For perspective, you both expect Jacob Young to be significantly more productive on both offense and defense than both Geo Baker and, if you look back at stats, Corey Sanders ever were under Pike.
Meanwhile, Jacob Young played on two teams at Texas in a P5 conference (arguably worse than the B1G) and had much lower numbers his freshman and sophomore years than Geo did his first 2 seasons at Rutgers. Notably, the team his freshman year sucked and went 4-14 in his freshman year, and his team sophomore year was mediocre, going 8-10. He averaged around 16/mpg on both of these teams, and 4-6/ppg over two seasons. These teams are comparable to the two teams Geo was on in the B1G, where he averaged 30/mpg and 10-13/ppg on 1 bad and 1 mediocre P5 team.
Despite this, you both expect Young (who I like a lot, mind you) to outperform Geo to a great extent on both ends of the floor.
How is this not just wish fulfillment with the shiny new toy that you haven't seen the flaws in yet?
Jacob Young stats:
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/players/jacob-young-1.html