which one of the indoctrinated ones were telling us that the panel gaps didnt matter and we were making mountains out of molehills?
This is, to me, the most telling paragraph from the article:
"Once again, Tesla's ability to pass off cost-cutting measures as innovation is unmatched. Physical buttons, switches, and levers are expensive to engineer. Parts that don't move are far cheaper, and software code is even less costly. There are engineers at every automaker in the world who'd kill to have their own cost-cutting viewed nearly as favorably, and even praised, by customers."
For Tesla, having an army of sycophantic cultish worshipers is a good thing. For the worshippers, maybe not so much. But they don't care, supported as they are by the fervor of their adulation. Buy a Tesla and find it significantly devalued by a fresh round of Tesla price cuts a week later? "Thank you lord Elon, may I have another."
Lending support to the article author's statement above, contrast the Teslerati mindset with Porsche customers where, in the SUV forums, new Cayenne owners are ripping Porsche right now for
their cost-cutting measures on interiors.
The biggest (valid, IMO) complaint in those forums, at the moment, is that engaging the garage door close function (HomeLink) no longer has a dedicated physical button, it requires touching a screen. Only the screen is showing the rear camera view while backing up, so the driver has to stop the car, and switch from the rear camera view, in order to close the garage door. The function can be assigned to a physical button, but there's only one assignable physical button and multiple issues like this. Brilliant! LOL
Porsche needs to hire Elon to get in front of a camera and say "it's a unique innovative safety feature making these the safest vehicles on the planet", or some such bullshit.