RU shot 21/43 for 49% from 2 point range. RU shot 6/24 from 3 point range for 25%. If they had just said **** it, we’re not taking a three tonight and shot 11/24 (46%) on the additional two point shots then we end up tied. Does this jacked up logic make total sense? No, because no one would go an entire game without shooting a 3. However, this team can’t shoot, it’s not a strength, and they really should be focused on playing strong defense (like the 2nd half) while trying to score as close to the basket as possible as this is the best formula for THIS GROUP to compete and possibly win. It goes against all rules of analytics and offensive efficiency of today’s game, but this team is not built to shoot. The threes they take, whether it ends up being 20 or 25 are wasted opportunities as they’re not making them. Less threes, shoot more twos, slow down the game and DEFEND, DEFEND, DEFEND is the best formula for wins for THIS GROUP.