Were we parked next to each other in Yellow Lot for Wisconsin game?Love my Ford Lighting. Outside of long trips, it beats my ICE in every category. Awesome for tailgate. Everyone ask me about it in the yellow lot. If you 2 car owner, one of them should be an EV.
ETA I also have it setup as a backup generator for my house. It’s not the full house setup (too expensive). It runs enough items to make it livable.
Ahem. There is a right and a wrong way of doing things. Seems Rivian has addressed the issue, and it sounds like a Tesla manufacturing defect. Therefore, it is a recall issue, like ICE vehicles with manufacturing defects. That will not stop the idiotic anti EV crowds from running with dumb narratives. Wonder if Faux news will run this story?I think @Rutgers NJ may have you on this point though. The timeline of EV's vs ICE vehicles on US roadways would certainly lead to more ICE vehicle fires. If we are looking at the last 20 years, there were probably 200x more ICE vehicle miles driven. Maybe that multiple is even much more then that.
And while an ICE vehicle being submerged in salt water probably means it is on it's way to the scrap heap, it doesn't raise the risk of car fire(well maybe slightly due to potential electrical issues) but and EV submerged in salt water does look to raise the potential for car fire significantly.
TWC mentioned it this morning, and even extended that warning to electric scooters and golf carts. And they noted the difference between fresh water and salt water, with the latter being a more serious issue.
Def not. I couldn’t make it due to a conflict.Were we parked next to each other in Yellow Lot for Wisconsin game?
I seriously doubt all cars sold in NJ will be EVs by 2035 or even 2045. I think that's become pretty clear to Murphy and his staff. The mandate is in place to help incentivize the auto industry switch to EVs. But the auto industry has been pushing back and neither Murphy nor any governor of any state can do a whole lot about it without losing their next election.Tax and spend state sticks it to EV buyers, but maintains goal of all electric by 2035. Stupid is as stupid does. However, at least there are still incentives for low income people for EV purchases, but likely most of those people do not live in private homes and easy access to EV charging will be limited.
NJ wants you to buy electric cars. So why did it kill the no-sales-tax incentive?
The Murphy administration says it wants all cars sold in New Jersey to be electric by 2035. But it just ended a big financial incentive for buyers.www.app.com
I assume this is from the federal infrastructure bill.Also, if the taxes raised by eliminating the EV sales tax savings are actually spent on infrastructure, and from what I see when out driving, there sure does seem like tons of infrastructure (road and bridge) spending taking place around NJ these days, then I'm good with it. I prefer zero government funded EV purchase incentives where the government instead funds more rapid public charging development.
The simple economics of supply and demand, which are driven by the cost and ready availability of fuel (whether the fuel is gasoline, diesel or electricity) should drive the switch over. It's been stated many times in this thread ad nauseum that hybrids with range of 40-60 miles are a great compromise. Until there is a workable grid and ready availability of public charging for people who do not have the convenience (or luxury?) of installing a charger at their home, all this government hand waving and misdirected funds will not change consumer behavior.I seriously doubt all cars sold in NJ will be EVs by 2035 or even 2045. I think that's become pretty clear to Murphy and his staff. The mandate is in place to help incentivize the auto industry switch to EVs. But the auto industry has been pushing back and neither Murphy nor any governor of any state can do a whole lot about it without losing their next election.
As I've said all along, the mandates (except perhaps in CA) are probably not a real thing.
Also, if the taxes raised by eliminating the EV sales tax savings are actually spent on infrastructure, and from what I see when out driving, there sure does seem like tons of infrastructure (road and bridge) spending taking place around NJ these days, then I'm good with it. I prefer zero government funded EV purchase incentives where the government instead funds more rapid public charging development.
Yes. Arizona is absolutely bonkers with road construction. They widened I-17 between Phoenix and Flagstaff for something like 50 miles. In all of our years (nearly 20) of driving between Phoenix and Flagstaff, there were minor bottlenecks within 10 miles of the Phoenix Metro area. But it seems many states are away with money and spending like mad.I assume this is from the federal infrastructure bill.
Agreed.The simple economics of supply and demand, which are driven by the cost and ready availability of fuel (whether the fuel is gasoline, diesel or electricity) should drive the switch over. It's been stated many times in this thread ad nauseum that hybrids with range of 40-60 miles are a great compromise. Until there is a workable grid and ready availability of public charging for people who do not have the convenience (or luxury?) of installing a charger at their home, all this government hand waving and misdirected funds will not change consumer behavior.
I assume this is from the federal infrastructure bill.
Yes. Arizona is absolutely bonkers with road construction. They widened I-17 between Phoenix and Flagstaff for something like 50 miles. In all of our years (nearly 20) of driving between Phoenix and Flagstaff, there were minor bottlenecks within 10 miles of the Phoenix Metro area. But it seems many states are away with money and spending like mad.
How so? You don’t have to hate Sawyer Merritt to recognize he’s a dumb turd. You just need to read a couple of his tweets. No hate involved.Hater.
Thanks for proving my point.How so? You don’t have to hate Sawyer Merritt to recognize he’s a dumb turd. You just need to read a couple of his tweets. No hate involved.
I personally don’t thing he’s a dumb turd, although I can certainly respect that point of view. No, I think he’s a gonad gargling sycophantic suck-up whose behavior closely resembles the behavior of a remora fish.
What’s your opinion of him? Or do you not have an opinion and just like to tossing out labels at people who see things differently than you?
His comment quoted was dumb af.Thanks for proving my point.
AOC, is allowing this but crushed Amazon from bringing in a huge amount of jobs? Priceless.
We have a plug in hybrid, and fill up once every couple of months-think it is difficult to run on "electric only." As another point of comparison, I have a 1967 Mustang that I fill up once every 9 months or longer, have never had an issue.Question for the plug in hybrid owners. Do you ever worry about gas going bad if you keep using electric only?
BTW- overwhelming answer to would you buy a Lightning again is yes. Take into account, most people on forums vent about negative things.Question for the plug in hybrid owners. Do you ever worry about gas going bad if you keep using electric only?
No surprise. But if Rivian ever figures out a 240v output, I would trade it in for R1SBTW- overwhelming answer to would you buy a Lightning again is yes. Take into account, most people on forums vent about negative things.
Would You Buy A Lightning Again?
Let’s be truthful. No BS, no sugar. Would you buy another? I ask because I still maintain my 2022 Lightning was the best Ford truck I can remember in 40 years. Solid. Yes, teething, but it was new technology. I had issues, but the biggest was range. The standard just didn’t cut it for me...www.f150lightningforum.com
Not sure I would do that. Bed is a little small, even though I only used my larger bed once or twice to do truck things. I like that the Lightning looks like a traditional pickup.No surprise. But if Rivian ever figures out a 240v output, I would trade it in for R1S
R1S is the SUVNot sure I would do that. Bed is a little small, even though I only used my larger bed once or twice to do truck things. I like that the Lightning looks like a traditional pickup.
Whoops. Any interest in the Chevy/GMC? I think they will come out with an SUV soon. Their pickups get 150 more miles of range than the Lightning. That's not of interest to me.R1S is the SUV
Oh, deer!Tesla Using 'Full Self-Driving' Hits Deer Without Slowing, Doesn't Stop
How's that computer-vision-only approach working out for you, Tesla?jalopnik.com
Do you know how many human drivers hit deer every year? This is much saferTesla Using 'Full Self-Driving' Hits Deer Without Slowing, Doesn't Stop
How's that computer-vision-only approach working out for you, Tesla?jalopnik.com
Not surprised. Although FSD has improved over time, it is nowhere near independence. FSD cannot even detect puddles of water and definitely not black ice.Tesla Using 'Full Self-Driving' Hits Deer Without Slowing, Doesn't Stop
How's that computer-vision-only approach working out for you, Tesla?jalopnik.com
I wonder that the actual stats are. Since they’re a new car company, and sales are increasing exponentially over zero, one would expect services numbers to sky rocket as cars age. At least they mentioned opening up the charging network as a catalyst to charging revenue. The sheer increase in sales would do the same.
Great salesman. Can BS his way through anything.
Great idea for people who can’t charge at home but also means people will vandalize them for no reason.Michiganders Will Get New Curbside EV Chargers Retrofitted To Existing Lamp Posts
At a time when EV charging infrastructure is still a big concern for consumers, this could be a gamechangerjalopnik.com
Sounds like a terrible scene.Fiery Tesla Crash Traps And Kills Four After Electric Doors Couldn’t Open
Five people were trapped inside a Tesla Model Y after it crashed and burst into flames, just one person escaped after onlookers smashed a windowjalopnik.com