ADVERTISEMENT

Wolf's Development

Wolf has the game of a 5, not a 4. And as the primary backup he can’t play with Cliff and risk them both picking up fouls. Ogbole is very raw and has only played against a very low level of competition. I am not expecting him to contribute anything next year.
Again, the optimistic view would be that his game develops to the point were he can play some 4.

And sure in some games fouls are a concern, in some games they are not.
 
Again, the optimistic view would be that his game develops to the point were he can play some 4.

And sure in some games fouls are a concern, in some games they are not.
We have enough who can play the 4. Wolf is a 5 who brings different skill sets than Cliff but it doesn’t change his position. He will likely be the starter after Cliff leaves.
 
Middle of the road team. So maybe that plays to the point.

Were they taller in the 1-3 positions like we were though?
Their starters 1-4 (not listed in any particular order) were:

Pickett (6’4”)
Wynter (6’2”)
Funk (6’5”)
Lundy (6’6”)
 
We have enough who can play the 4. Wolf is a 5 who brings different skill sets than Cliff but it doesn’t change his position. He will likely be the starter after Cliff leaves.
Cliff averaged 30mpg last year, and late in the year played 32+ minutes in a large majority of the games.

Maybe foul concerns will limit Cliff's mpg so he won't be 32+ over a full season, but if Wolf is strictly the backup 5, then Cliff playing big minutes will limit Wolf's minutes.

I don't even think it is an overly optimistic viewpoint to think Wolf will develop enough which forces Pike's hand in terms of playing both Wolf and Cliff at the same time. Could we not see Wolf getting 12-15 mpg next year? I def think that is possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13
Their starters 1-4 (not listed in any particular order) were:

Pickett (6’4”)
Wynter (6’2”)
Funk (6’5”)
Lundy (6’6”)
So yeah, like us, good size through the 1-3 spots making up for the lack of size from the 4 spot.

And indicative of how the PF position is utilized much differently then it used to be. "Power Fwd" is probably not a great description of the position anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MiloTalon13
Cliff averaged 30mpg last year, and late in the year played 32+ minutes in a large majority of the games.

Maybe foul concerns will limit Cliff's mpg so he won't be 32+ over a full season, but if Wolf is strictly the backup 5, then Cliff playing big minutes will limit Wolf's minutes.

I don't even think it is an overly optimistic viewpoint to think Wolf will develop enough which forces Pike's hand in terms of playing both Wolf and Cliff at the same time. Could we not see Wolf getting 12-15 mpg next year? I def think that is possible.
I think Scangg called this out earlier, but until Mag is back in the rotation I think Hyatt is the only guy on the roster currently who really plays the 4, so someone else will have to fill minutes off the bench at that spot out of necessity. Out of the available guys, Woolf could end up being the best fit to fill those minutes.
 
Cliff averaged 30mpg last year, and late in the year played 32+ minutes in a large majority of the games.

Maybe foul concerns will limit Cliff's mpg so he won't be 32+ over a full season, but if Wolf is strictly the backup 5, then Cliff playing big minutes will limit Wolf's minutes.

I don't even think it is an overly optimistic viewpoint to think Wolf will develop enough which forces Pike's hand in terms of playing both Wolf and Cliff at the same time. Could we not see Wolf getting 12-15 mpg next year? I def think that is possible.

Cliff playing 25-28 minutes would benefit him more at the end of the season by keeping him fresher if Woolf makes the progression we expect and stay out of foul trouble.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MiloTalon13
I think Scangg called this out earlier, but until Mag is back in the rotation I think Hyatt is the only guy on the roster currently who really plays the 4, so someone else will have to fill minutes off the bench at that spot out of necessity. Out of the available guys, Woolf could end up being the best fit to fill those minutes.
Chol could get minutes at 4 too (hopefully)
 
Cliff playing less minutes next year then he did this year seems very unlikely. He'll probably play more.
I hope he plays about the same ~30/game because Wolf plays so well and offer such a different look
More a hope than a think if you know what I mean
Cliff is such a difference maker defensively it’s hard to imagine him playing fewer minutes than last season
 
How do we have the only fans who shrink the size of our players but believe the size of opposing players to be factual?
No Way Wtf GIF by Harlem
So true!! It’s nutty.
 
Chol is the obvious other option at the 4. If he is ready, there should be some minutes for him. If he's not, Wolf playing a few minutes at the 4 becomes much more likely
Yes, one of the many uncertainties for this upcoming season.
Can Chol contribute at the 4 and maybe a little at the 3? I'd love to see a small ball lineup with him at the 5 (if he's ready for that), but I think that may be too radical for Coach Pikiell.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
Yes, one of the many uncertainties for this upcoming season.
Can Chol contribute at the 4 and maybe a little at the 3? I'd love to see a small ball lineup with him at the 5 (if he's ready for that), but I think that may be too radical for Coach Pikiell.
What makes it that you'd love to see the small ball lineup w Chol at the 5? I don't even know if I want Chol on the floor yet. Need to see him play a couple minutes before deciding if and where he should play. I get you if your dealing with "ideally" here. Just curious.
 
What makes it that you'd love to see the small ball lineup w Chol at the 5? I don't even know if I want Chol on the floor yet. Need to see him play a couple minutes before deciding if and where he should play. I get you if your dealing with "ideally" here. Just curious.
Yes - ideally
Based on his HS highlights plus a year of practice it’s realistic that he may that kind of contributor

It’s also realistic he may not be - like much of this years roster - high variability
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
Yes - ideally
Based on his HS highlights plus a year of practice it’s realistic that he may that kind of contributor

It’s also realistic he may not be - like much of this years roster - high variability
Really if he's at all a player, he should be contributing, at least a little, in his second year in the program. Especially when we don't have a known commodity who will play a large majority of minutes at that position.

I admit I don't know his HS resume at all though, did he come in as some sort of long term project? A guy who picked up the game late?
 
Their starters 1-4 (not listed in any particular order) were:

Pickett (6’4”)
Wynter (6’2”)
Funk (6’5”)
Lundy (6’6”)
And when they hit their 3's, they won; and when they didn't, they lost.
 
And when they hit their 3's, they won; and when they didn't, they lost.
I felt PSU was one-dimensional. At least Rutgers will have options of having guards who can drive to create their shot when the outside shot isn't falling. That gives Rutgers a better chance to stay in games and possibly win without an outside shot.
 
And when they hit their 3's, they won; and when they didn't, they lost.
They got lucky with roll of the dice stuff. Shot really well against several elite teams to pick up big wins. Had their poor shooting games mostly against bubble teams on the road so didn’t look like bad losses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GSGS
He has a Trevion Williams body who played with and without Edey in the game.
One if my favorite plays of last year was when he dribbled the length of the floor for a basket and no defender was willing to get in his way. If he has made improvement in the off season, he will be a contributor
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet83
I'm pro Chol -I'm hopeful - but realistically he would be behind Palmquist at the 5 and at the 4 until proven otherwise. In fact, I would have Wolf only a hair in front of Palmquist with a lot of situations favoring Palmquist. Injuries aside, we would need only one of Wolf, Chol, Palmquist to step up and be a solid off the bench offensive contributor.
 
Last edited:
I'm pro Chol -I'm hopeful - but realistically he would be behind Palmquist at the 5 and at the 4 until proven otherwise. In fact, I would have Wolf only a hair in front of Palmquist with a lot of situations favoring Palmquist. Injuries aside, we would need only one of Wolf, Chol, Palmquist to step up and be a solid off the bench offensive contributor.
How much has Wolf improved so far this off season?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT