ADVERTISEMENT

BACATOLOGY: 3/11 NCAA Tournament Analysis***Rutgers 95% in***

you got the wrong guy if you think I'm sitting here smoking a cigar just yet lol.
You know how old I am and how long I've been dying for Rutgers right? If not I've got the scares to show you ..HA. 🤞 :Hammer Nails:
Ha. Still think there is a 5% chance we are left out because…Rutgers. Too many years of being a Rutgers, Mets, Knicks fan, I guess. It would probably be UNC who suddenly and mysteriously jumps 15 spots to knock us out too. I’ll take 95% though.
 
huh...why? his track record is solid and feel like he is someone we can trust.

I agree that it would be good if he elaborated a bit more, but one doesnt need to reveal the actual source to be credible.

but, we're probably opening up a can of worms in this thread on this topic...lol


it needs to be totally clarified...did the ncaa tell him, there are other reports that this wasnt said, would not be hard for someone who covers RU to clarify
 
it needs to be totally clarified...did the ncaa tell him, there are other reports that this wasnt said, would not be hard for someone who covers RU to clarify
agree...just saying that can be done without revealing the actual source.

surprised the NJAM crew havent run this down
 
THE only good thing about Dayton is we get the night to ourselves like last year. Brey was right in that there was no really better game than that one.. good exposure in its own way. (see, I'm already trying to resign myself for the disappointment).

ok. Time to start the day and get off the laptop. See ya at post 6.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766
We should feel pretty good about at least playing in Dayton. But we have also given the committee ammunition to have us last four out, if they wanna make an example of Big Ten’s disappointing Tournament play in recent years.
They could’ve easily done that last year and didn’t. I think it’s pretty clear committee doesn’t care about last year and has consistently shown that they respect the B1G.
 
Agreed. I'm just saying sometimes the committee is weird. That's why bac has it at 95% and not 100%.
A possible nightmare situation : who knows how much politics plays in getting into the tourney etc. Last year many would say that we were fortunate to get in- can the reverse occur this year given the “break “ we received last year due to committee politics?
I’m expecting to hear our name called but I am nervous given the bad losses etc and some of the negative metrics etc that Wachrel and others have pointed out.
As much as I don’t want Dayton again, I would however sign up for it now.
 
I just feel that last year the thing committee valued the most was quality wins. We have that, and the added bonus of some of the best metrics inside the bubble. What people forget is we weren’t even last team in last year, we were third to last team in. We had more room than we believed. I feel something similar is going to happen again.
 
the strong runs by Marquette and Texas A&M in their conference resumes have boosted Mississippi State's resume where I am going to push them a tick above Rutgers in my bracket
 
A possible nightmare situation : who knows how much politics plays in getting into the tourney etc. Last year many would say that we were fortunate to get in- can the reverse occur this year given the “break “ we received last year due to committee politics?
I’m expecting to hear our name called but I am nervous given the bad losses etc and some of the negative metrics etc that Wachrel and others have pointed out.
As much as I don’t want Dayton again, I would however sign up for it now.
Everyone at the bottom has some bad metrics. If not, they would be squarely in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and RUsojo
the strong runs by Marquette and Texas A&M in their conference resumes have boosted Mississippi State's resume where I am going to push them a tick above Rutgers in my bracket
Fair enough.

But what about USC? Take a close look at their resume and think for a minute about the possibility of the committee deciding ASU is not a tourney team. Are they really a sure fire lock for a bye then? They’d have a pair of home wins over UCLA and Auburn against the field (and yeah - they beat Vermont by 2 - big deal). A 13 point home loss to FGCU is far worse than anything on our resume…
 
A possible nightmare situation : who knows how much politics plays in getting into the tourney etc. Last year many would say that we were fortunate to get in- can the reverse occur this year given the “break “ we received last year due to committee politics?
I’m expecting to hear our name called but I am nervous given the bad losses etc and some of the negative metrics etc that Wachrel and others have pointed out.
As much as I don’t want Dayton again, I would however sign up for it now.
All this stuff is commonsense. Rutgers has the resume to be in as a 10 or 11. But that doesn't mean they will be. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Committee make an example of them for Big Ten’s terrible track record in Tournament recently. The Minnesota game put us in this position. Also, beating a Michigan that only scored one basket in 19:00 minutes 2nd half isn't exactly something to hang hat on as last win.
 
I think to Brad's point, I think 2 out of the following 3 get 11s with a bye: Providence, Miss St, Rutgers. I think Rutgers is 1, Miss St 2 and Providence 3. One can argue to flip Miss St to a 1 and us to a 2, but I don't see Providence in the top 2 of 3 with their resume.

The issue is none of them are clear winners, so it's going to be subjective based on what the committee cherry picks.
 
RU Screw would be us going to Dayton

if we are left out completely, that would be straight up robbery...and a complete scandal.

You can surely make an argument we did get the RU screw if we’re left out completely. Sure, that’s fair.

But again, too many bad losses and self inflicted punishment to say we were screwed if we get l sent to Dayton. I think our resume screams Dayton
 
  • Like
Reactions: InPikeWeTrust
What about the strong run by Penn St? Does it boost our resume?
yes but not as much because Marquette is now a predicted 2 seed and A&M is moving to 5 possibly. PSU is in the 9 spot at best an 8

the Marquette win by MSU was non conference and they also have a non conference win over TCU
 
Fair enough.

But what about USC? Take a close look at their resume and think for a minute about the possibility of the committee deciding ASU is not a tourney team. Are they really a sure fire lock for a bye then? They’d have a pair of home wins over UCLA and Auburn against the field (and yeah - they beat Vermont by 2 - big deal). A 13 point home loss to FGCU is far worse than anything on our resume…


not a big fan of uscs resume thats why they are a 10, the win over ucla like with asu is the biggie, in some ways i prefer asus resume. If RU cleaned up the minnesota loss they would be probably be the top 10 right now
 
Geez, there are so many scenarios back and forth ,by so many people someone is gonna claim to be a genius. But the truth is , some crap always sticks to the wall when thrown there.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT