Most of those schools are apples to oranges. Kids who are Looking at small Patriot League schools usually don’t want huge state schools. It’s a totally different college experience. Neither is wrong or right but they are very different
Agree that they are very different types of schools. The point is that state schools in the southeast, Texas and West have always attracted the best and brightest students in their area. The state schools in the northeast have not. The Midwest is a mixed bag, but state schools in the big ten have had a good reputation.
Michigan, UNC Chapel Hill, UVA, GA
Tech are the big state schools that have historically had a good reputation in the northeast.
Now, more kids from the northeast want to go to "rah rah" schools. So NC State, South Carolina, Clemson, VaTech, UGA, Florida, FSU, Ole Miss, Alabama and Auburn are more popular than they used to be. Wisconsin, Indiana, Purdue, PSU, Maryland, Pitt, WVU have had a lot of interest from NJ students for a long time.
Little Jimmy could not get into Mich, UNC, UVA so Wisc, PSU, MD got more apps from NJ, then when those schools got popular, new ones emerged. I think that objectively, there probably isn't too much of difference academically between most of these schools. The majority of the kids that go to these schools could attend any of the other schools and be successful. There is a difference in popularity. There is a difference in perception of RU, SUNY, UMass, UConn from the students in their own state. In other states, students aspire to go their State U. In the northeast, not so much. I dont think that it is right or wrong, just different perspectives in different parts of the country.