ADVERTISEMENT

Hats off to Hafley

Generally, I would not root against Hafley per se. Or Mike Houston. Or Leipold. Or any number of other names that the “anyone but Schiano” clan on here have thrown out to nauseum until that coach’s team implodes and then that poster either shuts up (or more often) throws out another name. You didn’t do that to your credit and while Schiano was not your first choice - I don’t see it as you continuing to suggest how a bunch of other guys would’ve been so much better for us. I will root for Hafley to do great at his next stop as DC.

The bottom line is if you put all these damn names that have been thrown out in a hat and pick one at random odds were always much more likely that we’d end up not improving our situation at all (and what Ash left behind was pretty awful) than finding that perfect diamond in a rough coach. We brought in the guy that few questioned would at least be able to turn the defense around. You’ve basically said as much and haven’t really been a part of the group continuing to push the issue for years on in even though this thread tends to get tangled in it.
I think most reasonable people figured we would be in the 5 to 7 win range by year 4. That is where we are. The problem is year 3 was a disaster and we need to stop the woodshed losses .
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17
The job was just too big for him. I’m not sure if it was the timing , lack of resources and support or a combination thereof. I think he would’ve had success at a smaller school / scale. He was a good game day coach. Did well on Schiano’s staff first round. But he also made a lot of mistakes at Rutgers. He’s certainly not a hall of famer. He just doesn’t belong in the same category of awful that I reserve for guys like Ash who did nothing right ever for RU.
No he was awful. The way he blew the 2012 team talent is unforgivable. Kent state , louisville, Pitt, and he was in a dogfight with one of the worst army teams of all time.
2013 was a disaster
2014 - solid
2015 - disaster
And his recruiting stunk
 
I think Leipold was pretty high up there.

Every great coach has a tree of great coaches that prosper from them. It would be good for GS if some of his coaches went on to great success.

No not at the beginning. Hafley was first. It wasn’t just you. That’s who the angry “we hate Schiano” crew wanted

Leipold, remember, was having a mediocre season at Buffalo in 2019. He finished 7-5 in the MAC that year. Our fan base would have been furious if that was what we brought in at the time. Remember that Covid made us forget the variable of butts in the seat in 2020 but one major embarrassing issue we had was an empty stadium in 2019 because Ash had ruined us. We were not going to bring in a coach with no ties to NJ coming off that kind of season in the MAC. We needed to generate some hype.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GillesDeleuze
Let's be honest. All of these people are the tallest midgets. Any real program changer isn't coming from this pool of the candidates.

It's an argument over mediocrity at best.
 
Let's be honest. All of these people are the tallest midgets. Any real program changer isn't coming from this pool of the candidates.

It's an argument over mediocrity at best.
Where rutgers missed the boat was 2013. Mullen and tressel were available. Julie takes the fall for that and not getting it done , and it eventually got her fired. But supposedly lots of loser BOG and donors would rather have celebrated the win over usf to get to 6-6
 
I think most reasonable people figured we would be in the 5 to 7 win range by year 4. That is where we are. The problem is year 3 was a disaster and we need to stop the woodshed losses .

Actually, I think what most people figured was he would at least make us into what would’ve been a perennial lower tier 7-8ish win bowl team in the old Big East relatively quickly and in fairness, that’s also probably about where we are at. We just play a tougher schedule now and unfortunately a 7-8 win team playing that schedule might only win 4-5 with our current schedule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95
Where rutgers missed the boat was 2013. Mullen and tressel were available. Julie takes the fall for that and not getting it done , and it eventually got her fired. But supposedly lots of loser BOG and donors would rather have celebrated the win over usf to get to 6-6

That may be the one thing I don't point at Julie. Signing those two would have required more money she ever had to work with
 
Where rutgers missed the boat was 2013. Mullen and tressel were available. Julie takes the fall for that and not getting it done , and it eventually got her fired. But supposedly lots of loser BOG and donors would rather have celebrated the win over usf to get to 6-6

Hermann was one of the top 3 worst things to happen to Rutgers. She was in no way qualified for the position she found herself in and was there for one reason. No need to rehash the obvious. It's a typical result of what happens when someone isn't hired on merit and accomplishment.
 
Actually, I think what most people figured was he would at least make us into what would’ve been a perennial lower tier 7-8ish win bowl team in the old Big East relatively quickly and in fairness, that’s also probably about where we are at. We just play a tougher schedule now and unfortunately a 7-8 win team playing that schedule might only win 4-5 with our current schedule.
Yeah but he gets paid to compete in the BIG
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95
I think most reasonable people figured we would be in the 5 to 7 win range by year 4. That is where we are. The problem is year 3 was a disaster and we need to stop the woodshed losses .
I said this before but I believe that this year will be what last year was supposed to be before all the injuries and the total incompetence on the offensive side of the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: czxqa
Hermann was one of the top 3 worst things to happen to Rutgers. She was in no way qualified for the position she found herself in and was there for one reason. No need to rehash the obvious. It's a typical result of what happens when someone isn't hired on merit and accomplishment.
Ehh . If she got the authority to hire tressel she would have had a nice career here. She was tied to and fired with flood, although she didn’t hire him
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17
I said this before but I believe that this year will be what last year was supposed to be before all the injuries and the total incompetence on the offensive side of the ball.
What does that get us ? 1 more win? 2 more points against a team like nebraska ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17
Let's be honest. All of these people are the tallest midgets. Any real program changer isn't coming from this pool of the candidates.

It's an argument over mediocrity at best.

it’s fine to call it that except the other candidates in the pool were far from guarantees to even elevate us to mediocre. We could not have afforded to continue along the 1 win season path for another 2-3 years. We’d be in serious danger of getting pushed out of the conference. The 78-0 eye poppers putting us on the news of steak restaurants had to stop at all costs. And routine losses to Eastern Michigan types. Top priority was to restore us to respectability. That happened fast. It’s taking longer than we hoped to take the next step to be true bowl contender but that doesn’t mean that first step wasn’t important too. Nor should it be assumed that any coach would’ve fixed it. There are many guys we could’ve brought in and ended up not winning a single game in 2020.
 
It’s all conjecture. We know Leipold was high on Hobbs’ list. Mediocre right now seems like Everest these last few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95
It’s all conjecture. We know Leipold was high on Hobbs’ list. Mediocre right now seems like Everest these last few years.
I honestly think we just got very unlucky last season with injuries to key position players being counted on in training camp. The 2021 team would’ve been a 7 win team in the ACC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Virginiarufan
Probably still too early to call this one. Recruiting and W/L about the same to date. They do seem to be trending down and this is a bad loss. Us hard to tell, can't put too much stock in the nice win over NW, they are bad and provided no pressure on our qb and we needed some 4th down conversions to build the lead. Last year was not good. Our schedule has 5 Top 25 and 3 Top 10 teams, they only have #4 FSU, so we could be much better but not show a disparity in wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plum Street
Probably still too early to call this one. Recruiting and W/L about the same to date. They do seem to be trending down and this is a bad loss. Us hard to tell, can't put too much stock in the nice win over NW, they are bad and provided no pressure on our qb and we needed some 4th down conversions to build the lead. Last year was not good. Our schedule has 5 Top 25 and 3 Top 10 teams, they only have #4 FSU, so we could be much better but not show a disparity in wins.
gif.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: colbert17
Hermann was one of the top 3 worst things to happen to Rutgers. She was in no way qualified for the position she found herself in and was there for one reason. No need to rehash the obvious. It's a typical result of what happens when someone isn't hired on merit and accomplishment.
Very similar to Ash hire. Associated with a good program under a great AD/HC. RU went cheap and hoped they learned enough to make it work. But the lack of experience doomed they both.
 
Did he say that?
So now you can only discuss things that Schiano actually said. Find a direct quote by Schiano or it did not happen.. is that how it works?

Please.. he said the only reason he left was the conference situation and when we got the Big Ten invite he was happy for us but it hit him hard. So, yeah, teh conference situation was a big factor for GS and, yes, he did not specifically say.. afaik.. that it was affecting recruiting but I sure think it did and, again, IMHO, you have really do some mental gymnastics to avoid such a conclusion.
 
Probably still too early to call this one. Recruiting and W/L about the same to date. They do seem to be trending down and this is a bad loss. Us hard to tell, can't put too much stock in the nice win over NW, they are bad and provided no pressure on our qb and we needed some 4th down conversions to build the lead. Last year was not good. Our schedule has 5 Top 25 and 3 Top 10 teams, they only have #4 FSU, so we could be much better but not show a disparity in wins.

Yes that’s that point I’ve been trying to make.
 
So now you can only discuss things that Schiano actually said. Find a direct quote by Schiano or it did not happen.. is that how it works?

Please.. he said the only reason he left was the conference situation and when we got the Big Ten invite he was happy for us but it hit him hard. So, yeah, teh conference situation was a big factor for GS and, yes, he did not specifically say.. afaik.. that it was affecting recruiting but I sure think it did and, again, IMHO, you have really do some mental gymnastics to avoid such a conclusion.

Perhaps he was thinking it would impact recruiting in the future? Regardless - inability to recruit due to the conference situation is not at all an excuse for why BC is losing on the current ACC and against bad non conference teams.
 
Perhaps he was thinking it would impact recruiting in the future? Regardless - inability to recruit due to the conference situation is not at all an excuse for why BC is losing on the current ACC and against bad non conference teams.
It would hurt the lesser teams before the better teams... at least to what degree it would hurt them. Name ACC teams would still get hurt a little.. but they have a reserve of recruits who grew up rooting for them. BC.. not so much. Now.. your argument is sound BC vs, say, Pitt, GTech, NC State.

Also, I am not saying it is the only reason Hafley is failing. Just saying it could be contributing. I suppose I might be suggesting that BC is just screwed. Maybe they need lightning in a bottle.. like a Deion Sanders hire.. to make a significant difference. but look at what Deion did right away.. get out of the dying PAC.. do you think that happens without his blessing, or conversely, do you think Deion says yes to Colorado if they stayed in the PAC? (Dec 22 they hire Deion, June 23 announce leaving PAC)
 
So now you can only discuss things that Schiano actually said. Find a direct quote by Schiano or it did not happen.. is that how it works?

Please.. he said the only reason he left was the conference situation and when we got the Big Ten invite he was happy for us but it hit him hard. So, yeah, teh conference situation was a big factor for GS and, yes, he did not specifically say.. afaik.. that it was affecting recruiting but I sure think it did and, again, IMHO, you have really do some mental gymnastics to avoid such a conclusion.
The thing was he was recruiting well .
 
Agreed. Why wouldn’t we root for Flood? He was a guy who got in over his head but he gave his all to Rutgers when he was here. He wasn’t all bad as a HC - as he still owns the 8-5 inaugural season in the BIG on his resume.
That was his problem, he didn't give his all. The stories of his laziness are legendary. County Crows concert for example. He also was way too lax with the players and it set us back years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Virginiarufan
I've never heard that. He went to a concert? That's an issue?
Counting Crows was a huge scandal. IIRC, someone from the press asked him how the Counting Crows concert was after a press conference.



Counting Crows lead singer Adam Duritz, pictured here cheering on his alma mater during a Cal women's basketball game versus Rutgers at the RAC on Dec. 10, 2007, gave Rutgers football coach Kyle Flood a "shout out'' at a concert. (The Star-Ledger file photo by John Munson | NJ Advance Media)


 
Counting crows wasn’t a huge scandal. He blew off an unofficial visitor for the concert. That’s not a scandal. That’s a recruiting faux pas.
 
Hermann was one of the top 3 worst things to happen to Rutgers. She was in no way qualified for the position she found herself in and was there for one reason. No need to rehash the obvious. It's a typical result of what happens when someone isn't hired on merit and accomplishment.
She was bad no doubt. If she got rid of flood in 2013 and hired Mullen, petrino or tressel the narrative on her changes
 
  • Like
Reactions: MADHAT1
Hermann was one of the top 3 worst things to happen to Rutgers. She was in no way qualified for the position she found herself in and was there for one reason. No need to rehash the obvious. It's a typical result of what happens when someone isn't hired on merit and accomplishment.
bingo
 
She was bad no doubt. If she got rid of flood in 2013 and hired Mullen, petrino or tressel the narrative on her changes

She was bad, but that was an impossibility. Not enough money. I wonder if at least part of the reason she was hired was because she accepted the funding limitations. Also checked the right boxes
 
I think most reasonable people figured we would be in the 5 to 7 win range by year 4. That is where we are. The problem is year 3 was a disaster and we need to stop the woodshed losses .
that is not where we are

we'll be luck to get 4 never mind more than that this year
 
Schiano needs more than 4 wins to have any reasonable claim that he's the right guy for this position at this time.
 
Probably still too early to call this one. Recruiting and W/L about the same to date. They do seem to be trending down and this is a bad loss. Us hard to tell, can't put too much stock in the nice win over NW, they are bad and provided no pressure on our qb and we needed some 4th down conversions to build the lead. Last year was not good. Our schedule has 5 Top 25 and 3 Top 10 teams, they only have #4 FSU, so we could be much better but not show a disparity in wins.
you're right, too bad small minds can't think outside the blinders

spot on post actually
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT