The bottom 4 of the Big 12 is separating itself out.Would think B12 gets in more than B1G based on everything we know but will be close as always.
Bubbletology (not worth its own thread, but I wanted to update how many bids the Big 10 is looking at)
Ironclad 1-bid leagues: 16
Even if a team ran the table in the conference and lost in the conference title game, they wouldn’t get an at-large. Clearest example might be UC Santa Barbara currently at 12-2 (3-0) but with zero Q1 wins, no future opportunities, and a Q4 loss already. Not to mention the extreme unlikeliness of teams in these league actually going undefeated.
16 bids
Possible 2-bid leagues: 8
This is the CAA (Charleston), A-Sun (Liberty), MAAC (Iona), MAC (Kent State), WAC (Sam Houston State), A-10 (Dayton/SLU), and C-USA (FAU/UNT/UAB), and WCC (Gonzaga/SMC). These range from very unlikely (MAAC) to basically a lock (WCC). This year’s A-10 stinks but the committee always seems to have a soft spot for it. I’ll say eight auto-bids plus a second for the WCC and C-USA plus one wildcard.
11 bids
That leaves 41 up for grabs among the top eight conferences. Eyeballing it (2.5 basically means they’ll get either 2 or 3 bids):
AAC: 2.5 (Houston, Memphis, UCF in the mix)
MWC: 3.5 (San Diego State, Utah State, Boise State, New Mexico, Nevada, UNLV)
P12: 3.5 (UCLA, Arizona, Utah, Arizona State)
Big East: 5 (UConn, Creighton, Providence, Marquette, Xavier)
ACC: 5.5 (Duke, Virginia, UNC, Miami, Clemson, Pitt, NC State)
B12: 6.5 (Kansas, Iowa State, Kansas State, Texas, TCU, Baylor, pick one of the bottom 4)
SEC: 6 (Tennessee, Alabama, Auburn, Arkansas, Missouri, Mississippi State, Kentucky)
Big Ten: 8.5 (Everyone except Nebraska and Minnesota)
Teams could rise up but in general it’ll come at the expense of someone else (ie USC could make it but they’d probably need to stack wins over Utah or Arizona State to do so).
Am I being too bullish or bearish on any leagues? The ACC and the Big 12 could end up being 1.5 over my projection depending on how the standings shake out but I think right now they’re likely to be 5 or 6 and 6 or 7, respectively.
Would think B12 gets in more than B1G based on everything we know but will be close as always.
Wouldn’t be so sure on Mountain West. Teams have gaudy records and need some western teams.Basically on target. Wake has a real shot in the ACC. The Mountain West will not get 4 this season. The only way CUSA gets a 2nd is if Fla Atlantic does not win the conference tourney, Big 10 has 12 schools competing for bids. I have seen some guys have 11 schools in at that moment...wont happen but 9 is a real possibility.
Basically on target. Wake has a real shot in the ACC. The Mountain West will not get 4 this season. The only way CUSA gets a 2nd is if Fla Atlantic does not win the conference tourney, Big 10 has 12 schools competing for bids. I have seen some guys have 11 schools in at that moment...wont happen but 9 is a real possibility.
RPI has never made any sense to me.RPI is very weird at this point in the season.
Utah clocks in at 9th in the Pac-12 and 124th nationally.... despite being 5-1 in conference play.
Maryland is apparently 3rd best in the Big Ten and 33rd nationally, despite a 2-3 conference record with blowout losses at Michigan and Rutgers.
Charleston is ranked higher than UCLA, and Ohio State is ranked lower than Louisiana. Hofstra is apparently better positioned than Rutgers right now.
RPI has never made any sense to me.
Are you saying Hofstra has a higher RPI Than RU?
This isn’t me complaining, I’m genuinely curious what mathematical formula being being used that ranks an 11-7 Hofstra team with a loss to North Carolina A&T higher than RU?
With RPI don't forget,
0.6 Home win/ 1.0 Neutral win/ 1.4 home loss
1.4 Road win/ 1.0 Neutral loss/ 0.6 road loss
For example Rutgers(12-5)
Home 10-2, 6.0-2.8
Neutral 0-1, 0-1.0
Road 2-2, 2.8-1.2
RPI Record 8.8-5.0
Schedule of Strength and the 25/50/25 plays into it,but I never, going back when the RPI wad the only tool and printed in the newspapers in the 80s and 90s only,. liked how they unfairly weighted road wins against losing record teams over big home wins against winning record teams, it never balanced out the way it should have.Oral Roberts (13-4... but 4 games against non-D1)
Home 5-0, 3.0-0
Road 4-4, 6.4-2.4
RPI Record 9.4-2.4
Their big road wins are against Texas Southern, Tulsa, Omaha, and Denver. They've played 4 teams with a pulse (Houston, St. Mary's, Utah St, New Mexico) and went 0-4. Their best win is over Liberty.
But they're 9 ranks higher in RPI than we are with wins @Purdue, @Northwestern, vs. Indiana, vs. Maryland, and vs. Wake Forest
Yes - RPI ends up rewarding you for playing D2 teams rather than RPI 300+ teams because D2 teams are ignored in the formula. That’s the deal with Oral Roberts. A whole bunch of their home games were D2 teams. So those don’t count in the formula and they get a huge boost because it seems like they played on the road more than they did.RPI takes 25% your record, 50% your opponents' records, and 25% your opponents' opponents' records. RU jumped 18 places in RPI last night to 49... right behind St. Louis (11-6) and 9 spots behind Oral Roberts (13-4). Meanwhile, Northwestern drops to 56th (ahead of Ohio State at 58).
NET certainly has its problems, but RPI isn't some shining example of "getting it right".
Hahahaha I always noticed RPI was a bit funky, but yikes that’s weirdRPI takes 25% your record, 50% your opponents' records, and 25% your opponents' opponents' records. RU jumped 18 places in RPI last night to 49... right behind St. Louis (11-6) and 9 spots behind Oral Roberts (13-4). Meanwhile, Northwestern drops to 56th (ahead of Ohio State at 58).
NET certainly has its problems, but RPI isn't some shining example of "getting it right".
Mostly very good updates except I don’t think Syracuse is anywhere near “lurking”. Honestly - 3 of their ACC wins may as well be American East wins. They won @ UofL, home vs BC and @ ND.Bubbletology games of note last night:
Arkansas fell to 1-3 in the SEC. They're not in any danger yet but Trevon Brazile is out for the season and anticipated lottery pick Nick Smith Jr. has barely played with a knee inury. Keep an eye on their next two: At Vanderbilt and at Missouri.
Creighton is down to 9-8. All 8 losses are to top-100 teams but they've got to start stacking some wins soon. A home game is next against Providence.
West Virginia lost at home to Baylor to fall to 0-4 in the Big 12, another result separating the top 6 from the bottom 4 of that league. They've got a someone's-gotta-win game against Oklahoma next.
Indiana is hurtling toward the NIT with another big loss.
UCF knocked off Memphis in double OT in Orlando. AAC is very much alive for three bids but if UCF sweeps Memphis...
UNLV took a home loss to Boise State.
Charleston bolstered their at-large resume with a win at UNC-W. They're now 17-1 with the only loss to UNC. No wins over tournament teams but the CAA is a potential bid thief league if they keep rolling and then stumble in the conference tournament.
Lurking: Texas A&M (3-0 in the SEC), Syracuse (4-2 in the ACC), Wake Forest (4-2 in the ACC)
Fading: Virginia Tech (1-5 in the ACC), Mississippi State (1-4 since an 11-0 start)
Mostly very good updates except I don’t think Syracuse is anywhere near “lurking”. Honestly - 3 of their ACC wins may as well be American East wins. They won @ UofL, home vs BC and @ ND.
Bubbletology (not worth its own thread, but I wanted to update how many bids the Big 10 is looking at)
Ironclad 1-bid leagues: 16
Even if a team ran the table in the conference and lost in the conference title game, they wouldn’t get an at-large. Clearest example might be UC Santa Barbara currently at 12-2 (3-0) but with zero Q1 wins, no future opportunities, and a Q4 loss already. Not to mention the extreme unlikeliness of teams in these league actually going undefeated.
16 bids
Possible 2-bid leagues: 8
This is the CAA (Charleston), A-Sun (Liberty), MAAC (Iona), MAC (Kent State), WAC (Sam Houston State), A-10 (Dayton/SLU), and C-USA (FAU/UNT/UAB), and WCC (Gonzaga/SMC). These range from very unlikely (MAAC) to basically a lock (WCC). This year’s A-10 stinks but the committee always seems to have a soft spot for it. I’ll say eight auto-bids plus a second for the WCC and C-USA plus one wildcard.
11 bids
That leaves 41 up for grabs among the top eight conferences. Eyeballing it (2.5 basically means they’ll get either 2 or 3 bids):
AAC: 2.5 (Houston, Memphis, UCF in the mix)
MWC: 3.5 (San Diego State, Utah State, Boise State, New Mexico, Nevada, UNLV)
P12: 3.5 (UCLA, Arizona, Utah, Arizona State)
Big East: 5 (UConn, Creighton, Providence, Marquette, Xavier)
ACC: 5.5 (Duke, Virginia, UNC, Miami, Clemson, Pitt, NC State)
B12: 6.5 (Kansas, Iowa State, Kansas State, Texas, TCU, Baylor, pick one of the bottom 4)
SEC: 6 (Tennessee, Alabama, Auburn, Arkansas, Missouri, Mississippi State, Kentucky)
Big Ten: 8.5 (Everyone except Nebraska and Minnesota)
Teams could rise up but in general it’ll come at the expense of someone else (ie USC could make it but they’d probably need to stack wins over Utah or Arizona State to do so).
Am I being too bullish or bearish on any leagues? The ACC and the Big 12 could end up being 1.5 over my projection depending on how the standings shake out but I think right now they’re likely to be 5 or 6 and 6 or 7, respectively.
Cuse is lurking and they inevitably get better as year goes along. Powers that be love Cuse too.Mostly very good updates except I don’t think Syracuse is anywhere near “lurking”. Honestly - 3 of their ACC wins may as well be American East wins. They won @ UofL, home vs BC and @ ND.
Xavier beat West Virginia at home, Florida on a neutral, and won at Cincinnati. They did plenty enough in non-conference and now they've already beaten UConn and Creighton in the Big East. The Indiana loss will age poorly but that's when IU was at full strength, and their only other losses are to Duke and Gonzaga.Good take. And the fact that most people have Creighton in and Nebraska with no shot is probably right, but also another indication of how deep the Big 10 is. Nebraska beat Creighton by 10 points at Creighton. Also Xavier did not beat a single decent power 5 team out of conference and lost at home to Indiana. They are feasting in the weak half of the Big East. Similarly, Marquette has 1 good OOC win, but lost to both Purdue and Wisconsin (and the Wisconsin game was at Xavier).
That soft schedule is a double edged sword. I have a coworker that is a Clemson guy and we were talking hoops earlier. They have two Q4 losses saddling their net at 59. They have only four games left to add "good" wins that pump the resume. I could see them being like Big Ten teams have in the past with a gaudy overall record but left for the NIT because of the lack of high profile wins.Clemson is going to get there because of a clown schedule. Duke once, Virginia once, North Carolina once, Miami once, Pittsburgh once. Double plays against Louisville, Florida State, Notre Dame, Georgia Tech, and a rapidly deteriorating Virginia Tech. Good god that could not be easier.
That soft schedule is a double edged sword. I have a coworker that is a Clemson guy and we were talking hoops earlier. They have two Q4 losses saddling their net at 59. They have only four games left to add "good" wins that pump the resume. I could see them being like Big Ten teams have in the past with a gaudy overall record but left for the NIT because of the lack of high profile wins.
Currently, these are Clemson's best wins:
home vs #28 NC State by 14
at #58 Virginia Tech (in freefall, as kc8 stated) by three
at #64 Pitt by a point
home vs #52 Penn State by seven
home #81 Wake Forest by 20
That's it for wins over the top 100.
Add in a two point loss at #245 South Carolina and an 18 pt neutral site to #265 Loyola-Chicago, and their resume is not strong right now.
Wow, playing the likes of West Virginia, Florida, Cincinatti, Indiana, Duke and Gonzaga in your non-conference schedule should be worth something.Xavier beat West Virginia at home, Florida on a neutral, and won at Cincinnati. They did plenty enough in non-conference and now they've already beaten UConn and Creighton in the Big East. The Indiana loss will age poorly but that's when IU was at full strength, and their only other losses are to Duke and Gonzaga.
Yup not locking them in but they have a super super easy pathSimilar to Wake last year who all the January bracketologists had as a lock last year.
Too early to lock them in
Yup not locking them in but they have a super super easy path