I know nobody reads NJ.com, they are complaining, no leaks,lol

[ruready4somefootball]

They don't know what they had, until it was gone,lol. In Hobbs we trust.:cop:

 

[knight82]

If he's shutting out the Star Liar, Hobbs has already won me over!

 

[RedSpartan]

In a word: good.

 

[Rutgers1976]

You say that as if it is a bad thing. :joy:

 

[Proud NJ Sports Fan]

Let that rag be the last to know.

 

[Ole Cabbagehead]

I refuse to go to their website, but someone just told me they already have the hit piece out on how much we are paying the search firm. F them.

No information, so they just go right to bashing.

 

[Rutgers1976]

I refuse to go to their website, but someone just told me they already have the hit piece out on how much we are paying the search firm. F them.

No information, so they just go right to bashing.

I'm also sure they have at the ready the articles trashing the new coach, whoever it is.

 

[RUsojo]

I refuse to go to their website, but someone just told me they already have the hit piece out on how much we are paying the search firm. F them.

No information, so they just go right to bashing.

I saw that too. Again, the title is so misleading. The article itself says they saved money on not hiring a search firm for the AD and this new firm is very reputable and they are only paying 70K plus expenses which seems like it will be less than last search. Yet the title is "see how much Rutgers is paying to find a new coach".

Makes no sense.

 

[Proud NJ Sports Fan]

It's a rag run by editors who do not have sound minds: Vezza & Moran the moron

 

[RUMBA-JK]

JH caught holly hell for saying they needed stories about troubles to stay alive & saying she hoped not to provide them ... and NJ.com distorted it into "JH wants NJ.com to die"

Hobbs said nothing & simply totally crushed their feeding tube

 

[MozRU]

Give them nothing.

 

[tico brown]

Good. Maybe the leaks were plugged early Sunday morning

 

[RUfromSoCal?]

I've been totally LOL'd to hear sliar has been 100% wrong on everything.

 

[derleider]

I saw that too. Again, the title is so misleading. The article itself says they saved money on not hiring a search firm for the AD and this new firm is very reputable and they are only paying 70K plus expenses which seems like it will be less than last search. Yet the title is "see how much Rutgers is paying to find a new coach".

Makes no sense.

Headliner writers are trying to get people to click. Rutgers saves money on search firm isn't an eye grabber.