Hope the OSU game kicks in as a tiebreakerYeah based on that website it looks like we’re basically a coin flip with Mississippi State for the last bye
Hope the OSU game kicks in as a tiebreakerYeah based on that website it looks like we’re basically a coin flip with Mississippi State for the last bye
99% out of Dayton - I rarely claim certainty, lol...I think this is correct. Anyone saying with certainty we’re out of Dayton is being silly.
We dropped a spot in bracket matrix this morning. Now the 2nd to last team in. Weird.
Yes. We’re now the 2nd team in. But as others said…it’s more average rankings than number of brackets. So it may be deceivingWe ve been the third team in for awhile
99% out of Dayton - I rarely claim certainty, lol...
FWIW, The Athletic article this morning has #11 playing #6 TCU in Denver, and the winner playing Grand Canyon/Gonzaga.
Yep. Especially since the greatest board predictor of all time (plum street) predicted Dayton in mid February !I think this is correct. Anyone saying with certainty we’re out of Dayton is being silly.
Yeah I hope that, all our close losses, and the way we played in the BTT are all taken into consideration by the committee. If so, I think we avoid DaytonHope the OSU game kicks in as a tiebreaker
Lunardi has us in the played their way in categoryWe’re safely in, imo. Not even listed as “on the bubble” during ESPN’s latest segment
It’s just a matter now of Dayton or no Dayton
IMO the only WTF loss we had was against Minnesota and that was by a point on a last second shot. Temple without 2 starters who beat #1 team in country, Seton Hall which is rivalry game and Nebraska is a tournament team in ACC. I will also add that both of our games against Ohio St were when they had Key and playing greatThe biggest issue with quadrants etc is that a 1 point loss to Seton Hall (78 NET) gets thrown in the "bad loss" pile but a 31 point neutral site loss to Michigan (62 NET) is a don't-worry-about-it Q2 loss
if you factor in OSU...should be a cakewalk...no?I think this is correct. Anyone saying with certainty we’re out of Dayton is being silly.
Lunardi has us in the played their way in category
if you factor in OSU...should be a cakewalk...no?
meaning...if it's a coinflip before OSU...doesnt OSU move us in to the category of being a lock for not going to Dayton? Esp with all bid stealers being done?
you're jumping around.No. The OSU game doesn’t eliminate our losses to Minny, Neby, Seton Hall, Temple, and our not so great play down the stretch. It’s those reasons we’re a possibility for Dayton
Definitely a factor, who knows how much. Also already factored in by our solid NetDoes the committee take into account the margin of losses?
Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.
I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.
I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
you're jumping around.
when factoring in all those things...we're on the edge...right?
THEN, you factor in OSU...and logic would suggest that moves us comfortably off the edge.
I get we're Rutgers fans...and we expect the worst...but following logic should dictate we're safe. And if we go to Dayton, we would have gotten screwed.
that's absurd. absurd.Factoring in what happened at OSU isn’t gonna move the needle that much. They’re a non Tourny team that even if taken into account, we beat by 1. Not a huge difference maker imo.
It would’ve been a quad 2 road victory, and would make our conference road record 5-5. It’s significant.Factoring in what happened at OSU isn’t gonna move the needle that much. They’re a non Tourny team that even if taken into account, we beat by 1. Not a huge difference maker imo.
that's absurd. absurd.
you're the one being silly now.
There is also an assumption that losing to the #119 team is basically exactly the same as losing to #120. Well, Temple also beat Houston and Villanova. How many other teams ranked next to them had that ceiling?The biggest issue with quadrants etc is that a 1 point loss to Seton Hall (78 NET) gets thrown in the "bad loss" pile but a 31 point neutral site loss to Michigan (62 NET) is a don't-worry-about-it Q2 loss
It would’ve been a quad 2 road victory, and would make our conference road record 5-5. It’s significant.
I mean if it’s something we’re looking at on here I would like to assume it’s something they would look at too. And if so, the way a lot of the teams around the bubble got absolutely blown out in their conference tournaments can only help us I would thinkDoes the committee take into account the margin of losses?
Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.
I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.
I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.It wasn’t a win though. The committee isn’t going to count it as a win
But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.
I agree that Ohio State "win" is what gets us out of Dayton. But it's such a close call, anything can happen. There are legit reasons they could cite as last four out.But the committee is “considering” the game in its calculus because of the Big Ten’s admission that we should have won. This could very well tip the balance between us ending up in Dayton or ending up with a non-Dayton 10 or more likely 11 seed.
Yes it doesDoes the committee take into account the margin of losses?
Our worst margin of defeat was 13 points (twice), once on the road to MSU (70-57) and once at home to Michigan (58-45). Other than those two games, we’ve lost by the following point margins: 6, 7, 1* (OSU), 2, 9, 11, 6, 9, 10, 1, 12, 5.
I’d venture a guess that all of the other teams on the bubble — and frankly most teams PERIOD — all have losses of 20+ points.
I have to think this is another data point in our favor, however slight.
no we are the third team safely inYes. We’re now the 2nd team in. But as others said…it’s more average rankings than number of brackets. So it may be deceiving
so 96.6% lol. who are those four? really?Rutgers now in 114 of 118 brackets on the matrix