126 people donated between $ 5-6k and that's a sign of overall support for firing Flood?...$ 46.71 per person...it is exactly why we never have succeeded...small time fans donating smaller time money...get a life already...
Yes beg.
Just wait if they keep Flood. Which is the only way I'd go anywhere, and thousands will with me. Let them beg then.
I am not letting this admin and Flood take down my alma mater because they are a bunch of penny pinching braindead weasels.
We won't go down without a fight. We are the majority, and this admin will have to respect that or move along.
The overwhelming majority of fans know he should rightfully be dismissed. Get that through your thick skull, man who has a life.126 people donated between $ 5-6k and that's a sign of overall support for firing Flood?...$ 46.71 per person...it is exactly why we never have succeeded...small time fans donating smaller time money...get a life already...
The University has to be loyal to its employees no matter what it thinks of their performance. It's not going to say now that it will "evaluate;" that is the kiss of death, and no self-respecting coach is going to want to come to a school that undercuts a coach that way. Sorry, but I think NIRH is off-base on this one.
The Local Shill...another tough guy who can't read or interpret what I wrote... nobody said he's not deserving of being fired... you have only a small group who actually donate significant monies yearly to Rutgers football and the proof is in the amount pledged by April 30th each year...Do you know the yearly average amount which is donated by season ticket holders?...it is a total of less than $ 1000.00 ... and for the record Shill...the people who will make the final decisions aren't the fans ...especially at Rutgers....that is why Flood just may be back in 2016...the only way he doesn't stay is if we lose the next 3 games and that is a possibility...The overwhelming majority of fans know he should rightfully be dismissed. Get that through your thick skull, man who has a life.
Not really. $10K (and growing) gets some donor attention from the powers that be at Rutgers. It isn't insignificant, especially when you consider the attention it is getting.
Are people really saying fire him today or simply fire him when the season ends? When you have the coach making statements like he has, not to mention the administration laughing off a grassroots fundraising, it isn't a wonder the fans are a little on edge.
As leaders, you don't essentially belittle your customers when they feel this way. But hey, this is Rutgers. They do things different.
Yes, it happens in *December.* It doesn't happen in mid-season in the form of statements that undercut the coach.
No offense, but weren't you saying that the university should do exactly this with Towers, simply because you don't agree with him? Can't have it both ways.
I hear you Not, but I don't agree that it's not about money. Everything about RU is about money (the lack of it) and the creation of the Gofundme thing shows how we all recognize that. Flood has to go, but this pathetic piker approach to doing it, that had absolutely no chance to succeed because no major donors would ever give a meaningful gift though such an amateurish vehicle, isn't the way to go. This is something you might see from a community college or an NAIA Division II school, but it's not something that puts a B1G university with great aspirations in a very flattering light.
Towers is not an alum. He is concerned with only Flood, not RU. The donation is about RU, HC aside. Big difference.
This. It is not rocket science.
You support the coach until he is no longer the coach.
And by "support the coach" you mean what exactly? Keep your mouth quiet about your dissatisfaction even when a major sports publication is writing an article putting him as a top ten coach who should be on the hot seat?
What would talking about your dissatisfaction accomplish?
Whether he is an alum is completely inconsequential. Alabama wouldn't be Alabama if only alums donated. You need far more than alums only.
LOL, the University's response was THE COMPLETE OPPOSITE OF WHAT TO DO!
They took a tiny campaign that was reported on a few websites and helped make it a major story -- all within 24 hours. If you think this is the proper way to handle this you should reach a book on PR crisis management. (btw, this wasn't a crisis situation, but they turned it into one)