ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Stock and Investment Talk

IMO, you (and a lot of people) need to start viewing blockchain simply as a tech product or service. Forget the coin crap for a second - it’s nothing but noise when it comes to applications especially once the Fed creates the digital dollar. And, nobody but developers minting coins care about decentralized anything. Ex., If Block creates a property title product using blockchain to get rid of useless title companies I don’t want or care about decentralization. Anyway, I’m mainly spit-balling here so I’m def not pretending I have all the answers. JD could have easily merged Block with Spiral if he thought the two went hand-in-hand, but he chose to keep the Spiral crypto unit separate from blockchain. And the company name is now “Block” which says a lot.
I think the decentralized nature of BTC is valued by significant number bitcoin holders. As is it's finite nature.

The digital dollar? I wonder how well received that is.

I agree blockchain technology is almost a whole other thing, and something that should be valued in it's own right. And the fact that Dorsey named the company Block does appear telling.
 
Definitely not today. The market s the bed with the "first US case" announcement. And did so on Friday as well.

The economy isn't as strong as Powell is saying, I bet he walks back the taper speed and rate increase timeline within a month or two. His comments with Yellen were more political than economic.
The downward trend definitely began before the omicron announcement.

Now as pre omicron and it's effect on the market today? I mean who really thought it wasn't going to get into the country? I agree whatever effect the first known case in the US had on the market was beyond irrational.
 
I think the decentralized nature of BTC is valued by significant number bitcoin holders. As is it's finite nature.

The digital dollar? I wonder how well received that is.

I agree blockchain technology is almost a whole other thing, and something that should be valued in it's own right. And the fact that Dorsey named the company Block does appear telling.
Can someone explain why either a Bitcoin user for transactions or a Bitcoin holder for investments give a rats’ ass whether it’s decentralized or not. If I’m an El Salvadorian using BTC to buy my groceries I’m supposed to care it’s “decentralized”? When someone on this board buys BTC to round out their investment portfolio it’s because of decentralization? By the way, if anyone takes a shot at an explanation, I understand the theory behind decentralization and mining ops, but I’m looking for the practical explanation why people other than miners or developers care.
 
Can someone explain why either a Bitcoin user for transactions or a Bitcoin holder for investments give a rats’ ass whether it’s decentralized or not. If I’m an El Salvadorian using BTC to buy my groceries I’m supposed to care it’s “decentralized”? When someone on this board buys BTC to round out their investment portfolio it’s because of decentralization? By the way, if anyone takes a shot at an explanation, I understand the theory behind decentralization and mining ops, but I’m looking for the practical explanation why people other than miners or developers care.
To me, this is all about comfort level about putting sensitive data, money, and personal property under the control of a central authority like a government or a corporation. Just look at what Facebook does with all of your data. How about a bank that does the same and that involves your money.

To me the whole purpose of decentralization is to put the power back into the hands of the user and more away from that central authority to operate in a a more stable environment on an immutable ledger, which will be the future standard or smart contracts(like you said about titles)
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-05
Can someone explain why either a Bitcoin user for transactions or a Bitcoin holder for investments give a rats’ ass whether it’s decentralized or not.
This clearly shows that you have no understanding of crypto. Do you think any nation would use BTC as a currency if the blockchain was owned and controlled by SQ or perhaps FB? Smart contracts? DeFi? Even NFTs?

If you are interested in learning about crypto, go for it. You have a long, long way to go.
 
To me, this is all about comfort level about putting sensitive data, money, and personal property under the control of a central authority like a government or a corporation. Just look at what Facebook does with all of your data. How about a bank that does the same and that involves your money.

To me the whole purpose of decentralization is to put the power back into the hands of the user and more away from that central authority to operate in a a more stable environment on an immutable ledger, which will be the future standard or smart contracts(like you said about titles)
So I personally agree with everything you said, especially about putting the power back into the hands of the user. But do most people really care? Using your FB example, after all the crap that FB n/k/a Meta has pulled its stock is still flying high and user engagement/numbers have felt little to no impact whatsoever. People simply don’t seem to care about their privacy as much as the SMEs would have us all believe. Or, at least we only care about privacy to a certain extent.
 
This clearly shows that you have no understanding of crypto. Do you think any nation would use BTC as a currency if the blockchain was owned and controlled by SQ or perhaps FB? Smart contracts? DeFi? Even NFTs?

If you are interested in learning about crypto, go for it. You have a long, long way to go.
Again, you confuse coins with technology.
And what nation are you referring to - El Salvador?!?! You do realize the BTC roll-out in El Salvador has been nothing short of an unmitigated disaster which is why you NEVER hear anything about it. Let’s see - there is ONE country that has the ONLY real transactional BTC use case. Go Google it now and look at the articles on volcano powered mining and “Bitcoin City”. It’s comical. Oh, that’s right now BTC isn’t for transactions it’s a “store of value” (thanks to Novogratz for that cute pivot once the whole transactional pitch fell flat on it’s face).
So you are telling me NFTs need decentralization? Have you seen the new NFT platform called Novel? Do you think I care that when I buy an NFT it’s on a decentralized platform? No, in fact I don’t want a decentralized platform. I want Block to run the platform so when my NFT file wont open I can call Block customer service and rip them a new a-hole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ash_Hole
Again, you confuse coins with technology.
And what nation are you referring to - El Salvador?!?! You do realize the BTC roll-out in El Salvador has been nothing short of an unmitigated disaster which is why you NEVER hear anything about it. Let’s see - there is ONE country that has the ONLY real transactional BTC use case. Go Google it now and look at the articles on volcano powered mining and “Bitcoin City”. It’s comical. Oh, that’s right now BTC isn’t for transactions it’s a “store of value” (thanks to Novogratz for that cute pivot once the whole transactional pitch fell flat on it’s face).
So you are telling me NFTs need decentralization? Have you seen the new NFT platform called Novel? Do you think I care that when I buy an NFT it’s on a decentralized platform? No, in fact I don’t want a decentralized platform. I want Block to run the platform so when my NFT file wont open I can call Block customer service and rip them a new a-hole.
Sorry, I can't explain something so obvious any differently. This is a personal journey that you need to take and figure it out.
 
So I personally agree with everything you said, especially about putting the power back into the hands of the user. But do most people really care? Using your FB example, after all the crap that FB n/k/a Meta has pulled its stock is still flying high and user engagement/numbers have felt little to no impact whatsoever. People simply don’t seem to care about their privacy as much as the SMEs would have us all believe. Or, at least we only care about privacy to a certain extent.
This is very simple...a lot of people are very uneducated about many things across the globe so this would go with your view of "why would the end user care". In the example of Facebook or even Amazon the average user has no idea what is truly being done with their data other than what they may hear in circles or potentially read somewhere but even then it is above many people's heads. The reason: because it has no material impact on them or their wallets. Yet systems like Alexa auto-default to listen to what is being spoken about so they can have people annotate to improve their Natural Language Processing to improve their products.

Now when it comes to Money and impacting you personally that is a whole different story. People become educated pretty quick when it comes to taking money away from them. That is why I think people would prefer the crypto world to reduce transaction costs, take away the manipulation aspects of a centralized party, or the ease of transferring assets again with the immutable ledger that cant be manipulated.

I have been trying to learn more about the NFT and Token Space outside of just crypto and blockchain to understand benefits or if this is all a fad. It is why I have a higher investment n ETH than in BTC right now as I believe that ETH has more use cases beyond a store of value. Again, I could be wrong here but its just what I have researched.

I just bought my first NFT the other and personally I think it is completely stupid to buy a picture and pay crazy gas fees to get one that is unique to me yet anyone can copy the picture and use it as a replica. I get the Unique ID thing but what will that really mean for something like a picture that was "minted". if you provided a Unique ID on a pair of Air Jordan Sneakers to authenticate them that is immutable, to me, that has a significant value to me so you can avoid fraud in purchasing something of value. So many aspects that protect musicians putting music out there and getting paid, etc.

Again, spending $2mm to buy a plot of land in Axie Infinity in the Metaverse...still a complete unknown and baffling understanding for me.

That said, here is a good use of BAT Token and Brave Server which helps find a problem for which we all suffer from using current web browsers with ads and speed. Again Corporations using our data to work with advertisers...$$$$

 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-05
Sorry, I can't explain something so obvious any differently. This is a personal journey that you need to take and figure it out.
The notion of decentralization is great until it becomes obvious that it simply doesn’t work in practical terms. Decentralized exchanges were supposed to allow for direct peer-to-peer cryptocurrency transactions to take place online securely and without the need for an intermediary. Well, hmmm, how’s that working out since there is exactly one third-world country using BTC, and now the BTC cartel convinced the world that it’s no longer for transactions it’s a “store of value”. And if it’s a “store of value” then decentralization doesn’t really mean anything in the grand scheme. So, FWIW, I’ve taken the journey and done the research. And I’m not even saying I’m right about any of this stuff.
 
Again, you confuse coins with technology.
And what nation are you referring to - El Salvador?!?! You do realize the BTC roll-out in El Salvador has been nothing short of an unmitigated disaster which is why you NEVER hear anything about it. Let’s see - there is ONE country that has the ONLY real transactional BTC use case. Go Google it now and look at the articles on volcano powered mining and “Bitcoin City”. It’s comical. Oh, that’s right now BTC isn’t for transactions it’s a “store of value” (thanks to Novogratz for that cute pivot once the whole transactional pitch fell flat on it’s face).
So you are telling me NFTs need decentralization? Have you seen the new NFT platform called Novel? Do you think I care that when I buy an NFT it’s on a decentralized platform? No, in fact I don’t want a decentralized platform. I want Block to run the platform so when my NFT file wont open I can call Block customer service and rip them a new a-hole.
Your NFT example is justified and after buying my first one I have been trying to learn throughout the process. It is a mess and to me seems like a pyramid scheme to raise money. No difference than the pyramid scheme I saw in HS.

There are 1,000s of these NFT communities now like Board Apes. They create a supply/demand angle by limiting the creation of say 10k NFTs in a roadmap. They create the community angle and get celebrities to join to get people to "mint" out the 10k so the price rises and people just look to make the quick buck selling them for "access". Maybe it gets you onto a Yacht with Steph Curry but how long does that last? What else besides that? You have a nice GIF file to put on your Apple Watch and make it more expensive than a Rolex for at least the remainder of 2021...now the founders of the NFTs certainly have made a ton of money and the early minters who were prob all of their friends.

I could be completely wrong but just feels that way. Now if they started minting Baseball cards yearly like this and limited to certain supply then that takes a different turn. That has value due to NIL aspects and rarity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUAldo
JPMorgan Says Buy the Dip as Omicron May Signal Pandemic Ending
  • Position for higher bond yields, rally in reopening names: JPM
  • Early reports suggest omicron may be less deadly than thought
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20 and RU-05
Bought a lot today. Omicron is most likely overblown. I am all in… at least until 2022, then might start selling some of my short term portfolio.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20
JPMorgan Says Buy the Dip as Omicron May Signal Pandemic Ending
  • Position for higher bond yields, rally in reopening names: JPM
  • Early reports suggest omicron may be less deadly than thought
Scott Gottlieb says, the more a virus mutants, the less severe it normally gets. Starting to look that way. Hope so, not just for the markets, but for society.

Regardless, get those sale prices while they last!
 
Added to PYPL and DIS.

Going to start a position in MRNA. I missed when it was recently down near $220. But it was $360 just the other day. Currently $305. ATH near $450.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20
How bout NCLH for a trade? Currently at $18. 52 week high of $34. $29 just last month. Pre covid levels around $60
 
Added to PYPL and DIS.

Going to start a position in MRNA. I missed when it was recently down near $220. But it was $360 just the other day. Currently $305. ATH near $450.
I don't know if this was posted already but read MRNA is being sued with regards to patents and their challenge to dismiss those suits was thrown out. No idea how that will all turn out and will probably take a lot of time to resolve but just as a heads up.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RUBlackout
I don't know if this was posted already but read MRNA is being sued with regards to patents and they're challenge to dismiss those suits were thrown out. No idea how that will all turn out and will probably take a lot of time to resolve but just as a heads up.
By the US Gov't correct?
 
By the US Gov't correct?
Moderna Inc could face a patent infringement lawsuit over its COVID-19 vaccine after a federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected its challenge to patents belonging to Arbutus Biopharma Corp.

The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals let stand an administrative panel's findings that Arbutus' patents, which may cover technology used in the vaccines, are not obvious in light of previously known science and so are valid.
Arbutus shares were up $1.63, or 51% higher, at $4.83. Moderna shares fell almost 9% to $321.15.

 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-05
Moderna Inc could face a patent infringement lawsuit over its COVID-19 vaccine after a federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected its challenge to patents belonging to Arbutus Biopharma Corp.

The Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals let stand an administrative panel's findings that Arbutus' patents, which may cover technology used in the vaccines, are not obvious in light of previously known science and so are valid.
Arbutus shares were up $1.63, or 51% higher, at $4.83. Moderna shares fell almost 9% to $321.15.

This will take years to settle. All pharma companies deal with such issues.
 
So another case in the US. Vaccinated. Mild symptoms, and seemingly fully recovered.
 
So another case in the US. Vaccinated. Mild symptoms, and seemingly fully recovered.
Just like all the cases in SA. Israel (with Pfizer) are analyzing their cases and so far it sounds similar. No biggie. If true, the market will flip and flip hard.
 
AI is one I'm glad I got out of. Took a loss there, and it's just about cut in half since I sold. Down another 16% today. Was up near $170 in feb. Currently at $28.

But it did beat on revs and guidance was above consensus.

MS has an underweight rating but a $45 price target.
 
AI is one I'm glad I got out of. Took a loss there, and it's just about cut in half since I sold. Down another 16% today. Was up near $170 in feb. Currently at $28.

But it did beat on revs and guidance was above consensus.

MS has an underweight rating but a $45 price target.
Agree - it was intriguing at one point but fell off a cliff. CEO sounds like an idiot on CNBC right now although he did say they have $1B in cash on hand.
 
That said, here is a good use of BAT Token and Brave Server which helps find a problem for which we all suffer from using current web browsers with ads and speed. Again Corporations using our data to work with advertisers...$$$$
I've been using Brave as my main browser for about a year now and have collected roughly $40 in BAT. In that same timeframe, Google Opinion Rewards has sent me US$90.46.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUBlackout
Agree - it was intriguing at one point but fell off a cliff. CEO sounds like an idiot on CNBC right now although he did say they have $1B in cash on hand.
Falling knife for sure, but at the very least there is a bounce trade to be had somewhere.
 
More data coming to light:

I had it on this morning, but didn't really listen.

So it was good to focus it on it here. Gottlieb has had misses in terms of some of his predictions, some big ones even, so I wouldn't take this as gospel, but he is definitely a guy whose opinion I put weight on.
 
I had it on this morning, but didn't really listen.

So it was good to focus it on it here. Gottlieb has had misses in terms of some of his predictions, some big ones even, so I wouldn't take this as gospel, but he is definitely a guy whose opinion I put weight on.
On this type of topic, he has a lot of early/inside info on the evolving omicron data (due to being on the Pfizer board). We are not sure what the data will turn up yet, but sign are starting to point in a particular direction.
 
Scaramucci on now pumping crypto.

Likes Algo as a challenger to ETH.
Everyone wants to challenge ETH. I need to create a list. Wake me up when one of these "challengers" announce they have over 2,000 developers fully funded and working on it (like ETH).
 
DKNG closing in on $30 and 52 week low. Chanos reveals short position. I’ll be the first to admit I figured sports betting would catch fire. Apparently customer acquisition/marketing bleeding theses companies dry.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT