Hopefully. The whole "hostess" thing has always been sketchy.
If it makes any difference, Doreen Buttery Ash was in charge of the "hostess" program at tOSU.
So you don't think Ash has plans to drop the hostesses?
Don't want any part of it. Let paid fully clothed adults do the job of showing the campus.
If you think placing attractive people in marketing/sales roles is not common then boy do I have a bridge to sell you.
If you think placing attractive people in marketing/sales roles is not common then boy do I have a bridge to sell you.
So you knew it was a hostess because she was doing a lap dance?May be mistaken, but I thought I saw what appeared to be hostesses where the recruits were seated at the home game.
I love the animosity toward the hostesses here. Just another example of Rutgers raising the bar on itself to make it even harder to succeed than it already is. Just stop with the holier than thou fantasyland nonsense. There is nothing wrong with some girls showing athletes around the campus during a visit and everyone else does it.
Lets have some success first, then start trying to make it harder on ourselves.
In what way is the concept of Recruiting Hookers "sketchy"?
Hopefully. The whole "hostess" thing has always been sketchy.
Gee, shocker of a response right here!
its used in every big program..no need to act like we are in the Mac..keep the program.Oh good, Nuts is here to share his unique brand of stultifying dross. I can't wait.
Oh good, Nuts is here to share his unique brand of stultifying dross. I can't wait.
Hopefully. The whole "hostess" thing has always been sketchy.
It's not that sketchy. It seems pretty clearly drawn. :)Hopefully. The whole "hostess" thing has always been sketchy.
My understanding is that hostesses are volunteers. If they are actually making a difference in recruiting then they are adding value to the program. They should be compensated and in that compensation their duties would be strictly defined to be lawful. If this happened, which would protect the hostesses and the university there wouldn't be the issues with other schools like Tennessee. But then again if the duties of the hostesses were to be lawful the perceived value of the hostess program would be diminished as well.
I have no idea what you are talking about. Of course their duties, whether as volunteer or not, are strictly defined to be lawful. Do you actually think we are sending out these girls as volunterrs with the understanding that they provide sex to high school students? Really?? Doing that would be wildly illegal, and I have no idea why you think paying them would change anything.
If you perceive the program to be unlawful, you are letting your own fantasies supplant reality.
I don't know why people can't get it through their heads...maybe its just a middle aged fantasy thing. Repeat after me.... The Hostesses are not prostitutes, they are tour guides. The hostesses are not part of a statutory rape program.
Onesimus - please submit a pic to the board to see if you are attractive enough to sell me a bridge.If you think placing attractive people in marketing/sales roles is not common then boy do I have a bridge to sell you.
Jesus! Jesus!I have no idea what you are talking about. Of course their duties, whether as volunteer or not, are strictly defined to be lawful. Do you actually think we are sending out these girls as volunterrs with the understanding that they provide sex to high school students? Really?? Doing that would be wildly illegal, and I have no idea why you think paying them would change anything.
If you perceive the program to be unlawful, you are letting your own fantasies supplant reality.
I don't know why people can't get it through their heads...maybe its just a middle aged fantasy thing. Repeat after me.... The Hostesses are not prostitutes, they are tour guides. The hostesses are not part of a statutory rape program.
Hit the thesaurus for that drivel?
Gee, shocker of a response right here!
I have no idea what you are talking about. Of course their duties, whether as volunteer or not, are strictly defined to be lawful. Do you actually think we are sending out these girls as volunterrs with the understanding that they provide sex to high school students? Really?? Doing that would be wildly illegal, and I have no idea why you think paying them would change anything.
If you perceive the program to be unlawful, you are letting your own fantasies supplant reality.
I don't know why people can't get it through their heads...maybe its just a middle aged fantasy thing. Repeat after me.... The Hostesses are not prostitutes, they are tour guides. The hostesses are not part of a statutory rape program.
Levo would be more than excited if a RU had twinkie dudes showing the footballers around. He would consider that progressive.
You're out of your league, Nuts. I'll come to you when I need advice on how to be a middle aged frat boy.