ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Miesha Tate beats Holly Holm

rutgersdave

Hall of Famer
Jan 23, 2004
23,153
13,382
113
http://www.mmaweekly.com/hot-tweets-fighters-blow-up-twitter-after-miesha-tate-upsets-holly-holm

I didn't expect Holly Holm to lose since Tate lost twice to Rhonda Rousey. I wish I saw the fight but didn't want to stay up late just to watch it in a bar. I guess there will be several fights with big payouts rather than 1 other fight. Was this planned?

Why do the females fighters all seem to be attractive? Is it necessary to get into the MMA and is it the only reason anyone is watching the female fighters?
 
Just like Rousey was shown to be lacking in stand up skills, Holm was shown to be lacking in her ground game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drewbagel423
Chick fighting is unusually popular...kinda like lesbian porn to straight men...there was even a radio bit about it being discussed on Mike and Mike....they never talk hockey...and that's a major sport!

Weird!
 
ESPN owns Mike and Mike. NHL doesn't have a contract with ESPN. There is a reason the whole network covers it as little as possible.
 
So which of you was at ringside?

n32yCgo.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saint Puppy
Some fighters have other fighters numbers depending on style, so while I fully expect Rousey to destroy Tate, I think it will be much more of a challenge for Rousey to beat Holm in a rematch.
 
They just earlier this week did a piece on Holly Holm and her trainers on 60 Minutes Sports and as usual the kiss of death happens. She's pretty attractive in the piece especially when more feminine dressed and looking. All three mentioned above definitely bad ass and hot in there own ways.
 
Holm if she stopped working out so much and became more feminine can be very attractive.
I'd have to look again, but I do recall her shoulders & arms being too muscular, and that pretty much stopped me in my tracks so to speak. So you may be right.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT