...earlier the Pine Barrens was on the bottom of the ocean.
This is not accurate. The primary geological characteristic of the Pine Barrens is that it is alluvial, i.e. an outwash plain.
...earlier the Pine Barrens was on the bottom of the ocean.
>99% of climate scientists agree that there is human caused climate change. What are your qualifications in the subject when you "think for yourself"? Do you have any published research or active studies in this space? Or do you "feel" like you know the subject because you saw someone talking about it on YouTube or read a post on Facebook? GTFOH.Unlike most sheep today - I think for myself. While I do believe the climate is changing I have a different view of the real cause. Just 10000 years ago Southern New York was under a mile of ice - and earlier the Pine Barrens was on the bottom of the ocean. IMO mother nature is in far far more control than we are. But you believe what you want - I wont "invalidate" all your statements simply because I disagree with one of your views.
>99% of climate scientists agree that there is human caused climate change. What are your qualifications in the subject when you "think for yourself"? Do you have any published research or active studies in this space? Or do you "feel" like you know the subject because you saw someone talking about it on YouTube or read a post on Facebook? GTFOH.
there's no "advocates" here. there is scientific evidence that humans have caused some level of climate change. that is just stating fact at this point.So many times it ends up with advocates asserting it's either 100% or 0% human caused. It might be worth considering it might be both, and the percentage of neither is de minimus.
Toyota Selects North Carolina Greensboro-Randolph Site for New U.S. Automotive Battery Plant - Toyota USA Newsroom
LIBERTY, N.C. (Dec. 6, 2021) – Today, Governor Roy Cooper of North Carolina and Mayor Filmore York of Liberty, North Carolina, joined Toyota Motor North America’s leaders to announce Greensboro-Randolph Megasite has been chosen as the location for Toyota’s new $1.29 billion automotive battery...pressroom.toyota.com
I actually caught the Suburban's left front brake on fire once. Long story involving me suddenly remembering something important while going down a pretty steep hill. Driving it put the fire out. Lots of smelly smoke.Lit up the brakes on my GTI once, on some twisty in western Maryland. That was kinda cool.
I actually caught the Suburban's left front brake on fire once. Long story involving me suddenly remembering something important while going down a pretty steep hill. Driving it put the fire out. Lots of smelly smoke.
I would normally advise most people to NOT continue driving if they catch their brakes on fire. We understood our circumstances leading to the fire. Many people won't.Similar story. I got to the bottom of the road and was stopped at a light when a guy rolled up next to me and said "hey, your car's on fire." I just kinda shrugged and said "It'll go out by itself." And it did.
I suspect he told that story to a couple of people as he went on about his day.
I would normally advise most people to NOT continue driving if they catch their brakes on fire. We understood our circumstances leading to the fire. Many people won't.
If the circumstance leading to the fire is understood, and the driver can give ample non-braking driving time to cool the brakes back down, and if the driver also approaches the next few braking events cautiously, then it's probably okay to try to keep driving and put the fire out naturally.
OTOH, if the brakes catch fire when not driving and braking particularly hard, then it's likely to be a ongoing failure in the brake system causing the brake(s) to grab and overheat, or possibly some foreign object caught in a brake pad, and in that case, stopping and exiting the car is probably wise.
I opted to not take the fire extinguisher when spec'ing my last car. It's one of two options I regret not taking, the other being cosmetic. I can probably add the fire extinguisher in, but it turns out to be a bit of a PITA involving removing the passenger seat.
Are governments efficient?Musk is against govt EV spending. I thought this guy was trying to save the world?
are you for accelerated EV adoption, or just for Tesla?Are governments efficient?
Maybe he’s just for EV acceleration?are you for accelerated EV adoption, or just for Tesla?
I don't like either of these materials. give me cowhide all day long.With EVs preaching sustainability, this article about a lawsuit over interior materials (e.g. Alcantara) may be of interest to some. Nice to see a court push back against false advertising.
Alcantara Wins vs. Dinamica in Legal Squabble of the Luxury Car-Fabric Makers
The makers of competing suedelike seat material landed in an Italian court over the rights to market their products as environmentally sustainable.www.caranddriver.com
I don't like either of these materials. give me cowhide all day long.
we can make it a earned credit to have it as car upholstery...you need to eat x amount of beef to be able to have it in your car...And cows are sustainable, right? We've been sustaining them for thousands of years.
Yeah, I like leather a lot more than the faux leather. For one thing, I'm not aware of any luxury cars that offer Alcantara (or similar) with seat ventilation.I don't like either of these materials. give me cowhide all day long.
Cows are. Their farts are not, supposedly. I cannot vouch for that, personally.And cows are sustainable, right? We've been sustaining them for thousands of years.
Now you're talking.we can make it a earned credit to have it as car upholstery...you need to eat x amount of beef to be able to have it in your car...
Yeah, I like leather a lot more than the faux leather. For one thing, I'm not aware of any luxury cars that offer Alcantara (or similar) with seat ventilation.
But by all reputable accounts, good leather holds up far better than the fake suedes like Alcantara. And is easier to maintain in like-new condition.
Only the Chinese government is efficient in Musk’s eyes.Are governments efficient?
Zzzzzzz.. . this again? China and Tesla both benefit from the Shanghai factory. Are you in business? What exactly should Tesla do differently?Only the Chinese government is efficient in Musk’s eyes.
Zzzzzzz.. . this again? China and Tesla both benefit from the Shanghai factory. Are you in business? What exactly should Tesla do differently?
Thank you for acknowledging that it’s all about money. No more how Musk is trying to save the world BS. Musk doesn’t want government help other EV car makers because it hurts Tesla.Zzzzzzz.. . this again? China and Tesla both benefit from the Shanghai factory. Are you in business? What exactly should Tesla do differently?
But I thought he was the most benevolent man in the world?Thank you for acknowledging that it’s all about money. No more how Musk is trying to save the world BS. Musk doesn’t want government help other EV car makers because it hurts Tesla.
Tesla's mission statement: "Accelerate the transition to sustainable energy". Money is required to do this. Congrats on figuring that out. China happens to be the largest EV market in the world, so it makes sense to have a factory there.Thank you for acknowledging that it’s all about money. No more how Musk is trying to save the world BS. Musk doesn’t want government help other EV car makers because it hurts Tesla.
Enlighten me.Build in Latin America.
Let me know if you need more explanation.
So you're openly admitting that subsidies were helpful in getting the EV market growing, of which, Tesla was the main beneficiary...but now that Tesla has a foothold and is on a path to being a sustainable business, it's ok to close the barn door behind them? this shows that you don't actually care about the growth of EV adoption...you just care about Tesla. an alternative perspective would be to say "hey, you were able to help Tesla stand up, now it would be good for the growth of a market as a whole to ensure that there is healthy competition in the market". the health and progress of the EV market should not, and cannot be solely driven by tesla. they simply can't fulfill the global need for cars.Tesla's mission statement: "Accelerate the transition to sustainable energy". Money is required to do this. Congrats on figuring that out. China happens to be the largest EV market in the world, so it makes sense to have a factory there.
Gov. help hurts Tesla? No. Any subsidy from the government would benefit Tesla disproportionally more than anyone since they're making 2/3 of all EVs in the US. And, Tesla is in the best position for further, rapid growth. $16 billion in cash vs $2 billion of debt. They're better than ok financially.
Why do you think the new EV tax credit is taking so long to pass? Biden admin, legacy auto, and UAW are trying to figure how NOT to help Tesla. In reality, it doesn't matter. Tesla will continue on it's path of exponential growth, while they hold summits, give speeches at auto plants, and meet with lobbyists. Government efficiency at it's finest.
Tesla turns down more subsidies:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/t...t-subsidy-for-german-battery-plant-2021-11-26
So you're openly admitting that subsidies were helpful in getting the EV market growing, of which, Tesla was the main beneficiary...but now that Tesla has a foothold and is on a path to being a sustainable business, it's ok to close the barn door behind them? this shows that you don't actually care about the growth of EV adoption...you just care about Tesla. an alternative perspective would be to say "hey, you were able to help Tesla stand up, now it would be good for the growth of a market as a whole to ensure that there is healthy competition in the market". the health and progress of the EV market should not, and cannot be solely driven by tesla. they simply can't fulfill the global need for cars.
Anecdotally speaking, it made a difference to the folks I know who own one. The credit made the Tesla's more price competitive with the other cars they were considering, if not price advantageous. The fact that it is electric and saves them money on fuel and maintenance was secondary to that.Do you have evidence that subsidies increase EV adoption? I really don't know. They didn't seem to help GM. They've exhausted the original credit and they're currently producing zero EVs. Tesla buyers have been without a tax credit for 2 years and demand is currently at an all time high. There was no tax credit in place when Tesla first began selling vehicles. The original credit was a result of GM lobbying for it.
I'm all for accelerating EV adoption. Just not sure printing more money and giving it away is the correct solution.
Enlighten me.