As of the official grid in one of this morning's ny tabs . Money must be coming in heavy on Illinois . If it gets over 7, I am tempted to take the home team. .
As of the official grid in one of this morning's ny tabs . Money must be coming in heavy on Illinois . If it gets over 7, I am tempted to take the home team. .
I disagree. I wouldn't bet the house, but I think we cover this week, if not win outright. Go RU!!!!Don't.
As of the official grid in one of this morning's ny tabs . Money must be coming in heavy on Illinois . If it gets over 7, I am tempted to take the home team. .
A 4-1 team playing away should never give 6pts. People must really believe that we are going to lay down.
Historically, they don't get psyched against weak opponents so it plays in RU's favor. Still, without a QB, their D can stop the run all day. On the other hand, if they can't rush our QB like the better teams, we might see a different passing game. RU with 7 is ok for me.Rutgers will face everyone's best effort here on out. No one wants to lose to Rutgers after the beating Michigan put on us. It is unthinkable and fear of that happening to teams fairly close to us in level, will spur them on. Likewise, if Illinois really is our clear best hope to win a game, maybe we'll see Rutgers best effort.
1-4A 4-1 team playing away should never give 6pts. People must really believe that we are going to lay down.
But this is not that.. this is a blood-in-the-water kind of thing. Perhaps even Michigan had a little more "shark" in them after seeing us get smacked around by Ohio State.Historically, they don't get psyched against weak opponents so it plays in RU's favor.
As of the official grid in one of this morning's ny tabs . Money must be coming in heavy on Illinois . If it gets over 7, I am tempted to take the home team. .
I thought it was +6 as far back as Tuesday. Started around +3 and jumped immediately.
but these are not sharks, these are kids who know a W is a W and they get up or not based on the toughness of the opponent. If everyone is betting one way, the percentages say go the other way, as the public is more often wrong than Vegas.But this is not that.. this is a blood-in-the-water kind of thing. Perhaps even Michigan had a little more "shark" in them after seeing us get smacked around by Ohio State.
I hope so but the O just seems so out of synch the last two weeks. I think if Lav can perform on the New Mex level we might have a shot.but these are not sharks, these are kids who know a W is a W and they get up or not based on the toughness of the opponent. If everyone is betting one way, the percentages say go the other way, as the public is more often wrong than Vegas.
lav will look like the 2015 Indiana kid against the Illini.
Without Grant, a decent OL, a decent QB, and healthy LB'ers.....I'd be thrilled if we kept it within 7 points.
We are in trouble.
What have you seen that convinces you Lav can hit a receiver even if they can get open?They have 2 good DE's. That's it. The rest of their D is suspect - with their back 7 being very much so - as per an Illini poster in another thread. Take a look at the team stat thread I posted the other day comparing their D with Iowa's. If - IF - Laviano can hit open receivers, early, we should be able to run on them. We've got to win the TO battle, the penalty battle, and execute. Both teams are God-awful on ST's, too, so that could be interesting!
What have you seen that convinces you Lav can hit a receiver even if they can get open?
A decent QB ? I would be thrilled if we had close to a medicore QB. If so, we win this game easily.Without Grant, a decent OL, a decent QB, and healthy LB'ers.....I'd be thrilled if we kept it within 7 points.
We are in trouble.
A decent QB ? I would be thrilled if we had close to a medicore QB. If so, we win this game easily.
I'm a fan. Hope springs eternal before almost every game!What have you seen that convinces you Lav can hit a receiver even if they can get open?
I meant, without a decent QB or OL
OL and QB are 1a 1b imoHear ya and I mean without " an even mediocre QB". .... which is even below a decent QB.
We need to fix this position first.
OL and QB are 1a 1b imo
It is with utmost sincerity that I say we need more fans like you and fewer cranky pessimistic bastards like me.I'm a fan. Hope springs eternal before almost every game!
Our OL was better last year and we still had the lowest QB rating in the B1G.
Sorry QB need is 1a.
I don't think that is true.[/QUOTE
Sorry.. two QBs had lower ratings.
With a QB rating 187.3 CL was ranked 12th in the B1G.
As a starter after 1 and a half seasons , we have hit bottom at QB.