IF you took the time to look at what I was replying to you would see the answer.
The post was something like "no player develops and gets better in college and they leave with what they had".
My response had nothing to do with records or team or making a tourney. It was 3 examples off the top of my 48 year's of observation of Rutgers bball.
I was there for all of their careers. You can provide your opinions as to why they got better but that doesn't change the fact that they did.
I'm sure I can statistically find plenty of more examples but not going to waste my time because numbers don't lie and the group here just want to insert "buts and considerations".
but here's a quick look at DS... I know I know. His 3 pt shooting % went up from 29.5% first three years to 45% senior year because they moved the line back...and he doubled his scoring avg because he played in the BE that last year who's SOS was 10.6 (not shown on this chart) vs. 5-6 each of first 3 years . oh wait, what?
ason | School | Conf | Class | G | GS | MP | FG | FGA | FG% | 2P | 2PA | 2P% | 3P | 3PA | 3P% | FT | FTA | FT% | ORB | DRB | TRB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | PTS | | SOS |
---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1991-92 | Rutgers | A-10 | FR | 30 | 10 | 19.8 | 1.6 | 4.7 | .336 | 0.9 | 2.5 | .360 | 0.7 | 2.2 | .308 | 0.8 | 1.4 | .581 | | | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 4.6 | | 4.78 |
---|
1992-93 | Rutgers | A-10 | SO | 28 | 28 | 32.1 | 2.9 | 6.9 | .420 | 2.4 | 5.5 | .435 | 0.5 | 1.4 | .359 | 2.4 | 2.9 | .840 | | | 2.7 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 8.7 | | 6.38 |
---|
1994-95 | Rutgers | A-10 | JR | 28 | 19 | 26.3 | 2.6 | 7.4 | .356 | 2.0 | 4.9 | .413 | 0.6 | 2.5 | .243 | 1.6 | 2.5 | .620 | | | 2.6 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 7.5 | | 4.92 |
---|
1995-96 | Rutgers | Big East | SR | 27 | | 33.9 | 6.0 | 14.3 | .421 | 3.4 | 8.4 | .410 | 2.6 | 5.9 | .438 | 2.5 | 3.5 | .723 | | | 3.5 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | | | 17.2 | | |
---|
Get it now? It was just a FACTUAL example of a player at Rutgers getting better .