ADVERTISEMENT

Zach Martini - most impactful defensive player? Most important metric says so

No, my argument is that individual defensive metrics are tenuous at best. No individual player plays defense in a vacuum. It's not like field goal percentage, assists, or other stats where you are actively doing an individual activity that is either successful or not successful.

Defense is a team concept. You can do everything right defensively, but if your teammate isn't where he needs to be, it won't matter. Or you could do everything wrong, but the players around you are plus help defenders.

Defensive efficiency is a team stat... more specifically a lineup stat, but that sort of data is not tracked. Same goes for box plus minus, which is a combination of offense and defense.
Yes but adj def eff is not looking at any stats. When you see that much of a delta of Martini to others it cant be ignored

Same differential you would see with Caleb in past years and Myles
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

No. 12 Rutgers wrestling (11-4, 3-2) hits the road to face No. 8 Minnesota (7-1, 3-1) on Sunday 1 pm BigTen Network

Well, it was an ass whipping but not unexpected, don't think we'll ever close the gap on Minnesota.
I don't agree with this take. Last season we lost to Minnesota 20-12, 6-4 in bouts. Cetta lost 3-0, Gayer lost 2-0, Soldano lost 4-2, Pox lost 4-1 (SV), and Shawver lost 5-2 (SV). That was a close close loss.

No. 12 Rutgers wrestling (11-4, 3-2) hits the road to face No. 8 Minnesota (7-1, 3-1) on Sunday 1 pm BigTen Network

Well, it went pretty much as I thought. Guys competed.

One continuing issue, and it was mentioned above, is that our guys always look smaller and less muscular than guys on the teams that keep beating us (Va. Tech, NC State, OSU, PSU, Minnesota). The coaching and strength and conditioning staffs must see this too if we can all see it. What are we doing about that? Can somebody closer to the program give us some insight? It is a pretty stark contrast in body shapes when watching these duals.
  • Like
Reactions: gogs7

RAPID REACTION - Michigan

Another point is the lack of half time adjustment to them double teaming Ace. Pike needed to come up with a strategy to offset what they were doing with Ace. That's his job. Seemed like the second half was a repeat of the first half. Someone was always free when they double teamed ACE and we didn't take advantage. Hoping Ace would break out in the second half is not a strategy.
Dusty May basically said in the post game presser that he was allowing anyone but ACE beating him after he watched the Northwestern tape. Pike not getting ACE off of the 3 point line and into the paint or at the foul line , or pin downs to a 12-15 foot paint jumper , or pick and roll with JMike or Acuff were all coaching failures. Sometimes subtle small coaching adjustments are the difference between wins and losses. May would have let RU shoot 50 threes yesterday. We didn’t have to shoot them and not try to drive to get fouled or hit a mid range shot.
  • Like
Reactions: Unionst

OT: Plane and helicopter collide in DC

At some point it's going to be the 2nd day.

Look, this is important. There's no "soft peddling" flight training. There's no "let's not do this because there's risk". It's immersion training and hard core, at that.

FAA training requirements mandate that no student pilot may operate an aircraft solo before 10 hours of instruction. I did it at exactly 10, the average is probably around 12. That's not a lot of instruction. But you're either going to "get it" or you're not. It's serious business and the training process is very much designed to identify and weed out those who can't be easily trained.

First solo is an interesting ritual. Audiences are encouraged. When you land the mob cuts whatever shirt you're wearing from your body and it gets hung up on a wall. Because when you land, you've done something. Something that the overwhelming majority of people will never do and that most could never really conceive of.

I remember mine. I did a few touch & go approaches with my instructor, then landed and parked. He got out of the plane and walked away, I powered it up and taxied back to the runway and took off.

Taking off, by the way, is pretty easy. It's so easy that, on your very first introductory flight most instructors will let you do it by yourself, without their hands guiding the yoke or hovering over the throttle.

Landing is very much a different thing. Landing is hard. All. The. Time. And I vividly remember, as I turned onto a short final approach alone for the very first time, thinking to myself, "well, you have to do this or you'll die." Most people will never encounter that situation, a circumstance where, if you f*ck up just a little, you wind up actually dead.

The immersion, the baptism by fire, continue all the way through your training. Your first instrument landing. First night flight, and night landing. Your first engine-out takeoff. The first time you manage an approach in a large, fast aircraft (mine was a King Air 250, the biggest plane I've ever flown) where the approach speed is nearly 200 mph and you have to kiss the runway at a buck forty.

Right or wrong, the particular Army unit was accustomed to training in the DCA area. They did it on the daily. They did it playing chicken with commercial jets full of people who fully expected to be getting on with their lives once the plane landed. Again, you can question the sanity of it, overall - and I certainly do - but that's what they did.

So it was always, at some point, going to be the second day.

By the way, for those who aren't aware... If there are two people in the cockpit then the person not at the controls has the primary responsibility for handing the radios, engaging with non-flight controls (gear, flaps, throttles, etc.) and watching for traffic. So, for those who are really invested in the distinction, if a girl was flying the helicopter than a guy was responsible for the other stuff.
Thank you for taking the time to explain this is a clear way. Your expertise is appreciated.
  • Like
Reactions: Scarlet1984

Zach Martini - most impactful defensive player? Most important metric says so

So your arguement is his metrics are way better than everyone else because Pike puts him on the floor with only the better defensive players?

Sorry.....don't buy that AT ALL!

This isn't a stat per say. It is a measurement of how many points are scored when a player is on the floor.

I am sorry we are better with him on the floor on D despite his inability to rebound. Our D is based on switching and he by far gets this more than any other of our bigs. In the Pike Defense this is so important.
No, my argument is that individual defensive metrics are tenuous at best. No individual player plays defense in a vacuum. It's not like field goal percentage, assists, or other stats where you are actively doing an individual activity that is either successful or not successful.

Defense is a team concept. You can do everything right defensively, but if your teammate isn't where he needs to be, it won't matter. Or you could do everything wrong, but the players around you are plus help defenders.

Defensive efficiency is a team stat... more specifically a lineup stat, but that sort of data is not tracked. Same goes for box plus minus, which is a combination of offense and defense.
  • Like
Reactions: PSAL_Hoops

OT: Stormy and Potentially Snowy from about 2/8-2/22? (pg 9); OG Thread: Cold and Potentially Snowy Pattern Likely for Most of January

Tonight's 0Z models continue to show a stormy and probably snowy pattern ahead, but the long range is difficult to forecast, as illustrated by the global models being all over the place for the possible 2/8 storm with outcomes ranging from a significant snowstorm (GFS/CMC) to nada (UK) to a cutter that brings a bit of initial snow and then mostly rain (Euro). And after that, more storms are appearing in the long range guidance. While it's always dicey for snow for our area (given the risk of warmer temps/rain), areas well NW of 95 and especially New England look to possibly get a lot of snow in this pattern.

However, we do have a legitimate wintry threat for 2/5-6 coming into view. Still high uncertainty, but the GFS has an inch or so of snow/mix and some rain falling late Weds into Thursday for the area, the CMC has a general 1-2" of snow/mix falling through Thurs early morning followed by some rain, the UK has a general 3-5" falling for the area, ending as a bit of rain, and the Euro has a bit of sleet/freezing rain to start followed by mostly rain. If we get a bit more consensus by tomorrow night (3 days out), will likely start a thread on this.

Also, almost all of the models have an inch or maybe 2" falling late Sunday night, mostly along/N of 78, but there could be coatings to 1/2" for most of CNJ south of 78, including the 95 corridor, but probably no snow towards and south of 276/195. This would melt quickly after sunrise on Monday with highs near 50F for most. Nice graphic below showing the very active jet stream/storm track aimed in our general direction particularly during the 2nd week of February - likely storms and some could be snowy (but no guarantees yet).

Login to view embedded media
Haven't really done deep look at model runs and whatnot, but the nifty upper air graphic doesn't show us in the entrance region of those jet streaks. Obviously this is just more model output and actual jet streak positioning is TBD, but as modeled above, NJ doesn't really catch the areas of greatest PVA from the amplified jet. Impressive, but you don't really want them sitting directly on top of you for greatest diffluence and PVA.
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT