I think most reasonable people figured we would be in the 5 to 7 win range by year 4. That is where we are. The problem is year 3 was a disaster and we need to stop the woodshed losses .Generally, I would not root against Hafley per se. Or Mike Houston. Or Leipold. Or any number of other names that the “anyone but Schiano” clan on here have thrown out to nauseum until that coach’s team implodes and then that poster either shuts up (or more often) throws out another name. You didn’t do that to your credit and while Schiano was not your first choice - I don’t see it as you continuing to suggest how a bunch of other guys would’ve been so much better for us. I will root for Hafley to do great at his next stop as DC.
The bottom line is if you put all these damn names that have been thrown out in a hat and pick one at random odds were always much more likely that we’d end up not improving our situation at all (and what Ash left behind was pretty awful) than finding that perfect diamond in a rough coach. We brought in the guy that few questioned would at least be able to turn the defense around. You’ve basically said as much and haven’t really been a part of the group continuing to push the issue for years on in even though this thread tends to get tangled in it.