ADVERTISEMENT

OT: 2024 CFB TV ratings

Am i blind i dont see our game
The blurb at the bottom of Sports Media Watch where I get these tables.

Why are there no ratings for SEC Network, ACC Network and more?​

The television networks pay Nielsen to measure viewership for their events. In some cases, they may choose not to. In a statement to Sports Media Watch, ESPN explained its rationale for not subscribing to Nielsen measurement for SEC Network, ACC Network, Longhorn Network and more:

ESPN: “We regularly evaluate measurement options and currently use ComScore for all demographic, viewership and research data for ESPN’s college conference networks. We have found that this best suits our needs across the board.”
 
Not great. Oh well. Keep winning and our ratings will increase
not great? wtf is wrong is with you. Every damn post is just presents you as a miserable cok

2mm and 3.5 high is outstanding! ESPN marketed the shit out of their game, FOX did not and the school isn't marketing the program at all or rather, no where near what they should be!

the week before, Washington has 300k

we were up against #8 Miami that went to the wire


log off, buy a clue, come back
 
Last edited:
not great? wtf is wrong is with you. Every damn post is just presents you as a miserable cok

2mm and 3.5 high is outstanding! ESPN marketed the shit out of their game, FOX did not and the school isn't marketing the program at all or rather, no where near what they should be!

the week before, Washington has 300k

we were up against #8 Miami that went to the wire


log off, buy a clue, come back

Yeesh. Sorry to strike a chord. And just to correct your post, it was 2.5 high, not 3.5. I’d agree 3.5 high would be good!

compared to other weeks, no..no great. Lowest rated Friday night game yet for FOX.

Agree. ESPN game took viewers away as I predicted it would.
 
Given the Miami game, 1.93M is great. Every other Fox Friday game had crap on ESPN.
Sucks that we went up against Miami and an exciting game at that.....

With that said, our rating is 3rd compared to games last year on ESPN-ESPN2-FS1 Thursday/Friday games.
FOX Fridays is new this year. Seems like FOX-ESPN is making money this year....

2023
Week 1
Louisville - Georgia Tech ESPN 1.65M
Central Mich - Mich St FS1 1.06M

Week 2
Illinois - Kansas ESPN2 .7M

Week 3
Army - UTSA ESPN .92M

Week 4
Wisconsin - Purdue FS1 1.19M
NC State - Virginia ESPN 1.59M

Week 5
Louisville - NC State ESPN 1.89M
Utah - Oregon State FS1 1.28M
Cincy - BYU ESPN 1.23M

Week 6
Nebraska - Illinois FS1 1.36M
Kansas St - Okla St ESPN 2.27M

Week 7
Tulane - Memphis ESPN 1.72M
Stanford - Colorado ESPN 3.29M

Week 8
SMU - Temple ESPN .55M

Week 9
Syracuse - Virginia Tech ESPN .78M -Thursday

Week 10
Wake Forest - Duke ESPN .81M -Thursday
TCU - Texas Tech FS1 .62M -Thursday
Boston College - Syracuse ESPN2 1.1M -Friday

Week 11
Virginia - Louisville ESPN 1.29M
North Texas - SMU ESPN2 .62M

Week 12
Boston College - Pitt ESPN 1.03M -Thursday
Colorado - Wash St FS1 .73M -Friday

2024
Week 1
NDSU - Colorado ESPN 4.76M -Thursday
North Carolina - Minn FOX 1.06M -Thursday
Temple - # 16 Oklahoma ESPN 1.67M -Friday
TCU - Stanford ESPN 1.65M -Friday
Western Mich - Wisky FS1 .95M -Friday

Week 2
BYU - SMU ESPN2 .92M
Duke - Northwestern FS1 .51M

Week 3
Ariz St - Tex St ESPN .99M -Thursday
UNLV - Kansas ESPN 1.32M -Friday
#20 Arizona - #14 Kansas St FOX 2.58M -Friday

Week 4
#24 Illinois - #22 Nebraska FOX 4.21M
Stanford - Syracuse ESPN 1.37M

Week 5
#7 Miami - Virginia Tech ESPN 3.3M
Rutgers - Washington FOX 1.9M

Week 6
Houston - TCU ESPN
Michigan St - Oregon FOX
Syracuse - UNLV FS1
 
Given the Miami game, 1.93M is great. Every other Fox Friday game had crap on ESPN.
Sucks that we went up against Miami and an exciting game at that.....

With that said, our rating is 3rd compared to games last year on ESPN-ESPN2-FS1 Thursday/Friday games.
FOX Fridays is new this year. Seems like FOX-ESPN is making money this year....

2023
Week 1
Louisville - Georgia Tech ESPN 1.65M
Central Mich - Mich St FS1 1.06M

Week 2
Illinois - Kansas ESPN2 .7M

Week 3
Army - UTSA ESPN .92M

Week 4
Wisconsin - Purdue FS1 1.19M
NC State - Virginia ESPN 1.59M

Week 5
Louisville - NC State ESPN 1.89M
Utah - Oregon State FS1 1.28M
Cincy - BYU ESPN 1.23M

Week 6
Nebraska - Illinois FS1 1.36M
Kansas St - Okla St ESPN 2.27M

Week 7
Tulane - Memphis ESPN 1.72M
Stanford - Colorado ESPN 3.29M

Week 8
SMU - Temple ESPN .55M

Week 9
Syracuse - Virginia Tech ESPN .78M -Thursday

Week 10
Wake Forest - Duke ESPN .81M -Thursday
TCU - Texas Tech FS1 .62M -Thursday
Boston College - Syracuse ESPN2 1.1M -Friday

Week 11
Virginia - Louisville ESPN 1.29M
North Texas - SMU ESPN2 .62M

Week 12
Boston College - Pitt ESPN 1.03M -Thursday
Colorado - Wash St FS1 .73M -Friday

2024
Week 1
NDSU - Colorado ESPN 4.76M -Thursday
North Carolina - Minn FOX 1.06M -Thursday
Temple - # 16 Oklahoma ESPN 1.67M -Friday
TCU - Stanford ESPN 1.65M -Friday
Western Mich - Wisky FS1 .95M -Friday

Week 2
BYU - SMU ESPN2 .92M
Duke - Northwestern FS1 .51M

Week 3
Ariz St - Tex St ESPN .99M -Thursday
UNLV - Kansas ESPN 1.32M -Friday
#20 Arizona - #14 Kansas St FOX 2.58M -Friday

Week 4
#24 Illinois - #22 Nebraska FOX 4.21M
Stanford - Syracuse ESPN 1.37M

Week 5
#7 Miami - Virginia Tech ESPN 3.3M
Rutgers - Washington FOX 1.9M

Week 6
Houston - TCU ESPN
Michigan St - Oregon FOX
Syracuse - UNLV FS1
yup, we did very very well

The school is simply not marketing this team like the should and certainly not like time during Greg 1.0. Need more marketing in our home market
 
CBS figures are being withheld as the network’s contract with Nielsen has expired.


weekfivecfb.png
 
Other than the CO game, we were the most viewed game without a ranked teams and beat out a number of games on ESPN. I don't know what FOX would define as success but considering we went up against a top 10 team, we did well.
 
Given the Miami game, 1.93M is great. Every other Fox Friday game had crap on ESPN.
Sucks that we went up against Miami and an exciting game at that.....

With that said, our rating is 3rd compared to games last year on ESPN-ESPN2-FS1 Thursday/Friday games.
FOX Fridays is new this year. Seems like FOX-ESPN is making money this year....

2023
Week 1
Louisville - Georgia Tech ESPN 1.65M
Central Mich - Mich St FS1 1.06M

Week 2
Illinois - Kansas ESPN2 .7M

Week 3
Army - UTSA ESPN .92M

Week 4
Wisconsin - Purdue FS1 1.19M
NC State - Virginia ESPN 1.59M

Week 5
Louisville - NC State ESPN 1.89M
Utah - Oregon State FS1 1.28M
Cincy - BYU ESPN 1.23M

Week 6
Nebraska - Illinois FS1 1.36M
Kansas St - Okla St ESPN 2.27M

Week 7
Tulane - Memphis ESPN 1.72M
Stanford - Colorado ESPN 3.29M

Week 8
SMU - Temple ESPN .55M

Week 9
Syracuse - Virginia Tech ESPN .78M -Thursday

Week 10
Wake Forest - Duke ESPN .81M -Thursday
TCU - Texas Tech FS1 .62M -Thursday
Boston College - Syracuse ESPN2 1.1M -Friday

Week 11
Virginia - Louisville ESPN 1.29M
North Texas - SMU ESPN2 .62M

Week 12
Boston College - Pitt ESPN 1.03M -Thursday
Colorado - Wash St FS1 .73M -Friday

2024
Week 1
NDSU - Colorado ESPN 4.76M -Thursday
North Carolina - Minn FOX 1.06M -Thursday
Temple - # 16 Oklahoma ESPN 1.67M -Friday
TCU - Stanford ESPN 1.65M -Friday
Western Mich - Wisky FS1 .95M -Friday

Week 2
BYU - SMU ESPN2 .92M
Duke - Northwestern FS1 .51M

Week 3
Ariz St - Tex St ESPN .99M -Thursday
UNLV - Kansas ESPN 1.32M -Friday
#20 Arizona - #14 Kansas St FOX 2.58M -Friday

Week 4
#24 Illinois - #22 Nebraska FOX 4.21M
Stanford - Syracuse ESPN 1.37M

Week 5
#7 Miami - Virginia Tech ESPN 3.3M
Rutgers - Washington FOX 1.9M

Week 6
Houston - TCU ESPN
Michigan St - Oregon FOX
Syracuse - UNLV FS1
this is great, you should post this in round table thread as all the boobirds are having trouble with the concept of Rutgers and good
 
this is great, you should post this in round table thread as all the boobirds are having trouble with the concept of Rutgers and good

Trying way too hard to find a positive with our rating. Again, irs nothing “great” but to each their own.
 
Great compared to what?

Ohio State? Ok i agree.... We will forever be shitty..... And I assume people who make this comparison will always have a negative response....

Compared to our previous years, For sure great even if we won't be propped up by Ohio State, Michigan or Penn State.

What i am seeing is the Year on Year increase in Ratings.

2022
BTN = 8
FS1 = 2
ACCN = 1
ESPN+ = 1

2023
BTN = 8
CBS = 2
FS1 = 1
Peacock = 1

2024
BTN = 2
FOX = 2 (Both Fox Fridays)
FS1 = 1
ACCN = 1

We already have better TV Slots than previous years. Even if you consider that FOX replaced FS1 this year, we still have better slots. We are being considered for Fox Noon next week. It is either Washington at Iowa or Wisconsin at Rutgers. Hoping for an Ohio State and Michigan Wins over Iowa/Wash and Wisconsin over Purdue. And Fox is ours with a Win or close loss at Nebraska!

Our 1.93M Friday game is better than anything we did in 2022.
Shit our Howard game this year did better than our Rutgers Indiana / Rutgers Maryland in 2022. Yes you can make the excuses that our Howard game was on a Thursday, but it was a 6PM. and that the other games in 2022 had competition...... and you can choose to be blind at progress too.

Great in my opinion is what appears to be a 20% or more increase and better TV slots....
 
Better than our Prior 2 years of FS1 Games on Saturday

Iowa @ Rutgers 9/24/22 - Sat 7PM 739K
Rutgers @ Penn State 11/18/23 - Sat 12PM 765K
Rutgers @ Nebraska 10/5/24 - Sat 4PM 1.03K

I know, grasping at anything positive, but at least there aren't any negatives with regards to viewership this year.
Also beat West Virginia / Oklahoma State (634K) on ESPN2 which to me is comparable to FS1.
Ole Miss / South Carolina on ESPN in the same timeslot had 1.23M.
 
Last edited:
Our ratings have not been great this year. No matter how anyone wants to spin it
Better than previous years in similar type games on BTN.

If you only care for Leaps in ratings than i guess i will continue to expect negativity from you and other similar type posters.

But we are getting better overall ratings and better channels compared to the past 2 years.
Last year we had 5 games on BTN and one on Peacock by week 7.

Our 620K vs Wisconsin was better than our views against Temple, Virginia tech, Wagner, Michigan St, Indiana and Maryland. Only BTN Vs Michigan and Iowa had better ratings(both obvious). Shit 8 of our games were on Peacock. Only 2 games on CBS and one on FS1 as the best options we had.
 
fact is we are very low end in terms of desirable for tv

almost assuring noon kickoffs vs Minnesota and Illinois
I don't know what people expect re: TV ratings.

Yeah.. we are a very old football school.. but we did not even TRY to play at teh top level until the 70s.

We were not New Jersey's state school until the 50s.

We do not have the pedigree of any Big Ten school in terms of a football following in our own state, never mind national awareness.. which is what drives the TV ratings you see posted here as well as TV Network scheduling that would, first, assume you and get good ratings and then give you the opportunity to do so.

Just when will the whiners about ratings figure this out?

Even the SHOW of Coach Prime and Colorado is fading. But that is how an afterthought of a program can get good ratings. For us.. we need to win. I bet Indiana will get some good ratings because they are now a STORY... a curiosity.

We need to win. We need to be in the Top 25 on a regular basis. We need to win bowl games against teams with followings. Thuink of Bopisuie State.. or Gonsaga in basketball.. no one cared.. until they did.

This is how we raise our profile and recognition in the world of TV watching football fans. And that is what will driving ratings. First we will surprise networks with unexpectedly high ratings. Then they will "reward" us.. which means seek to cash in on those ratings.

Then, and only then, will the whiners here be happy about ratings.. and something tells me that even then they will complain.

There's a reason we had famously high ratings during an amazing game on a Thursday night.
- no competition
- a good story for both teams... both undefeated
 
I don't know what people expect re: TV ratings.

Yeah.. we are a very old football school.. but we did not even TRY to play at teh top level until the 70s.

We were not New Jersey's state school until the 50s.

We do not have the pedigree of any Big Ten school in terms of a football following in our own state, never mind national awareness.. which is what drives the TV ratings you see posted here as well as TV Network scheduling that would, first, assume you and get good ratings and then give you the opportunity to do so.

Just when will the whiners about ratings figure this out?

Even the SHOW of Coach Prime and Colorado is fading. But that is how an afterthought of a program can get good ratings. For us.. we need to win. I bet Indiana will get some good ratings because they are now a STORY... a curiosity.

We need to win. We need to be in the Top 25 on a regular basis. We need to win bowl games against teams with followings. Thuink of Bopisuie State.. or Gonsaga in basketball.. no one cared.. until they did.

This is how we raise our profile and recognition in the world of TV watching football fans. And that is what will driving ratings. First we will surprise networks with unexpectedly high ratings. Then they will "reward" us.. which means seek to cash in on those ratings.

Then, and only then, will the whiners here be happy about ratings.. and something tells me that even then they will complain.

There's a reason we had famously high ratings during an amazing game on a Thursday night.
- no competition
- a good story for both teams... both undefeated

Reminds me of the joke about UT. And it applies to the historic B1G as well.

It Texas somebody asks a kid:

"Where are you going to college, son?"

"Harvard."

"Gee. Didn't you get into UT Austin?"

Support for these schools, particularly athletics, go back 70-80 years. Rutgers still has some catching up to do.
 
Reminds me of the joke about UT. And it applies to the historic B1G as well.

It Texas somebody asks a kid:

"Where are you going to college, son?"

"Harvard."

"Gee. Didn't you get into UT Austin?"

Support for these schools, particularly athletics, go back 70-80 years. Rutgers still has some catching up to do.
Rutgers doesn't support alumni legacies so that is issue #1. In the South and Midwest, you have multiple generations that go to a school and that drives financial support!
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoodOl'Rutgers
Reminds me of the joke about UT. And it applies to the historic B1G as well.

It Texas somebody asks a kid:

"Where are you going to college, son?"

"Harvard."

"Gee. Didn't you get into UT Austin?"

Support for these schools, particularly athletics, go back 70-80 years. Rutgers still has some catching up to do.
Not only that. It is more complicated and worse.

Consider UCLA who we just lost to. Who is their coach? A UCLA grad.. with NFL experience. Who takes low pay in comparison to many.

What about the media that covers these other schools? Any chance they grew up fans? Any chance they were sports fans who chose to attend a sports powerhouse? Any chance their whole family, neighbors and friends did the same thing?

At Rutgers.. who chose to attend because it was a sports powerhouse?

Anyone remember Tom Luicci? He was a Rutgers grad who was a sports guy for the Targum, and, IIRC, WRSU in 1976 when we had an undefeated football team and an undefeated basketball team. He became a writer at teh state paper of record (if there was one) The Newark Star-Ledger.. that's what passes for media for Rutgers.. no NBC/CBS/ABC local TV.. they belong to New York City and Philadelphia.. very pro-sports orientation.. just like the Star-Ledger.

He held Rutgers failures against us. Even as he rooted for success.. he blasted the failures a bit too much, IMHO. And I'm sure he heard about every failure from all his colleagues.

You think the powerhouse programs or even those from states with some degree of state pride.. you think they have to put up with that?

I'm telling ya all.. Rutgers is in a very unique and unenviable position. Only consistent winning can change it. But.. we have a lot of challenges to overcome to get there.

One last aside.. Rutgers mission.. educating the state's students.. it takes it seriously and that is a good thing. It takes a lot of disadvantaged students and provides opportunities. But it will be generations before those alums from modest means would have the generational wealth that results in big donations. They have a lot of support they provide to their families and in their own neighborhoods before donating to sports becomes a priority.

And, as stated earlier.. among all Rutgers alums.. who chose Rutgers because of the sports? To support the sports?

New Jersey families producing children for whom sports are important.. where do they choose to go? You think they graduate those schools and then donate to Rutgers athletics when they become New Jersey residents?

It is a tough spot we are in. We cannot do things like other schools. We need to chart our own path.. and that is, IMHO, connecting with New Jersey and even New York businesses.. but we have to do that while winning.. striking while the iron is hot. Figure out packages that would attract the big donors. Some elite benefits.. maybe helicopter or limo transportation to games and luxury suites. We have to think BIG. Get it all set up.. network well.. then STRIKE.
 
Last edited:
Seems like ABC/ESPN has had success with the SEC so far this year. I find it interesting that UGA has had games with both Bama and Texas, when in large majority of prior years they never even played Bama (regular season).

Was that a coincidence, or was it purposefully done to make a splash in the ratings in the inaugural season of the deal?
 
Seems like ABC/ESPN has had success with the SEC so far this year. I find it interesting that UGA has had games with both Bama and Texas, when in large majority of prior years they never even played Bama (regular season).

Was that a coincidence, or was it purposefully done to make a splash in the ratings in the inaugural season of the deal?
I don't think the marketing of BIG matchups has been great at all.

ESPN has also helped inflate the rankings of SEC teams so that has helped
 
At the moment, with all the injuries, I kinda feel like maybe it'd be better to not have our games televised at all.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT