ADVERTISEMENT

BACATOLOGY: 3/11 NCAA Tournament Analysis***Rutgers 95% in***

Hope the OSU game kicks in as a tiebreaker
Yeah I hope that, all our close losses, and the way we played in the BTT are all taken into consideration by the committee. If so, I think we avoid Dayton
 
Fwiw we're back to third team in, a hair of Pittsburgh on average seed but, again, way ahead on number of brackets that include us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
We’re safely in, imo. Not even listed as “on the bubble” during ESPN’s latest segment

It’s just a matter now of Dayton or no Dayton
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg
The biggest issue with quadrants etc is that a 1 point loss to Seton Hall (78 NET) gets thrown in the "bad loss" pile but a 31 point neutral site loss to Michigan (62 NET) is a don't-worry-about-it Q2 loss
 
The biggest issue with quadrants etc is that a 1 point loss to Seton Hall (78 NET) gets thrown in the "bad loss" pile but a 31 point neutral site loss to Michigan (62 NET) is a don't-worry-about-it Q2 loss
IMO the only WTF loss we had was against Minnesota and that was by a point on a last second shot. Temple without 2 starters who beat #1 team in country, Seton Hall which is rivalry game and Nebraska is a tournament team in ACC. I will also add that both of our games against Ohio St were when they had Key and playing great
 
Hope/think the OSU “tiebreaker” and solid Net (compared to other bubbles) keeps us out of Dayton.

Numbers saying 1% Dayton is certifiably insane, though. I’m in the ~30% range (that we’re in Dayton) personally
 
if you factor in OSU...should be a cakewalk...no?

meaning...if it's a coinflip before OSU...doesnt OSU move us in to the category of being a lock for not going to Dayton? Esp with all bid stealers being done?

No. The OSU game doesn’t eliminate our losses to Minny, Neby, Seton Hall, Temple, and our not so great play down the stretch. It’s those reasons we’re a possibility for Dayton
 
Does the committee take into account the margin of losses?

Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.

I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.

I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
 
No. The OSU game doesn’t eliminate our losses to Minny, Neby, Seton Hall, Temple, and our not so great play down the stretch. It’s those reasons we’re a possibility for Dayton
you're jumping around.

when factoring in all those things...we're on the edge...right?

THEN, you factor in OSU...and logic would suggest that moves us comfortably off the edge.

I get we're Rutgers fans...and we expect the worst...but following logic should dictate we're safe. And if we go to Dayton, we would have gotten screwed.
 
Does the committee take into account the margin of losses?

Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.

I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.

I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
Definitely a factor, who knows how much. Also already factored in by our solid Net
 
you're jumping around.

when factoring in all those things...we're on the edge...right?

THEN, you factor in OSU...and logic would suggest that moves us comfortably off the edge.

I get we're Rutgers fans...and we expect the worst...but following logic should dictate we're safe. And if we go to Dayton, we would have gotten screwed.

Factoring in what happened at OSU isn’t gonna move the needle that much. They’re a non Tourny team that even if taken into account, we beat by 1. Not a huge difference maker imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUsojo
The biggest issue with quadrants etc is that a 1 point loss to Seton Hall (78 NET) gets thrown in the "bad loss" pile but a 31 point neutral site loss to Michigan (62 NET) is a don't-worry-about-it Q2 loss
There is also an assumption that losing to the #119 team is basically exactly the same as losing to #120. Well, Temple also beat Houston and Villanova. How many other teams ranked next to them had that ceiling?

Is losing to Temple like losing to Cal State Fullerton? Rating says yes.
 
I think our hopes of a 10 are out. 9 teams from BIG is a lot, and with PSU's run we are clearly 9th team. I hope committee doesn't make example of RU for BIG's poor performance in NCAAs recently and the disasterous Minnesota game. Unlikely, but possible. We are not a lock, though I have us as an 11 No Dayton.
 
Does the committee take into account the margin of losses?

Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.

I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.

I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
I mean if it’s something we’re looking at on here I would like to assume it’s something they would look at too. And if so, the way a lot of the teams around the bubble got absolutely blown out in their conference tournaments can only help us I would think
 
It wasn’t a win though. The committee isn’t going to count it as a win
But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and GSGS
But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.

It certainly “could”…but again I don’t think it’s gonna make a huge impact. If we do avoid Dayton…that game is probably a huge factor and I’d stand corrected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatsam98
But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.
I agree that Ohio State "win" is what gets us out of Dayton. But it's such a close call, anything can happen. There are legit reasons they could cite as last four out.
 
Does the committee take into account the margin of losses?

Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.

I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.

I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
Yes it does
 
Bac is eerily silent this morning. I’m envisioning him holed up in his basement performing final bacatology calculations.

Death Calculate GIF by jjjjjohn
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT