ADVERTISEMENT

I'm Not Kidding, Eddie Jordan should be given a 3 year extension now...

Hey asshat, watch his tape. He is a silky smooth lefty can can shoot mid range and looked like he was unselfish and a better passer. He looks 6'5-6. I can hope he plays as good as CJ Fair. Hold this post in your archive and let's see how things pan out. I will be happy to discuss it after he is here a year or two. Will you?

that's a stretch, if he was CJ Fair there would be more offers. He is a flyer, a guy with potential. Saying he is CJ Fair is similar to talk that Nigel Johnson is like Magic. For years I have heard people talk about potential recruits and talk about their tapes and how good they looked and for years when they start playing its not as impressive as the tapes. You could be right but there is no reason to believe you are right either until it happens
 
Par for the course guys. Someone posted yesterday that Daily was going to be C.J. Fair. You can't have reasonable conversations with some people.

This feels like the Flood debate all over again. We didn't get prison-sexed on national TV by MSU, I see the Rose Bowl in our future. WTF.


this is true, I saw some of the same arguments being used for Flood..injuries decimating the secondary, you cant judge Russo, give Flood a chance, who are you going to get who is better, no one wants to come here. Thowing parades because they rally to beat mediocre schools...etc
 
Hey asshat, watch his tape. He is a silky smooth lefty can can shoot mid range and looked like he was unselfish and a better passer. He looks 6'5-6. I can hope he plays as good as CJ Fair. Hold this post in your archive and let's see how things pan out. I will be happy to discuss it after he is here a year or two. Will you?

You also said Freeman is going to be putting up 20 a game. You tend to be hyperbolic in your optimism.
 
.500 for some is too easy a goal to reach. Ohio has us winning 18 games and going to the Dance. We're going to go from 0 BIG wins to at least 7(incredibly conservative) because a handful of marginal recruits and two bigmen, who play like stiffs, return.


bottom line is we return Freeman which should help as will Johnson as another guard. Afterr that its a total crapshoot. Doorson and Diallo have not shown the ability to be legit big men..they could but they haven't so for right now the expectations are that will be our weak spot on the court and they will be there for rebounding and defense with very little offense running through them. I should say people should be worried about Foreman really not being up to starting standards...Illinois game prime example. Plus there will be a transfer or two...there always is. Plus you deal with players with injuries coming back not 100%. So what the so called positoids forget is all those things that could screw things up. They wont all happen but I guarantee you some of these bad things will derail this team in someway next year.

What about conditioning. This team has poor conditioning. The S&C is a pro guy not college...big difference...we have guys with pudge and no muscle. Foreman, Doorson, and Williams better cut the weight and cut their bodies up. Will the staff push them...will those players take upon themselves to do all they can to get better...are they willing? Freeman and Diallo need to put on more weight. Laurent really needs to hit the weights and food trough. These things matter

Furthermore no teams go from 0 wins to 7-8 wins. Just who are we beating. Are we beating any of the top 7 schools...NO....are you just expecting to win every single swing game against Nwsern, PSU, Minny, Illi, Nebby. Really? That's quite ambitious because those programs will also be getting better too.

I asked this before..whats the end game..what do you think will happen year 5, year 6..how many years are you giving Jordan...do you assume Sanders stays4 years...he could bolt after 3
 
Last edited:
bottom line is we return Freeman which should help as will Johnson as another guard. Afterr that its a total crapshoot. Doorson and Diallo have not shown the ability to be legit big men..they could but they haven't so for right now the expectations are that will be our weak spot on the court and they will be there for rebounding and defense with very little offense running through them. I should say people should be worried about Foreman really not being up to starting standards...Illinois game prime example. Plus there will be a transfer or two...there always is. Plus you deal with players with injuries coming back not 100%. So what the so called positoids forget is all those things that could screw things up. They wont all happen but I guarantee you some of these bad things will derail this team in someway next year.

What about conditioning. This team has poor conditioning. The S&C is a pro guy not college...big difference...we have guys with pudge and no muscle. Foreman, Doorson, and Williams better cut the weight and cut their bodies up. Will the staff push them...will those players take upon themselves to do all they can to get better...are they willing? Freeman and Diallo need to put on more weight. These things matter

Furthermore no teams go from 0 wins to 7-8 wins. Just who are we beating. Are we beating any of the top 7 schools...NO....are you just expecting to win every single swing game against Nwsern, PSU, Minny, Illi, Nebby. Really? That's quite ambitious because those programs will also be getting better too.

I asked this before..whats the end game..what do you think will happen year 5, year 6..how many years are you giving Jordan...do you assume Sanders stays4 years...he could bolt after 3

Yup, these delusional posters live in a vacuum. Sure,we might get better but so will other teams. RU better improve more than those teams improve or we won't make any climb in the standings.

A simple concept that often goes overlooked. Not that the 3 are anything that special, but three of the seven guys that actually play this year are gone next year. That's a lot of chemistry that has to develop. It's not a given that next year will be so much better.
 
good point. People are discounting the loss of Grier but he is scoring at a good clip and he is hitting 3s at a high percentage...is someone going to replace that. As bad as Daniels can be he can occasionally provide defense and some drives to the hoop. He does have his days. Lewis can hit that outside shot that neither of our bigs can hit. He is tough warrior with experience. So take those losses together you better make sure the others are making up for it. I would still say Lewis/Doorson is a wash. Freeman is in the lineup so that's a big upgrade as Foreman takes a seat. I think Laurent starts and hopefully he and Johnson can make up for the loss of Daniels and Grier's scoring. I see Williams on the bench as 6th man if Johnson is as good as he is being touted and if hes not better than Williams that people better pipe expectations down.
 
I would like to give EJ the opportunity to benefit from the ground-breaking of a practice facility. Personally, I think he has been recruiting pretty well, considering the results. I love the players he brought in this year (Freeman, Sanders, Laurent, Johnson). I like the first three for next year. I think people under estimate the impact of SOME institutional support for the program - on morale as well as recruiting. If - and I know it is a big if - but humor me.... if he keeps the team intact and Freeman gets a medical redshirt then we are looking a 2 full years with Sanders, Johnson and Freeman which in my opinion is a legit Big 10 core. And he will have some solid upperclassmen as role players (Williams, Laurent, Diallo, Doorson, Foreman). Add some recruits and I am optimistic enough to give him another year.
 
One has to feel badly for the fans who apparently do not appreciate the effort that our players gave last game and who think it is only about wins.

Our players were "men" the other might. I couldn't be prouder of them.

I love their fight. I am a big fan of Williams. NO one fights harder than he does. He is playing with a bad shooting hand and a bad leg. Anyone who doesn't appreciate these kinds of things is missing out on the true rewards of being a fan.

I give Coach Jordan all the credit in the world for the improvement we are seeing in the freshmen and the willingness of our players in a hopeless situation to fight with such determination.

I don't get into the arguments about whether he should stay or go. I only know that I am happy with the play of the team recently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ole Cabbagehead
No bac.. you can't compare 5 or 6 guys thrown off of Flood's team for misconduct to Eddie's running a clean program and having 1/4 of his team injured, including his best offensive player being injured for most of the year.

Flood had four years, Eddie should get four years. Flood was much better positioned for success at the start of his tenure than Eddie ever was.
 
Last edited:
I would like to give EJ the opportunity to benefit from the ground-breaking of a practice facility. Personally, I think he has been recruiting pretty well, considering the results. I love the players he brought in this year (Freeman, Sanders, Laurent, Johnson). I like the first three for next year. I think people under estimate the impact of SOME institutional support for the program - on morale as well as recruiting. If - and I know it is a big if - but humor me.... if he keeps the team intact and Freeman gets a medical redshirt then we are looking a 2 full years with Sanders, Johnson and Freeman which in my opinion is a legit Big 10 core. And he will have some solid upperclassmen as role players (Williams, Laurent, Diallo, Doorson, Foreman). Add some recruits and I am optimistic enough to give him another year.
Not saying I agree, but this is what a reasonable optimistic post looks like. No assumptions of other well-established programs imploding, or comparisons of unranked recruits to CJ Fair, etc.
 
No bac.. you can't compare 5 or 6 guys thrown off of Flood's team for misconduct to Eddie's running a clean program and having 1/4 of his team injured, including his best offensive player being injured for most of the year

Flood had four years, Eddie should get four years. Flood was much better positioned for success at the start of his tenure than Eddie ever was.


who said I was, I was comparing to performance
 
You were comparing the excuse making that fans are making for both coaches. It was almost universal on this board that Flood should go at the end of this year, not only because of poor performance but poor discipline and Flood breaking rules

No one is saying that they are thrilled with the performance of the basketball team the past three years, although in Eddie's first year they actually exceeded the pre-season predictions.
 
I would like to give EJ the opportunity to benefit from the ground-breaking of a practice facility. Personally, I think he has been recruiting pretty well, considering the results. I love the players he brought in this year (Freeman, Sanders, Laurent, Johnson). I like the first three for next year. I think people under estimate the impact of SOME institutional support for the program - on morale as well as recruiting. If - and I know it is a big if - but humor me.... if he keeps the team intact and Freeman gets a medical redshirt then we are looking a 2 full years with Sanders, Johnson and Freeman which in my opinion is a legit Big 10 core. And he will have some solid upperclassmen as role players (Williams, Laurent, Diallo, Doorson, Foreman). Add some recruits and I am optimistic enough to give him another year.
Ground breaking is at earliest 2017
 
Flood was handed a fairly good program, Jordan inherited a program in disarray.
Not saying Jordan should be back next year, but comparing him to Flood is not being fair.
Flood's 4-8 season was caused by poor coaching and players being thrown off the team under his watch.
Jordan had to fight an uphill battle because of the way the Rice fiasco made a bad program into a terrible one.
After Rice's first recruiting class, don't think he had a good one and that class really didn't pan out, except for Mack's heart.
All we heard was how they would be better next season ( until Rice was fired) and that really didn't happen .
Eddie has had a lot to overcome and some just dismiss that because they want him gone.
Won't say he deserves to stay , based on his record, but he deserves to have what he has to overcome part of anyone's opinion of whether he should have one more season or just be gone after this one.
 
I should say people should be worried about Foreman really not being up to starting standards...Illinois game prime example.

I wasn't able to see the game - what about Foreman's game against Illinois makes you worry about him not being able to get up to starting standards? It seems he didn't really see the floor much at all - just 17 minutes out of 55, and only 3 attempts (but 5 boards). Was he hurt? Or did EJ just bench him and not look back?
 
I'm convinced that there will always be a segment of the fan base that says Rutgers has talent even though the number of seasons without one NCAA bid will soon be approaching 26 years.The notion that there should be a three year contract extension for Jordan supports the conclusion that losing is acceptable and ridicule doesn't matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Local Shill
Terrible idea. We can get the same level of recruits that he has gotten this year even if potential recruits think he might be gone soon.
Really? Who is gonna bring in players better than Sanders, Laurent and Freeman under these conditions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: goru7
Really? Who is gonna bring in players better than Sanders, Laurent and Freeman under these conditions?

Check out the recruits coming in next year. I'd be surprised if our class is not dead last in the B1G.
 
this is true, I saw some of the same arguments being used for Flood..injuries decimating the secondary, you cant judge Russo, give Flood a chance, who are you going to get who is better, no one wants to come here. Thowing parades because they rally to beat mediocre schools...etc
Don't forget the most important issue that was preventing us from getting rid of Flood, money. There were posts that it was going to take over $5 million to fire the staff. Posts asking who would want to coach here, especially with an administration that refuses to invest in athletics and boosters who don't give back to the school.

You see the same posts now. How can we fire EJ, eat his contract, and pay another coach? We talked about this almost a month ago. People who know say that money isn't an issue. It turned out it wasn't for football and I have to believe the same is true in basketball.

Things have changed regarding the importance Rutgers places on athletics. I like everything I hear about Hobbs, he keeps pushing things forward. I expect he'll do the same with the men's basketball program. The women's program, I assume, will be a much tougher decision. I actually doubt he changes the football, men's bball, and women's bball coaches all in the same year.
 
Last edited:
Ground breaking is at earliest 2017
Nice post EJ, rational and with no unrealistic expectations.
Ruman, however, is right. We're several years away from the practice facility and some needed upgrades to the Rac. Barring a miracle, I don't think Eddie lasts that long.
 
We lost to Clemson, St Johns, Creighton and I believe Wake Forest at full strength. Doorson was in the lineup in 2014-15 when we lost to teams by 30 points!

So I don't see where we suddenly become a .500 team when our players return. Not when I'm deciding whether Jordan gets another year. History says Rutgers, and Jordan, will not do it.
We were never at full strength this year. Doorson has been out all year. Freeman was just getting acclimated coming from Juco and looked like a capable low post scorer and an offensive and defensive rebounder and a good passer and blocked some shots. In the St John's game, Eddie went to Freeman to stem the comeback and he hit 2 straight buckets on moves down low. We have no one to do that now. In Wake game he was limping and Eddieleft him in the game and if he was healthy we win easily
You also said Freeman is going to be putting up 20 a game. You tend to be hyperbolic in your optimism.
if he is healthy and Corey is here , put it in the books!! I will double down on my prediction. What do you think?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RUMountie
that's a stretch, if he was CJ Fair there would be more offers. He is a flyer, a guy with potential. Saying he is CJ Fair is similar to talk that Nigel Johnson is like Magic. For years I have heard people talk about potential recruits and talk about their tapes and how good they looked and for years when they start playing its not as impressive as the tapes. You could be right but there is no reason to believe you are right either until it happens
I didn't say he would be CJFair, I said from his tape he reminds me of CJ Fair.. We as Rutgers fans would love it if he turned out to be as good as Fair was!! You have no idea if it is a stretch, and number of offers are not the proof..I trust my eyes and although it is hard to make assessments based on tape if you have not seen someone live, that is all I have to go on .Of Course when he takes the floor at the Rac or during practice a true assessment can be made. Nothing on his tape suggests he will be a dud!!!
 
We were never at full strength this year. Doorson has been out all year. Freeman was just getting acclimated coming from Juco and looked like a capable low post scorer and an offensive and defensive rebounder and a good passer and blocked some shots. In the St John's game, Eddie went to Freeman to stem the comeback and he hit 2 straight buckets on moves down low. We have no one to do that now. In Wake

if he is healthy and Corey is here , put it in the books!! I will double down on my prediction. What do you think?
Do you know how many players are averaging 20 points a game in the Big 10 this season?

*crickets*
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin
Yup, these delusional posters live in a vacuum. Sure,we might get better but so will other teams. RU better improve more than those teams improve or we won't make any climb in the standings.

A simple concept that often goes overlooked. Not that the 3 are anything that special, but three of the seven guys that actually play this year are gone next year. That's a lot of chemistry that has to develop. It's not a given that next year will be so much better.
I will guarantee replacing Daniels, Grier, and Lewis with Nigel, Freeman and Doorson, will result in a much better team next year. Who wouldn't think that??
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUMountie
Do you know how many players are averaging 20 points a game in the Big 10 this season?

*crickets*
How many points does Diamond Stone score a game on assists from Melo Tremble? The only reason all 5 Maryland starters do not average 20 points each is because they share the ball and if you placed any one of their starters on Rutgers they would score 20 a game. There is only one ball for 5 ultra talented guys. Freeman will be our low post scorer and like Stone getting dunks off Melo's passing so will Freeman from Corey' assists. I would be really surprised if Freeman doesn't get 10 points from 5 assists from Corey giving him layups or dunks. Did you see how many times in the first half Corey hit Laurent for layups against Illinois?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUMountie
How many points does Diamond Stone score a game on assists from Melo Tremble? The only reason all 5 Maryland starters do not average 20 points each is because they share the ball and if you placed any one of their starters on Rutgers they would score 20 a game. There is only one ball for 5 ultra talented guys. Freeman will be our low post scorer and like Stone getting dunks off Melo's passing so will Freeman from Corey' assists. I would be really surprised if Freeman doesn't get 10 points from 5 assists from Corey giving him layups or dunks. Did you see how many times in the first half Corey hit Laurent for layups against Illinois?
Wouldn't the same situation apply to RU if Freeman, Sanders, Laurent, Daily, Johnson, and either Diallo or Doorson develop into the players you believe they will be?
 
Do you know how many players are averaging 20 points a game in the Big 10 this season?

*crickets*
After my recent post, I just went to Big 10 statistics and no one averages 20 a game, but Hill and Nunn average 19.6 and 16.2, Uthoff and Jok 18.6 and 17.1, Yogi Farrell 19.2, Nigel Hayes18.4, Brandon Taylor 16.4 , Diamond stone and Melo Trimble at 14.9 and 14.7 and our Corey Sanders at 17 per game. The player in the role most like what Freeman's role will be is Hill at Illinois, their go to best player down low. Melo and Stone's averages of almost 15 per game is what I would expect from Corey and Freeman. However Corey will score likely less than 17 per night and Freeman off Corey's assists will pick up the extra few points .. Another comparison is Yogi at 19.2 and Thomas Bryant at 12.2. But unlike Maryland or Indiana Who each have 5 guys who can score and do not rely on any one guy to score more, we will be relying on Freeman to be our leading scorer, especially down low which will get him more shot attempts and likely a few more points.
Also remember that Iowa, Maryland and Purdue have blown out people so their starters have not played full games whereas Freeman will be playing almost the whole game because I doubt we will be blowing out anybody but I fully expect a lot of games to be undecided with 4 minutes to go.
Look what happened in the Iowa game, one of our better efforts losing 90-76. Peter Jok went for 29 and Jarod Uthoff 20 because they played the whole game. Freeman will be playing almost 35-40 minutes next year. It is more likely than not that Freeman will average 20 points per game and Corey averages less with more options next year.
 
Wouldn't the same situation apply to RU if Freeman, Sanders, Laurent, Daily, Johnson, and either Diallo or Doorson develop into the players you believe they will be?
Corey will more than likely see his scoring go down and assists up because he will shoot less shots. Laurent will also benefit from Corey's passing and out on the break. Right now Greg Lewis shoots anywhere from 2 shots a night to 10 , so Shaquille will likely shoot at least 2 and likely in the range of 6-10 because he should give us 8-10 per game, especially since Corey will be lobbing to him for dunks. Johnson or Williams should get 10-15 per game as the starter . So if Freeman gets20, Nigel or Mike 12.5, Shaquille 9 , Laurent 10-14 and Corey 10-14, that gives you 61.5 to 69.5 from our starters. Seems very reasonable if they gel and Freeman is still the focal point on offense.Also, with the exception of Corey and maybe Freeman, our other 3 starters are not nearly as talented as Maryland's . Melo, Suliman, Carter, Stone, and Layman are all NBA players. Carter at times has been more dominant down low and goes off for 15-20 per game..Freeman will be most like Carter except he will be the consistent focal point of our offense.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RUMountie
Freeman is not getting 20 ppg. Doorson more like 5 ppg if lucky and our starters nowhere near 69.5. You are overprojecting for everyone except Sanders who is going to be our leading scorer. Heyvits geat to be optimistic but these projections arent based in reality
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin
Freeman is not getting 20 ppg. Doorson more like 5 ppg if lucky and our starters nowhere near 69.5. You are overprojecting for everyone except Sanders who is going to be our leading scorer. Heyvits geat to be optimistic but these projections arent based in reality
What is Freeman scoring next year BAC?
 
Corey will more than likely see his scoring go down and assists up because he will shoot less shots. Laurent will also benefit from Corey's passing and out on the break. Right now Greg Lewis shoots anywhere from 2 shots a night to 10 , so Shaquille will likely shoot at least 2 and likely in the range of 6-10 because he should give us 8-10 per game, especially since Corey will be lobbing to him for dunks. Johnson or Williams should get 10-15 per game as the starter . So if Freeman gets20, Nigel or Mike 12.5, Shaquille 9 , Laurent 10-14 and Corey 10-14, that gives you 61.5 to 69.5 from our starters. Seems very reasonable if they gel and Freeman is still the focal point on offense.Also, with the exception of Corey and maybe Freeman, our other 3 starters are not nearly as talented as Maryland's . Melo, Suliman, Carter, Stone, and Layman are all NBA players. Carter at times has been more dominant down low and goes off for 15-20 per game..Freeman will be most like Carter except he will be the consistent focal point of our offense.
New question, how many teams in the Big 10 have four double-digit scorers this season?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUChoppin
New question, how many teams in the Big 10 have four double-digit scorers this season?
I will check out Big 10 statistics in a moment but while we are at it go to those statistics and tell me where RU's biggest deficiencies are?
 
goru7, I went back and found just 7 players in the last 15 years in the Big Ten who have averaged 20 ppg. It's just not going to happen.

I'll answer the other question too... there are just two teams in the Big Ten right now with four double digit scorers. Maryland (with Melo Trimple being the high at 14.8) and Minnesota (with four guys ranging from 10.3-13.4). Interestingly, Maryland is the best team in the conference right now and Minnesota is the worst. 8 other teams have 3 double digit scorers (Indiana, Michigan, MSU, Nebraska, NW, OSU, PA St., Purdue, Wisconsin).
 
goru7, I went back and found just 7 players in the last 15 years in the Big Ten who have averaged 20 ppg. It's just not going to happen.

I'll answer the other question too... there are just two teams in the Big Ten right now with four double digit scorers. Maryland (with Melo Trimple being the high at 14.8) and Minnesota (with four guys ranging from 10.3-13.4). Interestingly, Maryland is the best team in the conference right now and Minnesota is the worst. 8 other teams have 3 double digit scorers (Indiana, Michigan, MSU, Nebraska, NW, OSU, PA St., Purdue, Wisconsin).
Okay but are the starting 5 of Indiana, Iowa, Maryland at least close? Like if they average 8-9 per game. Would be surprised if not true .

In my earlier projections I calculated 10-15 for either Mike orNigel as the starter but I further believe strongly we will get that much out of the 2 guard spot, an area holding us back now. Also between Shaquille and Diallo we should get 8-10 points as well, another area we are lacking in now .
 
goru7, I went back and found just 7 players in the last 15 years in the Big Ten who have averaged 20 ppg. It's just not going to happen.

I'll answer the other question too... there are just two teams in the Big Ten right now with four double digit scorers. Maryland (with Melo Trimple being the high at 14.8) and Minnesota (with four guys ranging from 10.3-13.4). Interestingly, Maryland is the best team in the conference right now and Minnesota is the worst. 8 other teams have 3 double digit scorers (Indiana, Michigan, MSU, Nebraska, NW, OSU, PA St., Purdue, Wisconsin).
What do you think Freeman as our primary scorer will average next year if Healthy and if Coreyis our point guard? Do you think he has better hands than any recent big guy we have had?
 
I will check out Big 10 statistics in a moment but while we are at it go to those statistics and tell me where RU's biggest deficiencies are?
Choppin is right just 2 programs. I think your expections for year over year improvement are significantly overblown.

Our deficiencies? Cover every aspect of the college game. The real question is what do we excel at? Right now nothing.

Offensively, we're getting better because Corey is getting better and Grier is having a much better year than I expected. The rest of the team is a mess. The players are usually slow to the pick, hardly penetrate, are poor shooters. We don't really have an organized offense. It turns helter smelter the minute it gets into the hands of Danials, Foreman or Lewis. Our biggest problem on O is no consistent low post offense. Without that, the guards will have consistently difficulty getting their shots open and in rhythm.

Defensively we're a mess. Our weak side defender is almost always late and the rotations, in many cases, aren't just slow but don't come at all. That's why you see so many open jump shots for the opposition on the wings. We're too slow on the perimeter and not disciplined in the interior. Our bigs will foul on almost every fake. It's incredibly frustrating to watch. Some is talent, some is desire, and some is coaching.

I could continue on with our problems but it serves no purpose. This program from a basketball playing perspective is in terrible shape.

The additions next year are mostly unproven recruits or marginal B10 talents. This program, much more than football, needs a complete rebuild. That requires a proven college coach with success who has a plan and a direction for program. At this point in his tenure, as much as I like EJ as a person, it's clear that he's not a program rebuilders. I've never heard espouse on a big picture plan for the future or how he was going to accomplish that goal.

He's a steward not a builder of programs. I think his job here is done. We're ready to move to the next stage of bringing the program back from the Mike Rice debacle.

The next coach will be younger, driven, with a plan for success. I'm looking forward to seeing this program grow. With the right hire, we can be very successful.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ScarletRunner
I honestly don't know what Freeman will end up looking like in Big Ten play, because I've mostly seen him against bad teams.

The teams he faced this year, their Sagarin rank, and his points/boards:
48 Clemson - 13 pts, 3 rbs
51 Creighton - 14 pts, 7 rbs
114 Wake Forest - 5 pts, 4 rbs
202 St. Johns - 7 pts, 4 rbs
303 Howard - 17 points, 7 rbs
332 Central Ark - 23 pts, 8 rbs
Div 3 RU-Newark - 13 pts, 4 rbs

8 of our conference games this year against are teams ranked higher than the best team he's faced (Clemson). 7 more games against teams ranked higher than Wake. That's 15 of 18 conference games that are against better teams than all but two of the teams he's faced so far. There's no way to know how well he'll do with that step up in competition. Against the teams he's already faced, he's averaged 13.1 pts and 5.3 rbs... there's no reason to assume against a large step up in competition, he's going to improve his scoring by more than 50% - or even maintain what he's shown so far.

Also for what it's worth, regarding Big Ten teams with 4 double digit scorers:
2014-15: None
2013-14: Wisconsin (10.4-13.6 - Final Four)
2012-13: Michigan (10.7-19.2 - NC runner up), Minnesota (10.0-13.9 - NCAA Rd of 32)
2011-12: None
2010-11: OSU (11.8-17.2 - Sweet Sixteen)
2009-10: Illinois (10.4-15.1 - NIT quarters), OSU (12.7-20.3 - Sweet Sixteen)
2008-09: None
2007-08: Indiana (10.0-21.3 - NCAA Rd of 64)
2006-07: OSU (10.5-15.5 - NC runner up)
2005-06: Michigan (10.9-17.5 - NC runner up), OSU (10.2-12.4 - NCAA Rd of 32), Purdue (10.1-15.2 - five players)

So, in 10 complete seasons... there have been just 11 teams to accomplish having 4 players average in double digits. Those include 3 NC runners up, 1 Final Four, 2 Sweet Sixteens, 2 Rd of 32s, 1 Rd of 64, 1 NIT quarterfinal, and just 1 team that missed the postseason (despite having 5 players in double digits). Only two managed to do it with 4 double digit scorers AND a 20 point scorer.

While I admire your optimism, your expectations and assumptions are entirely out of whack.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT