ADVERTISEMENT

OT: 2024 CFB TV ratings

Deleted the last week 11 table from sportsmediawatch. Looks like they've updated it now and also includes Michigan/Indiana numbers which was still missing from the other source.


week11-cfb.png
So tOSU’s non-competitive blowout of PU had a higher viewership than Miami’s very competitive game where they picked up their first loss.

Cable/network can account for some numbers, but result seems crazy to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
So tOSU’s non-competitive blowout of PU had a higher viewership than Miami’s very competitive game where they picked up their first loss.

Cable/network can account for some numbers, but result seems crazy to me.
That’s why Fox often picks OSU. They have solid to very good ratings regardless of who they play. They’re like 1 or 2 overall in drawing numbers.
 
So tOSU’s non-competitive blowout of PU had a higher viewership than Miami’s very competitive game where they picked up their first loss.

Cable/network can account for some numbers, but result seems crazy to me.
Miami doesn't actually generate eyeballs in fact, their numbers were behind Minnesota's last year. Quite literally, the entire state of Ohio is tuned into OSU games.

Miami's numbers will be better this year with their record and hype but not by as much as you think
 
Miami doesn't actually generate eyeballs in fact, their numbers were behind Minnesota's last year. Quite literally, the entire state of Ohio is tuned into OSU games.

Miami's numbers will be better this year with their record and hype but not by as much as you think
It wasn’t necessarily Miami specific, they just happened to be the team playing. There are 49 other states, with not all of them having a local team’s game going on.

As for someone in Ohio, the game ended 45-0. If you are at the game, sure stick it out to the end. But, watching on TV? I’d be hitting record at some point and looking for a competitive game.

Although, the whole idea of a November unbeaten team going down is a lot different starting this year, so maybe the care about seeing a team lose isn’t there. The BYU game got higher numbers than I would imagine than if they had say 1 or 2 losses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUTGERS95
Correct...

And the SECN and ACCN are not tracked because they do not pay Nielsen to track the number of viewers.

Not sure why.

And I guess BTN does...
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersguy1
not knowing what the RU/VT numbers are but with all the rest of our games, we are averaging just over 1mm which is very good and tracking higher than last year thus far

bear in mind, that is without playing OSU, PSU, Mich.

outstanding
 
  • Love
Reactions: mosito
I feel dirty for liking the Mandel posts. He can go take a flying f*ck at a rolling donut AFAIC.

However, he’s right that the playoff has increased interest in the regular season. I hope the committee gets to a point where the teams are rewarded for playing harder schedules.

With that I suggest a few tweaks.

Conferences should create schedules where teams play against other teams that finished with similar records from the prior year. For example, have the teams that finish 1-4 in the season each play two games against one another the following season.

I also think that teams ranked 1-4 in a conference play on championship week. Two teams in 16 to 18 team conferences is not enough.

I suggest that the teams ranked 3-4 play inter-conference games during championship week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
Sportsmediawatch hasn't released a week 12 table yet so here's a link to the ratings from that other source. It's not fully updated table either with some network games from Fox/NBC/CBS unavailable. The RU/Maryland game came in at 304K on FS1

 
Yea it’s always on the graphics the networks and services that aren’t covered. It’s in the fine print.
The week 12 ratings for RU Maryland are pretty bad. On par with Cal Syracuse on the CW, however, maybe because the CW is on "free TV" for most people, that gets more viewers than FS1. FFS, EMU vs. Ohio had more viewers than the Rutgers/Maryland game in the same time slot. All the Rutgers fans must have been tuning in to watch Cole Snyder play!
 
BTN seems to be a better network to be on than FS1.

I for one do tune in and look for what's on BTN before FS1
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
The week 12 ratings for RU Maryland are pretty bad. On par with Cal Syracuse on the CW, however, maybe because the CW is on "free TV" for most people, that gets more viewers than FS1. FFS, EMU vs. Ohio had more viewers than the Rutgers/Maryland game in the same time slot. All the Rutgers fans must have been tuning in to watch Cole Snyder play!
I mentioned before how bad the FS1 option is. This is where the school fails in that they need to do something about our home market. no way should we be on FS1 on our home market
 
The week 12 ratings for RU Maryland are pretty bad. On par with Cal Syracuse on the CW, however, maybe because the CW is on "free TV" for most people, that gets more viewers than FS1. FFS, EMU vs. Ohio had more viewers than the Rutgers/Maryland game in the same time slot. All the Rutgers fans must have been tuning in to watch Cole Snyder play!
Ohio vs EMU was on a Wednesday. Not the same time slot when it is different days.
 
Ohio vs EMU was on a Wednesday. Not the same time slot when it is different days.
You put down Cole Snyder every chance you get! 😜 ---that was a joke!!!
Very good point, and I missed that. No competing games that night. I still say Cole Snyder has a large Rutgers following (25% of our household watches his games). 🤣
 
You put down Cole Snyder every chance you get! 😜 ---that was a joke!!!
Very good point, and I missed that. No competing games that night. I still say Cole Snyder has a large Rutgers following (25% of our household watches his games). 🤣
I just watch whatever games are on during the early week period. #MACtion, baby!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
I just watch whatever games are on during the early week period. #MACtion, baby!
Did you watch Akron and Toledo last night? That game was torture and it went to overtime! Jason Candle was a name that used to a rising star from the MAC, but he has kind of crapped the bed lately, and this season became a train wreck for Toledo.

That game was not MACtion, it was TRACtion!!!!!

Traction Yoga Trapeze GIF by YOGABODY
 
  • Like
Reactions: rurichdog
Did you watch Akron and Toledo last night? That game was torture and it went to overtime! Jason Candle was a name that used to a rising star from the MAC, but he has kind of crapped the bed lately, and this season became a train wreck for Toledo.

That game was not MACtion, it was TRACtion!!!!!

Traction Yoga Trapeze GIF by YOGABODY
It was interesting in that Akron scored on the 1st play of the game, and dominated until late when they fell apart and Toledo stormed back in 3 possessions. An OT game that was still 50 minutes shorter than ours vs Illinois.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Knight Shift
It was interesting in that Akron scored on the 1st play of the game, and dominated until late when they fell apart and Toledo stormed back in 3 possessions. An OT game that was still 50 minutes shorter than ours vs Illinois.
I didn't notice any airhorns, Ozzy laughs, or crazy trains. At Rutgers games, those things are 50 minutes right there.
 
I mentioned before how bad the FS1 option is. This is where the school fails in that they need to do something about our home market. no way should we be on FS1 on our home market
That’s not how it works.
Fox gets to place games on FS1 as part of their rights package. Fox, CBS, and NBC all get to select a certain number of games each week. Whatever is left after this is on BTN (which also happens to be partly owned by Fox).
All of these companies are paying us (the B1G) for inventory. Some of that inventory will be on FS1 and some will be on Peacock as part of that.
 
I didn't notice any airhorns, Ozzy laughs, or crazy trains. At Rutgers games, those things are 50 minutes right there.
They had their own audio package, but I'm guessing their in-game ops crew has a clue and recognized there were 500 frozen bodies in the stadium total. Still heard The Purge siren every 3rd & 4th down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift
That’s not how it works.
Fox gets to place games on FS1 as part of their rights package. Fox, CBS, and NBC all get to select a certain number of games each week. Whatever is left after this is on BTN (which also happens to be partly owned by Fox).
All of these companies are paying us (the B1G) for inventory. Some of that inventory will be on FS1 and some will be on Peacock as part of that.
I know how it works, my comment is mostly tongue in cheek
 
I mentioned before how bad the FS1 option is. This is where the school fails in that they need to do something about our home market. no way should we be on FS1 on our home market
not even debatable
Rutgers/MD on FS1 cable TV drawing better than CW broadcast TV that's available everywhere is wild. B1G should get CW as well next contract. The more broadcast networks over cable networks the better. FS1 is available in many more households than BTN, but FS1 seems to have weaker or odd production.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigmatt718
Rutgers/MD on FS1 cable TV drawing better than CW broadcast TV that's available everywhere is wild. B1G should get CW as well next contract. The more broadcast networks over cable networks the better. FS1 is available in many more households than BTN, but FS1 seems to have weaker or odd production.
have a friend that sells ad space to the networks and I'l say it again; fs1 is a bad option to be on for a multitude of reasons I've mentioned over the years such as reach, channel selection, ad rates, etc... both schools routinely average far higher rates except when on FS1. this isn't rocket science
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT