At MSG, Valvano's Iona upset Louisville.
 
Beat them by 30 as I recall-----was there myself.

Ville went on to win the National Championship if memory serves.
 
I dont care if the guy can coach or not...the quote was classless and sounded very insecure.

and as others have said, thrilled we have Pike and not Clueless.
 
“I wasn’t going to leave Long Island for that."

had to ponder that statement - I mean - Iona is in New Rochelle - Westchester County ....

- ah but Cluess actually does live in Floral Park, N.Y. - on Long Island

- so back in 2010 when he made the move from LIU to Iona - he did not have to 'leave Long Island" - did not leave his lifelong home - just altered his commute

Cluess has Long Island woven through his heart - he is kind of a true 'lifer' - and while he might make the move for the 'can't refuse - ready to win - opportunity' it would seem that no matter what - it would exact a huge price on a personal level - and he knows it - and it would place him a real distance from his roots & extended family - and life experiences have played a strong role in framing his perspective
http://www.espn.com/new-york/story/_/id/7350224/iona-gaels-tim-cluess-keeps-brothers-memories-alive
almost get the sense that, now at age 58, the only step-up job that would be in sync with his deepest personal sentiments would be St Johns


- never knew this backstory - but now in thinking about it - it does not seem so much like he was bashing RU as much as he was sort of revealing how deeply tied he was to Long Island ... and how the threshold for him to depart may be very very high


Oh and to be clear - I think Pikiell was & is far and away the ideal choice - right mind set, insightful - and on & on just an excellent selection - given time & resources he will build the program to the point where the first thing people think when they think Rutgers Basketball is "Oh, they always play really really high quality games - sleep on them & you go home a loser"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RutgHoops
If Cluess was such a good coach how come his name is not mentioned for Job Openings ? He is 58 and still at Iona, so he is making a faction of what Steve Pikiell or Kevin Willard are making.
 
Cluess is a good coach period. He may not be the right guy or good guy here, but that doesn't mean he's not a winner.
We are happy with pike.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shields
Why are we even discussing this guy? We defeated their team at MSG when they were supposed to be loaded and we were poor. I am so happy we have Pikiell tham Mr. Transfer. Iona runs up & down the court and score a lot but play very little defense. They also are in a much easier league so they fatten up their record.
 
He had interest when the Rice debacle went down, but we didn't have the mechanics to lure him away from Iona back then....sometimes coaches miss opportunities, Cluess name was tied to Seton Hall years ago as well, but is still somehow stuck at Iona....Pike will have this gig for a very long time....everything is on the way up, which will eventually turn into the staffs salaries going way up as well.

Cluess is nowhere near Pike's class as a coach/teacher and definitely doesn't believe in defense and rebounding, so he is absolutely not a fit in this conference, where you must rebound and recruit size to win. Running and gunning aimlessly like Iona plays works at the MAAC level, but cannot translate at this next level of recruiting.
Running and gunning translated fairly well for UCLA most of last season.
 
Why do coaches feel the need to talk about other programs, and take digs at them? Even if asked there is an easy classy way to answer. Obviously Cluess is not classy.
I guess you could say he is cluessless
 
Or a Br'er Rabbit move to get Rutgers to schedule a home-and-home arrangement with the Gaels, with maybe the Gaels' end of the bargain at MSG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
I don't think there is much arguing the fact that Rutgers is the most challenging rebuild in the country for any coach. You not only have to be a good coach and recruiter but you have to be able to handle the fact that you are going to lose in your first three years. And you have to have the energy to put in the endless hours. And you have to have the ability to convince both recruits and donors that this thing can get turned around. Pike seems to fit all those criteria. A lot of really really good coaches (Cluess included) wouldn't be able to.
 
I didn't think the comment was that bad or too much of a slap in the face....we had Hurley pretty much on the hook, not once but twice and he indirectly said the same thing Cluess did.....but that's really his loss at the end of the day, RU is a future gold mine of revenue and upside, not everyone sees it, but Pike and this staff are turning heads on the recruiting trail and the dividends will payoff down the road.

Hurley said as much the first time around, and it would be hard to argue that wasn't true, but he was very complimentary towards what Rutgers had put in place and was planning to the second time. He just had some promises to keep in Rhode Island and a good situation there at the time.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT