ADVERTISEMENT

If Pikiell gets fired, Schiano should go with him

He’s not NBA ready either. Not even close. 6’9” 200 lbs soaking wet with no left hand is not NBA ready.

He’ll go high for potential alone and won’t have an impact for 2 years at least.
I think he would look more NBA ready surrounded by more talent or in a coherent offensive system.
 
Disclaimer: I do not want Schiano or Pikiell fired. This thread is in response to the many jackasses currently calling for Pikiell to be dismissed.

Steve Pikiell is the only coach to take Rutgers men's basketball to the NCAA Tournament in the past 30 years, and he did it twice. Actually three times since the 2020 tournament was cancelled due to COVID. RU was 100% in the field that year.

By comparison, Rutgers football has never played in a notable bowl let alone for a national championship under Greg Schiano's watch. Every bowl we've played in has been lower tier and there have been several disappointing seasons including the current one. So, if Steve Pikiell gets fired, Greg Schiano absolutely must go with him. Pikiell has accomplished far more in terms of wins and losses at RU than Schiano and it's really not even close.

Again, I don't want either coach fired. I just hope those of you calling for this to happen to Pikiell realize how ridiculous you sound. Go RU!
If 40% of Schianos starters were first round picks and he finished 5-7 (equivalent of not dancing) then yes, folks would be rightfully calling for his job.

Bball and football are also totally different sports so youll see far more upsets in bball. Every tourney we see a 13 or 14 seed upset a 3 or 4 seed.

Heres an example, oakland as a 14 seed beat kentucky as a 3 seed last year. Oakland was ranked 138 in kenpom and kentucky was ranked 17 going into that game. That would be the equivalent according to espn fpi rankings this season in football of LSU #17 losing to an FCS school considering there are only 134 fbs teams. If we wanna use the #134 FBS team it’d be 0-12 kent state. Those things dont happen in football.
 
If 16 percent of the football team's roster were first round picks and we lost to an Ivy league school I would agree with you.

Even a better percent would be 40% of the starters being first round draft picks. That is what Pike has. 40% of a football team's starters is 10 players. 16 Percent of the football team is 17 players.

If schiano had 17 first or second round draft picks and had the season he had he should be on the hot seat.
You mean like the Ohio St defense, that Greg was in charge of? He got fish fried, and ran out of town. They were stacked, and he was still cooked up. That's why he crawled back to Rutgers.. No onw else wanted him. Pike phone would ring off the hook - if him and Rutgers parted ways
 
You mean like the Ohio St defense, that Greg was in charge of? He got fish fried, and ran out of town. They were stacked, and he was still cooked up. That's why he crawled back to Rutgers.. No onw else wanted him. Pike phone would ring off the hook - if him and Rutgers parted ways
who would be calling him? bucknell and fairfield?
 
Do you really believe this?? What you are stating is that Schiano could buy better players with more money and his teams would improve....

I find that hard to believe even Pre-NIL when we had a team full of NFL players in 2007 and failed to make a NYE bowl game. He had the likes of Huggins and Hamilton committing here and how did that all pan out?

I really do like Schiano and what he has done for this program/school in terms of being the CEO of our Football Program. His gameday coaching is questionable. Similar to Pike we feel like we can compete in any game. I have just seen coaches do more with less "star" players. Thing is our fans are jaded because any bit of success gets clouded by our poor history.
Huggins and Hamilton were recruited by Schiano but played under Flood.
 
Yeah, I said lower levels for the most part. Greg's had some P5 success, so has Pike, Young from Texas, Hyatt from LSU, ect. Their strategies, and probably success rates, are similar, my only point there.

With Strong, I'm just saying Pike isn't going to get a chance to develop an Ace whereas Greg knows he gets time w his freshman, he can slow play development a bit. Pike cant. 5 star freshman are still just freshman, and I thought there was little chance both our kids would be college superstars year 1. Ace's high ranking was always based on the future and his potential. Tried saying he may have trouble adapting to structure and team game. Even with that, he's still been an above average scorer, and has improved his rebounding and D a bit.

I don't think either guy should be on a hot seat. Pike has done a bad job building this year's team, hopefully he learns from it.
Pikiell didn't do a great job last year either. Sure Cam and Paul left but part of Pikiell's job was to keep close tabs on his best players. When they left the people he brought over were subpar (Fernandez) and he didn't develop the roster folks effectively (Simpson, Wolfolk, Chol). He did a fine job of playing them up just like he did Souf Mensah.
 
So we should settle for .500 season in football just to make a bowl game?

So we should settle for NCAA invites being on the bubble on those two occasions(one of which was a play in game to get in the tournament and we lost).

the settling on the mediocrity above is typical of our RU fanbase. We are good with settling and have mid level success of ANY kind.
Schiano has been the one touting for national championships and raised those expectations himself. Is he wrong in having those aspirations? I think any coach wants to go out there and win every game. We as fans don’t coach or play in those games and we should be striving for the same.
Yes we should settle for mediocrity at this point
 
He’s not NBA ready either. Not even close. 6’9” 200 lbs soaking wet with no left hand is not NBA ready.

He’ll go high for potential alone and won’t have an impact for 2 years at least.
Agree with you. He’ll go in the lottery but won’t have an impact for a while. Lots of potential but nowhere near ready.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BossNJ
I think that is a freshman thing......

Some are killing Pike for not "running an offense". More than 55% of our usage is Dylan and Ace....I get the sense Ace is learning how to play in a structured offense. I think Dylan is more used to it as he was coached better in HS and had to do things off the ball as he wasn't the point guard.
Where is this second team Ace plays on ? Is that even allowed ? The Rutgers team sure as hell isn’t a structured offense. He’s not learning anything. It’s streetball. If you took the same starters off the street and they never played together before this is what you’d see.

Last year was no different. Williams, JaMiss and DSelfish. Holy Mother of God was there a less structured and less team oriented backcourt in the country ? No. Once Spencer left the year before it turned into shot hunting free-for-all. Only Noah had any interest in passing, sometimes.
 
Last edited:
I think he would look more NBA ready surrounded by more talent or in a coherent offensive system.
Ace isn't really even good now at the college level. He shows instances of brilliance, but his game is raw and he is woefully underdeveloped in every aspect. It's all just freaky raw skills that outshine the flaws at times. He will get drafted high because of the talent and I hope he eventually crushes it. We will just never really experience it here.
 
Ace isn't really even good now at the college level. He shows instances of brilliance, but his game is raw and he is woefully underdeveloped in every aspect. It's all just freaky raw skills that outshine the flaws at times. He will get drafted high because of the talent and I hope he eventually crushes it. We will just never really experience it here.
Our offensive system or really lack thereof does him zero favors.
 
Disclaimer: I do not want Schiano or Pikiell fired. This thread is in response to the many jackasses currently calling for Pikiell to be dismissed.

Steve Pikiell is the only coach to take Rutgers men's basketball to the NCAA Tournament in the past 30 years, and he did it twice. Actually three times since the 2020 tournament was cancelled due to COVID. RU was 100% in the field that year.

By comparison, Rutgers football has never played in a notable bowl let alone for a national championship under Greg Schiano's watch. Every bowl we've played in has been lower tier and there have been several disappointing seasons including the current one. So, if Steve Pikiell gets fired, Greg Schiano absolutely must go with him. Pikiell has accomplished far more in terms of wins and losses at RU than Schiano and it's really not even close.

Again, I don't want either coach fired. I just hope those of you calling for this to happen to Pikiell realize how ridiculous you sound. Go RU!
giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Our offensive system or really lack thereof does him zero favors.
Dylan can overcome it because he can create his own shot and is constantly playing downhill. Ace has some shooting ability but settles for off balance mid range jumpers too often. Agree he would benefit with actual plays run to set him up. Otherwise he should just learn to drive the hoop every play
 
  • Like
Reactions: rume
If 40% of Schianos starters were first round picks and he finished 5-7 (equivalent of not dancing) then yes, folks would be rightfully calling for his job.

Bball and football are also totally different sports so youll see far more upsets in bball. Every tourney we see a 13 or 14 seed upset a 3 or 4 seed.

Heres an example, oakland as a 14 seed beat kentucky as a 3 seed last year. Oakland was ranked 138 in kenpom and kentucky was ranked 17 going into that game. That would be the equivalent according to espn fpi rankings this season in football of LSU #17 losing to an FCS school considering there are only 134 fbs teams. If we wanna use the #134 FBS team it’d be 0-12 kent state. Those things dont happen in football.

This would mean that 6-6 in football is the same as dancing in basketball. Or that making a bowl game is equivalent to making the tournament. Neither of these are reality,

For example, you can get to 6-6 in football by beating 3 pasties in September and then going 3-6 in conference the rest of the season.

That math doesn’t work in basketball. If you win 1/3rd of your conference games you have no shot at making the tournament.

Making a bowl game is definitely easier than making the tournament.
 
This would mean that 6-6 in football is the same as dancing in basketball. Or that making a bowl game is equivalent to making the tournament. Neither of these are reality,

For example, you can get to 6-6 in football by beating 3 pasties in September and then going 3-6 in conference the rest of the season.

That math doesn’t work in basketball. If you win 1/3rd of your conference games you have no shot at making the tournament.

Making a bowl game is definitely easier than making the tournament.
Is it though? For example the last season we made the tourney in 2022 9 teams in the B1G danced. Likewise 9 teams bowled.

Bowling is probably a tad easier. So making the tourney is more like a 6-6 big ten team with a solid out of conference win or a 7-5 big ten team beating 3 MAC schools out of conference. B1G football is significantly better than B1G bball too. B1G bball is kinda ass
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38
Ace’s offensive efficiency numbers are poor because we do nothing on offense to create open looks forcing him and Dylan to do everything. Almost all of his shots come from iso ball. If you think Ace is even remotely close to one of our biggest problems, then I don’t know what else to tell you.

Fig will never see it any other way. He didn’t like having ace and Dylan here from the start (inexplicably) thus…

All of his arguments will be to support his initial view .

Just watch
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38
Why drag a different program into the conversation about the basketball program?

What a way to distract people. Was the original post created by Pike's agent?

Does RU fire anyone that has a buyout of more than 17 cents?
 
Please show me the two top 5-10 picks on the football roster. I’ll wait. I cannot emphasize this enough. Having Dylan Harper and Ace Bailey is a once in a lifetime situation and you’re gonna compare the job GS has done to what Pike is currently doing?
I loved Pike early on. Very impressive he got us out of the gutter, but what we’re watching is a joke.
While Pike has recruited several great players, it really doesn't mean anything unless you win. I would argue GS has his program on more of an upward trajectory. My only knock on him is the way he left the first time. IMO he's more of a teacher, leader, and disciplinarian - maybe Pike more of a motivator. Given the choice I'll take the former.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biazza38
Greg has always been subpar. Pike on the other hand, just simply got crushed by the NIL era. Schiano showed how underwhelming he
is, with a star studded Ohio St defense. Ohio st couldn't wait to get rid of him.

Pike for all his flaws, give him the keys to Kansas roster, I doubt he'd be the failure, the Schiano was at Ohio st
Give Pike the keys to the Kansas roster, UCLA, MSU, Duke, NC, and 50 other schools, and he would under perform relative to the coaches already there.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ancienthooper
Fair comparisons between Greg and Pike can be made with regard to game prep, gameday coaching, loyalty to (sometimes underperforming) players, and elevating their programs from the depths of despair.

Can’t fairly compare the two sports when it comes to recruiting, development, and post-season invites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bethlehemfan
agreed they are very different sports. Basketball it is easier to bring in 1-2 players and make an impactful difference.
Bailey is a top pick because of potential not production. An Ivy League football team is not beating Rutgers in football regardless of how many first round players Rutgers has on the football team. These kind of upsets call it a 15-1 even 12-5 seed upset happen all the time in basketball. They don’t happen in football which is the main reason it’s a stupid comparison. Finally in basketball the experience is hugely important. I remember Chris Mullins as freshman coming into the rac and getting beat. That was the last time they lost to Rutgers. Mullins said the next year “we were babies”. That’s what this team is and that’s why they aren’t closing these out right now. Pike will be in the hotseat next year if we are mediocre again. This year no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyC80 and gef21
Greg had the most disappointing season in 20 years this year.

Somehow, Pike might actually take that prize right from him
 
Bailey is a top pick because of potential not production. An Ivy League football team is not beating Rutgers in football regardless of how many first round players Rutgers has on the football team. These kind of upsets call it a 15-1 even 12-5 seed upset happen all the time in basketball. They don’t happen in football which is the main reason it’s a stupid comparison. Finally in basketball the experience is hugely important. I remember Chris Mullins as freshman coming into the rac and getting beat. That was the last time they lost to Rutgers. Mullins said the next year “we were babies”. That’s what this team is and that’s why they aren’t closing these out right now. Pike will be in the hotseat next year if we are mediocre again. This year no.
I love that we’ve hit the point of bashing Ace Bailey. His college comp is Jabari Smith. Here are both of their stats. Yes, Smith had less minutes per game and better TO numbers, but this idea of him not producing is starting to get funny. The difference is Smith played a good team with good players around him so every time he made a mistake he didn’t have fans saying ridiculous things such as him not being college ready like others have on this board

 
I love that we’ve hit the point of bashing Ace Bailey. His college comp is Jabari Smith. Here are both of their stats. Yes, Smith had less minutes per game and better TO numbers, but this idea of him not producing is starting to get funny. The difference is Smith played a good team with good players around him so every time he made a mistake he didn’t have fans saying ridiculous things such as him not being college ready like others have on this board

I have zero idea what people actually expected out of Ace. He's been around what we should have desired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedTeam1994
Greg had the most disappointing season in 20 years this year.

Somehow, Pike might actually take that prize right from him

What?

Randal you just proved you’re not paying attention.

Considering all of the injuries Greg actually managed to pull out a decent season

it was actually somewhat impressive how they managed to salvage the season after the mid-season swoon

Granted no one on the football board is waving their Pom poms but those actually paying attention on the football side realize that the coaches did a pretty decent job pulling this team together

Again, reason to celebrate? No

But “most disappointing in 20 years”? Nah

If it was truly the “most disappointing seasons in 20 years” there would be a chorus of people on the football board calling for Greg’s head. But you don’t. Why? Again, considering the injuries, he actually did a pretty good job this year.

So even his critics (and he probably has more than pike) aren’t calling for his head
 
Last edited:
I love that we’ve hit the point of bashing Ace Bailey. His college comp is Jabari Smith. Here are both of their stats. Yes, Smith had less minutes per game and better TO numbers, but this idea of him not producing is starting to get funny. The difference is Smith played a good team with good players around him so every time he made a mistake he didn’t have fans saying ridiculous things such as him not being college ready like others have on this board

I’m not bashing him.
 
Figured this would come up. Kn a couple other threads people were hinting at comparing HC Pike's accomplishments against HC Schiano.

The issue isn't comparing accomplishments (arguably HC Pike has more).

Currently football is at worst on a mediocre plateau. Is that plateau lower than it should be? Perhaps - that's up for debate. But we've made back to back bowls.
If we won 4 games this year then it would be a similar situation.

Basketball appears to be going backwards over the past 3-4 years.
That doesn't diminish or minimize earlier success or accomplishments.
But it's not really the same as footballs current state.
Football is not on a plateau. Schiano's 5 seasons are 3 5 4 7 and soon to be 8.
 
maybe some of that is on Ace....he doesn't work hard off the ball....the sets we have he doesnt make hard cuts...he jogs to where he needs to be

Normally I agree on your takes but I think you are way off base on Ace. Where to begin:

1) He’s playing 5-7 minutes a game out of position at the 5. That’s going to impact his efficiency numbers.

2) He’s making 45.8% of his shots and 33.3% of his 3s. Are you implying he should sit because of those numbers? How many times did Geo or Ron do better than that? I’ll wait. By Rutgers standards these are actually pretty good numbers. His FT shooting has been disappointing and brings down his overall efficiency but we’re not going to sit him because of this.

3) He didn’t even play against 2 of the cupcakes and is still averaging 17.6 ppg and 7.6 rpg. Even if you tried to argue that Dylan Grant or someone else might be better on D it seems a stretch to imagine him being better on the glass. And the offense would be night and day.
 
Normally I agree on your takes but I think you are way off base on Ace. Where to begin:

1) He’s playing 5-7 minutes a game out of position at the 5. That’s going to impact his efficiency numbers.

2) He’s making 45.8% of his shots and 33.3% of his 3s. Are you implying he should sit because of those numbers? How many times did Geo or Ron do better than that? I’ll wait. By Rutgers standards these are actually pretty good numbers. His FT shooting has been disappointing and brings down his overall efficiency but we’re not going to sit him because of this.

3) He didn’t even play against 2 of the cupcakes and is still averaging 17.6 ppg and 7.6 rpg. Even if you tried to argue that Dylan Grant or someone else might be better on D it seems a stretch to imagine him being better on the glass. And the offense would be night and day.
People are reaching with Ace right now and it’s comical how they’re just shrugging their shoulders at 17.6 ppg or the fact that he can take and make every show on the court despite being covered
 
Normally I agree on your takes but I think you are way off base on Ace. Where to begin:

1) He’s playing 5-7 minutes a game out of position at the 5. That’s going to impact his efficiency numbers.

2) He’s making 45.8% of his shots and 33.3% of his 3s. Are you implying he should sit because of those numbers? How many times did Geo or Ron do better than that? I’ll wait. By Rutgers standards these are actually pretty good numbers. His FT shooting has been disappointing and brings down his overall efficiency but we’re not going to sit him because of this.

3) He didn’t even play against 2 of the cupcakes and is still averaging 17.6 ppg and 7.6 rpg. Even if you tried to argue that Dylan Grant or someone else might be better on D it seems a stretch to imagine him being better on the glass. And the offense would be night and day.
#2 Ron had a higher efg his sophomore through senior seasons.
 
Very bad comparison.

Making the tourney is MUCH harder than making a low level bowl.

Just sayin
Yea was so easy to make a bowl over the last decade. Anyone with half a brain can see football recruiting and development are miles ahead of where basketball is right now
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT