He was ranked right where he should be.
Yes that, but he’s gone on and on about how good Simpson was, rankings mean nothing, etc.Carino thought this team would be good preseason ?
You can’t believe any of the practice and secret scrimmage nonsense
I know he did say the team would be “entertaining “.Yes that, but he’s gone on and on about how good Simpson was, rankings mean nothing, etc.
It’s entertaining because it’s like going to a comedy showI know he did say the team would be “entertaining “.
Lots of bad preseason takes from guy in the know.
That’s why it’s legendary when average Joe fan nails predictions.
I agree. It was obvious from the start we were gonna be awful and wasn’t hard to predict with what we lost. Amazingly bad amateurish takes imo. I think they’re are definitely better basketball minds out there they just don’t cover Rutgers.Carino and every other beat writer no absolutely nothing.
They rely 100 percent on what the coaches tell them.
So, a couple of things here.What we are watching and not quite understanding.......we are watching a player playing more minutes and developing but the program and fans no longer have the patience to watch it.
This is NOT going to be popular and I know fans are going to run with this and take it out of context.
BUT
What if I told you, fans are watching a reduced version of Jacob Young, when discussing Derek Simpson... ..don't go crazy, because I am looking at the numbers for Young at Texas in his 1st 2 seasons.
I am NOT saying Simpson is in the same area code of player, athletic abilities, size, speed or confidence or cockiness of a Jacob Young. Young is the Top 0.1% caliber athlete that in on the planet. I believe that if you put Jacob Young into a football camp for a full year and taught him how to play cornerback or defense, he is THAT good of an athlete and could figure it out.....Simpson is NOT that athletic etc
But Young was very VERY erratic in his 1st 2 years at Texas....the shooting percentage people here, would not have ever wanted Young as a transfer in, if you looked at his stats. All that fans looked at, was he was ranked in the Top 150 on Rivals out of HS, so, nothing else matters.
Young shot 28.7 from the field and 22.7 from 3 as a frosh ....78 from the FT line.....16 minutes a game.
Young shot 41.3 from the field and 32.3 from 3.....he dipped to 68.2 from the FT line.
Simpson.....frosh 37.4 FG%......21.7 from 3......79.3 from FT line....20 minutes per game
Simpson this year has dipped for sure, but 31.9 FG percentage and 28.3 from 3 ...83.8 from the line.....25 minutes a game.
The RU fan is not going to comprehend improving players and we saw Jacob Young in Year 4 and Year 5, AFTER a full season redshirting and sitting out at RU... Young had a full season to practice and get used to RU.....
And Young in his 1st 15 games at RU was NOT GOOD.....he was a turnover machine.....he was very erratic, but his efforts and defense on the ball was something that the team could use. But Young in Year FOUR and FIVE, was the finished product or the player we remember....because RU as fans, didn't have to watch Young implode the way he did at Texas.
Simpson is just not as good as Young athletically, but he has some things to build upon. And if Young could improve by Years 4 and 5, I am guessing or expecting that Simpson will improve the rest of this year and in Years 3 and 4. And Simpson this year, just doesn't have the same caliber of support or players around him, like Young did at RU.......the circumstances are very very different.
Would it be more convenient to say JMike Davis and Jacob Young as frosh and sophomores, is the better comparison.......?? Maybe....
To recap, I am NOT saying Simpson is the same player as Jacob Young.....I'm not even saying JMike Davis is the same player as Young.....I am saying it looks VERY similar stat wise as underclassmen.
Just because you can point to one player who “may” have some similar attributes (I don’t even agree with this premise) who developed over time, doesn’t mean you can extrapolate anything about Derek Simpson’s development. Some players just can’t shoot and never improve much. As Rick Pitino says, the hardest thing to teach is shooting.What we are watching and not quite understanding.......we are watching a player playing more minutes and developing but the program and fans no longer have the patience to watch it.
This is NOT going to be popular and I know fans are going to run with this and take it out of context.
BUT
What if I told you, fans are watching a reduced version of Jacob Young, when discussing Derek Simpson... ..don't go crazy, because I am looking at the numbers for Young at Texas in his 1st 2 seasons.
I am NOT saying Simpson is in the same area code of player, athletic abilities, size, speed or confidence or cockiness of a Jacob Young. Young is the Top 0.1% caliber athlete that in on the planet. I believe that if you put Jacob Young into a football camp for a full year and taught him how to play cornerback or defense, he is THAT good of an athlete and could figure it out.....Simpson is NOT that athletic etc
But Young was very VERY erratic in his 1st 2 years at Texas....the shooting percentage people here, would not have ever wanted Young as a transfer in, if you looked at his stats. All that fans looked at, was he was ranked in the Top 150 on Rivals out of HS, so, nothing else matters.
Young shot 28.7 from the field and 22.7 from 3 as a frosh ....78 from the FT line.....16 minutes a game.
Young shot 41.3 from the field and 32.3 from 3.....he dipped to 68.2 from the FT line.
Simpson.....frosh 37.4 FG%......21.7 from 3......79.3 from FT line....20 minutes per game
Simpson this year has dipped for sure, but 31.9 FG percentage and 28.3 from 3 ...83.8 from the line.....25 minutes a game.
The RU fan is not going to comprehend improving players and we saw Jacob Young in Year 4 and Year 5, AFTER a full season redshirting and sitting out at RU... Young had a full season to practice and get used to RU.....
And Young in his 1st 15 games at RU was NOT GOOD.....he was a turnover machine.....he was very erratic, but his efforts and defense on the ball was something that the team could use. But Young in Year FOUR and FIVE, was the finished product or the player we remember....because RU as fans, didn't have to watch Young implode the way he did at Texas.
Simpson is just not as good as Young athletically, but he has some things to build upon. And if Young could improve by Years 4 and 5, I am guessing or expecting that Simpson will improve the rest of this year and in Years 3 and 4. And Simpson this year, just doesn't have the same caliber of support or players around him, like Young did at RU.......the circumstances are very very different.
Would it be more convenient to say JMike Davis and Jacob Young as frosh and sophomores, is the better comparison.......?? Maybe....
To recap, I am NOT saying Simpson is the same player as Jacob Young.....I'm not even saying JMike Davis is the same player as Young.....I am saying it looks VERY similar stat wise as underclassmen.
He eventually gets the “talk”
In a game he went 4-15 from the field. It was ridiculousCarino took a victory lap because Derek hit a last second shot to beat Stonehill....that take ranks up with the doozies that Hawk has posted this year
Carino took a victory lap because Derek hit a last second shot to beat Stonehill....that take ranks up with the doozies that Hawk has posted this year
Was that the bank shot?Carino took a victory lap because Derek hit a last second shot to beat Stonehill....that take ranks up with the doozies that Hawk has posted this year
No it was a clean make.Was that the bank shot?
Tip of the hat. 🎩. That would be me.His Kamikaze attacks to the basket would work better if he wasn't a gnat. Due to his physically weak stature, he rarely makes it.
(Credit: to poster in game thread for perfectly describing his drives to the basket with "Kamikaze".)
Here's the thing, and this opinion will probably be as unpopular as many of yours.Which doozies....LMAO......please stop and tell me where your doozy is on Mag being the reason RU fell apart last year.....
At some point, shouldn't you watch the games on the court?? Did I miss the last 3 games??
If you want to take a victory lap because I believe that this year's backcourt was going to be better than last year, I own that 100%....but I also added that playing Simpson, Davis and Griffiths is more important now, so we have someone with experience on next year's roster?roster?? Are you saying that's a doozy??? LMAO
I'll wait to see what your Mag take is....I had no expectations that you and others kept parroting.
What appears to be a doozy is now being written as FACT, by folks like Politi and others.....that this season is about getting Simpson, Davis and Griffiths more game minutes and playing time for next year....that is my doozy??
That can only happen if Mulcahy and Spencer are not here, playing 32 minutes a game.....that's a doozy??
I'll wait on your Mag take, after 3 straight games of no points.....
I have been right now for 8 months, and it's now being finally seen as reality......the reality on Mag being the reason RU fell apart last year, is now also looking flimsy at best....
Which doozies....LMAO......please stop and tell me where your doozy is on Mag being the reason RU fell apart last year.....
At some point, shouldn't you watch the games on the court?? Did I miss the last 3 games??
If you want to take a victory lap because I believe that this year's backcourt was going to be better than last year, I own that 100%....but I also added that playing Simpson, Davis and Griffiths is more important now, so we have someone with experience on next year's roster?roster?? Are you saying that's a doozy??? LMAO
I'll wait to see what your Mag take is....I had no expectations that you and others kept parroting.
What appears to be a doozy is now being written as FACT, by folks like Politi and others.....that this season is about getting Simpson, Davis and Griffiths more game minutes and playing time for next year....that is my doozy??
That can only happen if Mulcahy and Spencer are not here, playing 32 minutes a game.....that's a doozy??
I'll wait on your Mag take, after 3 straight games of no points.....
I have been right now for 8 months, and it's now being finally seen as reality......the reality on Mag being the reason RU fell apart last year, is now also looking flimsy at best....
You've been so wrong and won't admit it to the point where most used to think you were a good poster and you're turning yourself into a laughing stockWhich doozies....LMAO......please stop and tell me where your doozy is on Mag being the reason RU fell apart last year.....
At some point, shouldn't you watch the games on the court?? Did I miss the last 3 games??
If you want to take a victory lap because I believe that this year's backcourt was going to be better than last year, I own that 100%....but I also added that playing Simpson, Davis and Griffiths is more important now, so we have someone with experience on next year's roster?roster?? Are you saying that's a doozy??? LMAO
I'll wait to see what your Mag take is....I had no expectations that you and others kept parroting.
What appears to be a doozy is now being written as FACT, by folks like Politi and others.....that this season is about getting Simpson, Davis and Griffiths more game minutes and playing time for next year....that is my doozy??
That can only happen if Mulcahy and Spencer are not here, playing 32 minutes a game.....that's a doozy??
I'll wait on your Mag take, after 3 straight games of no points.....
I have been right now for 8 months, and it's now being finally seen as reality......the reality on Mag being the reason RU fell apart last year, is now also looking flimsy at best....
At what point does Simpson's "horrific shootong" become a problem for you?Simpson still the best foul shooter on the team.
Still quickest player on the team
And after Cliff, the best defensive player on the team.
Despite horrific shooting, he almost had a double double yesterday.
Despite a bad game shooting he lead the team in rebounds!!! 8!!! And tied for the lead in assists.
He still won the Stonehill game, half court shot at Indiana and foul shots won the game.
Dominated the OSU game and almost had a triple double against Nebraska.
He won the PSU and Indiana game last year.
Yep he needs to get stronger and make more shots but he’s still only a sophomore.
Fan base ridiculously hard on him and news flash JMike isn’t a point guard.
I actually agree with you and in a way hawks point which ironically is that players improve with age notwithstanding he thought we’d be better with a younger back court. Simpson has the potential to get better. If you can shoot a high percentage from the line you have a chance to be a good shooter from the floor. He needs to get stronger and improve his shot selection. He hustles. He’s rebounding now. Seems like a good kid. I hope he hits the weights and dedicates himself. With him gg and jmike I really believe you have some pieces. Not the pieces mind you but a start.Simpson still the best foul shooter on the team.
Still quickest player on the team
And after Cliff, the best defensive player on the team.
Despite horrific shooting, he almost had a double double yesterday.
Despite a bad game shooting he lead the team in rebounds!!! 8!!! And tied for the lead in assists.
He still won the Stonehill game, half court shot at Indiana and foul shots won the game.
Dominated the OSU game and almost had a triple double against Nebraska.
He won the PSU and Indiana game last year.
Yep he needs to get stronger and make more shots but he’s still only a sophomore.
Fan base ridiculously hard on him and news flash JMike isn’t a point guard.
The problem is he can improve and go from very very bad to just bad... and that's still bad. The odds of someone being extremely inefficient year 1, all time bad year 2, then becoming a plus good efficient offensive player have to be soooo extremely rareI actually agree with you and in a way hawks point which ironically is that players improve with age notwithstanding he thought we’d be better with a younger back court. Simpson has the potential to get better. If you can shoot a high percentage from the line you have a chance to be a good shooter from the floor. He needs to get stronger and improve his shot selection. He hustles. He’s rebounding now. Seems like a good kid. I hope he hits the weights and dedicates himself. With him gg and jmike I really believe you have some pieces. Not the pieces mind you but a start.
Don’t kill my buzz dude.The problem is he can improve and go from very very bad to just bad... and that's still bad. The odds of someone being extremely inefficient year 1, all time bad year 2, then becoming a plus good efficient offensive player have to be soooo extremely rare
His hustle is clearly there and the effort for rebounds is nice to see, but you just can't be this inefficient offensively
I think he can get better. Will he? I admit it’s not a given. I’m hoping better pieces around him will help him settle in and define a better role for himself.The problem is he can improve and go from very very bad to just bad... and that's still bad. The odds of someone being extremely inefficient year 1, all time bad year 2, then becoming a plus good efficient offensive player have to be soooo extremely rare
His hustle is clearly there and the effort for rebounds is nice to see, but you just can't be this inefficient offensively