Zero coverage. a wire story only. couldn't be bothered to send one writer to Long Island! Everyone was in NYC washing Jabrill''s balls.
There was a time when the sports section oft the ledger was great.They suck. Always have and always will.
I can under stand not sending reporters to away games, but Stony Brook is a 2-hr drive from Newark. Ridiculous that they didn't send Sarge or Dunleavy.
They had a story about all of the cabinet positions CC has allegedly turned downZero coverage. a wire story only. couldn't be bothered to send one writer to Long Island! Everyone was in NYC washing Jabrill''s balls.
Growing up I always looked forward to reading Ledger sports in the morning and the Elizabeth Daily Journal in the afternoon. Back then the Journal actually had high school baseball box scores and individual basketball scoring. Both papers had great sports writers back then like Gene Picker and Bill Kennedy, not to mention Jerry Izenberg.
Papers are a shell of their former selves and will soon disappear altogether.
I don't want biased negative coverage but I also don't want biased positive coverage either. I don't always agree with everything a Star-Ledger / NJ.com sportswriter says but I think they've been pretty easy on RU since Hobbs has taken over. There were certainly opportunities to bury the football staff this Fall and they didn't.I agree with your assessment of the current plight of traditional newspapers but shouldn't that exact reasoning be pushing them into trying to cultivate a readership base among RU supporters rather than chase them away with their biased negative coverage.
Same on BTN. There were 11 B1G MBB games yesterday. The show they had on last night/this morning had highlights of 10. There was 1 game that didn't even get mentioned. Can you guess which one?
I don't want biased negative coverage but I also don't want biased positive coverage either. I don't always agree with everything a Star-Ledger / NJ.com sportswriter says but I think they've been pretty easy on RU since Hobbs has taken over. There were certainly opportunities to bury the football staff this Fall and they didn't.
That's not bias that's an editorial decision, albeit a disappointing one, based on their increasingly limited resources and staff. Outside our ScarletNation basketball forum bubble I don't agree that our team is a huge story. Agree that posting non-Rutgers basketball stories, especially about Peppers, on the "Rutgers Basketball Page" on NJ.com is annoying though. No argument there.I don't want biased coverage either but the basketball team is a huge positive story. Considering the coverage they were willing to give the Mike Rice situation and the fact that they ran a story about how Coach P never got to say goodbye at SB you would think there was a story here worth spending some time on. Instead, they had an article in the basketball board about Jabril Peppers. Really!
I agree with your assessment of the current plight of traditional newspapers but shouldn't that exact reasoning be pushing them into trying to cultivate a readership base among RU supporters rather than chase them away with their biased negative coverage.
Yeah, it was called the Newark Evening News.There was a time when the sports section oft the ledger was great.
Sadly it's was a long time ago.
Didn't see ... But what if RU lost?Same on BTN. There were 11 B1G MBB games yesterday. The show they had on last night/this morning had highlights of 10. There was 1 game that didn't even get mentioned. Can you guess which one?
Even if the game was produced by someone else it aired on ESPN3. Media share content with one another, so having access isn't a problem.In their defense, the game was not really aired on TV. it was on the ESPN web coverage (ESPN3) I believe. They may not have had access to any of the coverage. I am only guessing but there may not be any highlights available.
There were other games involving Big Ten teams aired by an ESPN Network or on ESPN3 so your theory is not accurate.In their defense, the game was not really aired on TV. it was on the ESPN web coverage (ESPN3) I believe. They may not have had access to any of the coverage. I am only guessing but there may not be any highlights available.
Same here. We had the Bergen Record delivered and looked forward to reading the sports section daily.Growing up I always looked forward to reading Ledger sports in the morning and the Elizabeth Daily Journal in the afternoon. Back then the Journal actually had high school baseball box scores and individual basketball scoring. Both papers had great sports writers back then like Gene Picker and Bill Kennedy, not to mention Jerry Izenberg.
Papers are a shell of their former selves and will soon disappear altogether.
There were other games involving Big Ten teams aired by an ESPN Network or on ESPN3 so your theory is not accurate.
That's not bias that's an editorial decision, albeit a disappointing one, based on their increasingly limited resources and staff. Outside our ScarletNation basketball forum bubble I don't agree that our team is a huge story. Agree that posting non-Rutgers basketball stories, especially about Peppers, on the "Rutgers Basketball Page" on NJ.com is annoying though. No argument there.
The Mike Rice story was totally driven by national media and the Ledger was not a leader in that coverage in any way, shape or form. In fact, virtually nothing was made about the original Rice suspension/fine and readers of the local papers were left totally in the dark about what he was suspended/fined for until the ESPN report blew the lid off over 3 months later.
Bullshit. You don't know if a game is going to win before it starts, do you?They like to believe that when anything good happens at RU, it really didn't happen. This win doesn't fit their agenda so they chose not to cover it. It keeps their narrative alive and well.
So they can't pickup an AP story, look at the stats or watch on ESPN360 like I did and write a story? That's the bullshit. Some people just don't get Manahan's agenda and never will.Bullshit. You don't know if a game is going to win before it starts, do you?
Seriously. Some people ...
There was a time when the sports section oft the ledger was great.
Sadly it's was a long time ago.