BACATOLOGY: 3/11 NCAA Tournament Analysis***Rutgers 95% in***
- Thread starter bac2therac
- Start date
Let’s see if they expose the big ten again and get knocked out early
Wow what a game . But I won’t be surprised if one or both those teams get bounced early
And you saw how they handle pressure backcourt
Book should be out on them in that respect
Stop it. Really? I am a huge fan and I am by my computer ready to book airline tickets the seconds after our name is called
agree...I may disagree with you, but you're a great fan
the trolling comments are uncalled for IMHO
since airlines give 24hr cancel policy generally, you should just book now and cancel the one we dont end up in haha.
I agree with your general points, but I think the NET SOS is the average ranking of your opponents which is not a particularly good way to measure SOS.
The top number contains the bottom number, making the bottom number irrelevant.
Put on YES! Nets and #1 team Nuggets in a nail biter. Nets up 1 with 23 seconds left.
did you see on the final PSU inbound, the clock started on time but froze at 2.7 seconds before eventually starting up again? Good thing PSU didnt get that final shot and make it or else there would def be some controversy!
Make the tournament. Palm had us in Dayton but said we gave committee reasons to leave us out. The other weasely guy said he's leave us out but thinks we probably get in.
I mean to be fair the 2nd comment is positive. Who cares what that guy would do?
@fluoxetine
Fyi.. I'm not one the negative side of that debate so you know. I just know this board and the fans of other schools.
If only they didn't put high seeds in the 1st round, then we'd have nothing to worry about.
Someone should suggest that.
Yeah much less worry if they left tournament at 64.
Where do we find these people ???
64 isn't a problem.
68 is fine.
Play 4 1st round games with teams ranked 61-68 for the last 4 seeds (#16).
Instead of teams 65-68 and approx 46-49.
Good lord it's not rocket science.
This thread's prediction was garbage. 95 percent lol...I believe it was 'lock' briefly after Michigan win lol
This is exercise was another reason I thought we’d be out of the field of 64 and in Dayton. Unfortunately it went the other way.
Think a lot of people underestimated least year RU in was the exception not the new precedent.
Clean resumes matter and Q3 losses are usually worse than non-high Q1 wins.
it was never 100% and when 95% of matrix has them in I still stand by my percentages
Bac is still good at this . But he had us about 6 spots away then what the committee did . It was a bad fail , but I am not ready to write bac off . It’s good stuff he provides . He gets a shot next year at redemption
Similar threads
