This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

The other consideration to make with the analysis.......
The Iowa game we were great when Ace and Dylan were off the floor together. I think we win that game if Dylan was out.

is this supposed to be a way of excusing the coaching staff? or just something that is supposed to help us cope with the failure?

it does, unfortunately.

fluoxetine said:

This is not correct. 20-15 is .571. 19-14 is .576.

Click to expand...

Ok - nevermind. I did it fast this AM heading out the door. The concept I was driving at still stands though I think because on equal total game count pre-tournament it would actually be 17-14 vs 18-13 and then a comparison of 18-14 vs 20-15.

The point I was getting at with this though is simply that if 17-14 vs 18-13 is what “counts”as your record well then, that means it’s actually the case that a home game vs. Monmouth has more meaning to the committee (since it’s part of the original 17 wins) than a neutral BIG tournament game. My contention is the tournament games ought to at least “count” as much as the pre-season home tune ups if the advanced metrics from the games count in NET.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

I think the bottom line is we are better offensively "healthy" (DUH), but at best no better defensively "healthy".

I have a tough time thinking the added offense is enough to put us over the hump in more than 1 or 2 games.

Obviously 1 game would be enough to give us an at large hope.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

NickRU714 said:

Additional note - It appears a SHU fan agreed with you. Take that for what it’s worth.

Click to expand...

Dear Lord!!! Am I tainted now?

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

I have no issues. I have Directv and switch between HDMI ports to watch multiple events.

They are due to lose a close one just like USC was 12-0 when scorring 77+ pts.

minnysoda
wisky
iowa
merryland
usc
indy
missagain

last : 1-0
ytd : 86-62

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

rutgersdave said:

GOOG PE 23 MSFT PE 32 META PE 27 and I’m still cautious. Yes, some stocks on this board are speculating but I’m sure they are only putting in a small amount.

Added to AMZN, CRM, and GOOG.

Click to expand...

Be careful looking at PE’s when a lot of the money spent by these companies has been capitalized, not expensed. In many cases, capitalized costs end up being amortized quicker, or written down. If that happens, earnings could change quickly.

Had the spreadsheet open and just needed to delete the OOC games....

....and noticed I fvcked up as I had UCLA in the wrong pile which makes a huge difference!

B1G only

B1G only rank in ()

healthy
O 1.194 (6)
D 1.038 (16)
diff .156 (10)

not healthy
O 1.1183 (16)
D 1.0192 (12)
diff .099 (16)