What is going on with blocking/charge calls? I swear I see no rhyme or reason. Every time there is contact just flip a coin. How long can it go on like this without some change? Is there any discussion of altering the rule or how it's called?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah. It's different. It used to be the O player had the right of way and the D player needed to get to the spot first and have feet set. There were still lots of tough calls, but now the feet set thing is gone. It's now based on...frankly I have no idea what it's based on. I guess if the O player lowers the shoulder or pushes off that's gonna get called. But for body contact it's a total mystery to me.where have you been for the last 50 years? Its a judgment call. They put in the Circle, they added the flop, and they still can't get it right. Consistency has never been an attribute for refing. And there are so many other examples...
There are a lot more charge calls these days - the criteria for establishing defensive position seems to have eased a bit.
Agreed, I instantly called for the offensive foul when that play happened. Looked clear. I couldn't believe Crowl wasn't whistled when his shoulder took Paul out for a couple of minutes when he hedged on the screen.Today was a clear charge, he gave Hyatt a forearm shiver and Hyatt had ground…
Cliff's "and 1" was a joke, but it was the difference between a win and a loss.I forget who Wahl gave a forearm shiver to as he drove to the hoop and got the block call. Blatant. Announcers didn’t say a word about it. Cliff’s ‘and 1’ shouldn’t have been. Point is, teams get calls when they are aggressive taking it to the rim. Has always been that way.
Not entirely inconsistent. Better players, especially when having a good game almost always get the 50/50 calls in their favor and subs never do. Remember, it’s entertainment first, competiton second.There are a lot more, but I agree with OP that there seems to be little rhyme or reason to what constitutes a block, a charge, or "play on". Definitely inconsistent game to game - but frequently even within the same game.
Nah. It's different. It used to be the O player had the right of way and the D player needed to get to the spot first and have feet set. There were still lots of tough calls, but now the feet set thing is gone.
Agree 100%. Except that it's getting to be all people care about is three point shooting. When everyone is shooting threes no one has to worry about block/charge calls.Honestly you’d think basketball would want to keep the old way (offensive player has right of way unless defender establishes clear position) as that help offense - and don’t all these leagues want to encourage offense these days?
I asked about this in a different thread but no answer.Agreed, I instantly called for the offensive foul when that play happened. Looked clear. I couldn't believe Crowl wasn't whistled when his shoulder took Paul out for a couple of minutes when he hedged on the screen.
What is going on with blocking/charge calls? I swear I see no rhyme or reason. Every time there is contact just flip a coin. How long can it go on like this without some change? Is there any discussion of altering the rule or how it's called?
The call involving Cliff had nothing to do with block/charge. The referee called a hold. I expected the basket to count with a flop called on top of it, because Cliff clearly did not foul him. Apparently, the referee saw the defender doing something on the ground as Cliff went by for the dunk after what appeared to be a flop.I forget who Wahl gave a forearm shiver to as he drove to the hoop and got the block call. Blatant. Announcers didn’t say a word about it. Cliff’s ‘and 1’ shouldn’t have been. Point is, teams get calls when they are aggressive taking it to the rim. Has always been that way.
It was a hold, not a block called on that play.Cliff's "and 1" was a joke, but it was the difference between a win and a loss.
Not seeing the calls from the proper angle doesn’t keep refs from making them. I find it infuriating when a ref 40 feet from the play makes a call and the closer guy did not whistle it. The close guy should obviously have jurisdiction over the nearby space.Just curious what everyone thinks about this one......
Would adding a 4th Ref result in better calls, more calls, less calls if the Refs are in a better position on the court to see contact on a play ?
My contention is that Refs are not seeing plays at the proper angle to make the correct calls. They "see" things that are not there because they are out of position. Resulting in more calls and wrong calls.
Maybe I missed something, but on the Cliff and one play, baseline ref called the foul and definitely didn't signal a hold on that play (hand grabbing his other wrist would be a hold). Play starts about 2:43 into the game highlights below. As was already mentioned in the Cliff and one thread, Ref signaled a block.It was a hold, not a block called on that play.
There's no excuse for any official to be out of position since they started using 3 man crews.
Not seeing the calls from the proper angle doesn’t keep refs from making them. I find it infuriating when a ref 40 feet from the play makes a call and the closer guy did not whistle it. The close guy should obviously have jurisdiction over the nearby space.
Scarlet Shack.. Just curious. Do you notice any difference in the quality of officiating now, bad/missed calls, etc, compared to when you played at RU?A real problem , one that starts with an official making a call not in their “zone” , and a decent percentage of the time , because they are not in position
Good referring requires moving a lot more in position to have the correct angles , based on player movements , to not be blocked , should be constantly moving 5-6 feet in each directors
Instead …they are almost always stationary ….
I find it partially due to fatigue and working too many games
Didn't know @Scarlet Shack played at Rutgers. What era? Cool!Scarlet Shack.. Just curious. Do you notice any difference in the quality of officiating now, bad/missed calls, etc, compared to when you played at RU?
Scarlet Shack.. Just curious. Do you notice any difference in the quality of officiating now, bad/missed calls, etc, compared to when you played at RU?
You’re missing nothing . I was a foulI asked about this in a different thread but no answer.
The play where Paul got the stinger, I am not as up to date on basketball rules as much as football but Paul was driving and the defender just jumped into his lane, feet still moving and completely blocked his lane with obvious hard contact.
What am I missing?
Oh shoot. How embarrassing.. I obviously interpreted a few posts from the past the wrong way. But thanks for answering.Not a RU player , lol…..