Wait.. let me see if I get this recent line of reasoning...
JoePA & Co. looked the other way while Sandusky abused children because of the possible economic impact on the residents of Happy Valley?
Is that it?
This marks a new low in the realm of rationalizations.
No, you clearly stopped following the thread. The economic impact discussion was to show another reason why PSU would not voluntarily shut down the program.
If your summation is accurate, then I clearly did follow the thread because that was exactly my point. You are using the "economic impact" argument to avoid taking severe punishment and thus showing how JoePA & Co. would choose to hide these crimes.
You are saying that "economic impact" trumps everything.
That may be realpolitik, but it is also morally bankrupt.