ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Stock and Investment Talk

It's a pay site so I won't link it, but I highly recommend Jason Zweig's column "Don't Try to Ride Last Years Investing Wave" in the weekend edition of the WSJ. All would benefit as it's very well written, but some would REALLY benefit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: patk89
Overvalued at at market cap of over 800 billion? Can you provide examples? Stocks don’t usually get to that market value unless there is something there

Examples of overvalued stocks that collapsed? Well, there are plenty. I mean, look at 2000 to start. You’ll have plenty to choose from.
 
Overvalued at at market cap of over 800 billion? Can you provide examples? Stocks don’t usually get to that market value unless there is something there

From Zweig's column, although it was only a small part:

"If Tesla stock were to keep going at the same rate as it did in 2020, by the end of this year it would have a market value of roughly $6 trillion. By year-end 2022, it would be worth $51 trillion"
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy
If true, may be interesting:


So far so good:



Consider TSLA's revenue over the last 6 years.

2015 $4Billion
2016 $7B
2017 $11.7
2018 $21.4
2019 $24.6
2020 $31B(still estimated waiting on 4th qtr).

Estimated future rev's.
2021 $45B
2022 $58
2023 $69

So from 2015 to 2020 rev's were up nearly 8x. And they are expected to more then double again in 3 years. Which if true means their rev's jumped 17x in 8 years.

I point to this not as a justification for TSLA's current valuation, but moreso to note that the overall EV market has been and is expected to continue growing in leaps and bounds. Also note that TSLA's future rev's are, I would expect, factoring in the many players who are entering into, and thus competing in, the ev market.

IDRV is interesting but I imagine it is tied heavily to some companies that have risen dramatically this year.

I've mentioned this before but I like GM and Ford as EV plays.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: redking
From Zweig's column, although it was only a small part:

"If Tesla stock were to keep going at the same rate as it did in 2020, by the end of this year it would have a market value of roughly $6 trillion. By year-end 2022, it would be worth $51 trillion"
But what is the point of that? Is he arguing against people who think it will continue to rise at last years rate in upcoming years? Is anyone making that argument?
 
Yes, but the same is said of nearly all overvalued stocks before they collapse.
Yeah, but if people have predicted the stock will collapse since it was at $50, then it gets to $800 in a year, and collapses back to $400, were those initial predictions correct?
 
Yeah, but if people have predicted the stock will collapse since it was at $50, then it gets to $800 in a year, and collapses back to $400, were those initial predictions correct?

You’ll have to show where I predicted TSLA would crash at $50 per share.
 
A couple other revenue examples on the "green" trade.

RUN(solar) is up 3x since 2015.

PLUG(hydrogen) is up 3x since 2015.

PLUG's rev's expected to nearly double again by 2022.
RUN's expected to nearly double by 2023.

The recent runs are probably overdone, but there is significant revenue growth in these sectors.

On the other hand Exxon's 2021 rev's are expected to be less then their 2015 rev's.
 
Consider TSLA's revenue over the last 6 years.

2015 $4Billion
2016 $7B
2017 $11.7
2018 $21.4
2019 $24.6
2020 $31B(still estimated waiting on 4th qtr).

Estimated future earnings.
2021 $45B
2022 $58
2023 $69

So from 2015 to 2020 rev's were up nearly 8x. And they are expected to more then double again in 3 years. Which if true means their rev's jumped 17x in 8 years.

I point to this not as a justification for TSLA's current valuation, but moreso to note that the overall EV market has been and is expected to continue growing in leaps and bounds. Also note that TSLA's future rev's are, I would expect, factoring in the many players who are entering into, and thus competing in, the ev market.

IDRV is interesting but I imagine it is tied heavily to some companies that have risen dramatically this year.

I've mentioned this before but I like GM and Ford as EV plays.
IDRV is a managed ETF, so they can adjust as needed. Check out their portfolio (bottom of the page):

 
You’ll have to show where I predicted TSLA would crash at $50 per share.
I didn't say you did, I said "when people", and if you go back through the line of discussion, I think it is fair to note that people have been predicting this stock to dump forever.
 
Last edited:
IDRV is a managed ETF, so they can adjust as needed. Check out their portfolio (bottom of the page):

Just looked them up and they have an interesting group of holdings.

TSLA is the obvious, but Samsung, Apple, Intel, AMD, Qualcom, GOOGL, NVDA, Daimler.

Edit: Just noticed that your link provided the ETF'S holdings. I didn't see NIO in the list I brought up, I also forgot to mention Toyota. Those are more obvious EV holdings, not that the semi's don't make sense. AAPL and GOOGL are interesting.
 
Last edited:
Just looked them up and they have an interesting group of holdings.

TSLA is the obvious, but Samsung, Apple, Intel, AMD, Qualcom, GOOGL, NVDA, Daimler.
I'm really thinking about IDRV. If you think EVs are going to be the norm soon (likely true), this may be a good choice. iShares is a solid, legit company and their investment goal for this ETF is broad (as in, not just caremakers):

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
The iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of developed and emerging market companies that may benefit from growth and innovation in and around electric vehicles, battery technologies and autonomous driving technologies.

Why IDRV?
1. Access to companies at the forefront of self-driving and electric vehicle (EV) innovation

2. Exposure to global stocks along the full value chain of self-driving and EV industries, across sectors and geographies

3. Seek long-term growth with access to companies that can shape the global economic future
 
I didn't say you did, I said "when people", and if you go back through the line of discussion, I think it is fair to note that people have been predicting this stock to dump forever.

They might have. At a price of $50, I did not, so, you’d have to ask them,
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus20
They might have. At a price of $50, I did not, so, you’d have to ask them,
I was just following the line of discussion from @rurahrah000 's post which said this "The demise or collapse of TSLA stock has been predicted numerous times and still has not come to fruition."

But we can change my example, if people have been predicting TSLA's demise since $400, and it get's to $800 before collapsing back to $400, were those people right?
 
Consider TSLA's revenue over the last 6 years.

2015 $4Billion
2016 $7B
2017 $11.7
2018 $21.4
2019 $24.6
2020 $31B(still estimated waiting on 4th qtr).

Estimated future earnings.
2021 $45B
2022 $58
2023 $69

So from 2015 to 2020 rev's were up nearly 8x. And they are expected to more then double again in 3 years. Which if true means their rev's jumped 17x in 8 years.

I point to this not as a justification for TSLA's current valuation, but moreso to note that the overall EV market has been and is expected to continue growing in leaps and bounds. Also note that TSLA's future rev's are, I would expect, factoring in the many players who are entering into, and thus competing in, the ev market.

IDRV is interesting but I imagine it is tied heavily to some companies that have risen dramatically this year.

I've mentioned this before but I like GM and Ford as EV plays.

Just to clear this up, consensus forecasts call for net earnings for 21, 22 and 23 of $4.2bn, $6.1bn and $7.4bn, respectively.
 
I was just following the line of discussion from @rurahrah000 's post which said this "The demise or collapse of TSLA stock has been predicted numerous times and still has not come to fruition."

But we can change my example, if people have been predicting TSLA's demise since $400, and it get's to $800 before collapsing back to $400, were those people right?

This is a silly line of questions, as it all has to do with valuation and I’ve not looked at TSLA at either $50 or $400. You’ll have to find someone else to play your hypothetical. I’m not interested.
 
I'm really thinking about IDRV. If you think EVs are going to be the norm soon (likely true), this may be a good choice. iShares is a solid, legit company and their investment goal for this ETF is broad (as in, not just caremakers):

INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
The iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of developed and emerging market companies that may benefit from growth and innovation in and around electric vehicles, battery technologies and autonomous driving technologies.

Why IDRV?
1. Access to companies at the forefront of self-driving and electric vehicle (EV) innovation

2. Exposure to global stocks along the full value chain of self-driving and EV industries, across sectors and geographies

3. Seek long-term growth with access to companies that can shape the global economic future
I don't know if they will be the norm any time soon, but they are certainly growing at an impressive clip.

The one concern would be how much of that growth is already baked in? TSLA for sure, but any of those companies, NIO has been on a huge run itself.

Lot of high flyers on that list.
 
Just to clear this up, consensus forecasts call for net earnings for 21, 22 and 23 of $4.2bn, $6.1bn and $7.4bn, respectively.
I did say revenues. Edit, my bad, I said future earning, meant revs.

My point was the growth of the EV market.
 
This is a silly line of questions, as it all has to do with valuation and I’ve not looked at TSLA at either $50 or $400. You’ll have to find someone else to play your hypothetical. I’m not interested.
But you posted a story predicting the collapse of the stock price.

My questions, especially given the line of discussion above, don't seem that out of line.
 
But you posted a story predicting the collapse of the stock price.

My questions, especially given the line of discussion above, don't seem that out of line.

I posted a story about one of the best investors of the last 20 years. He is short TSLA. Anyone long is on the opposite sode of Burry. I’ve no position, but I definitely wouldn’t want to be on the other side of him. Burry thinks the stock will collapse. Is collapsing falling in half? Yes.
 
Defense stocks like NOC and GD also ran counter to the .com bubble, sank as tech rose, and then rose as tech sank.

GD looks like a pretty good buy right now.
 
With the cryptos down, i'm going to get hammered.
HA! HA! Just joking. Looking for ETHE to go under $10 and then I may pick up another coin or two. Not interested in GBTC unless it drops a lot.

Been waiting for a down day. I have some allocation moves to make. As Frida mentioned, emerging markets is a good place to be now. I'm going to slowing move my international exposure up to 10%'ish (VWIGX and EEM).
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU-05
Maybe this means precious metals will jump? That has been my theory anyways That would ease the pain a fair amount
 
What % of your portfolio is cryptos?
Including the miners, it's about 6%. Which is high, but even with a lot of trimming(although some of that moved to other cheaper crypto options) it has grown to that level. I'm up 270% on GBTC for instance. Just stupid gains.

So tomorrow is probably going to suck, but the overall has been very good.
 
Those examples point to gov't inefficiencies.

This is a private enterprise movement. GM just had a press release stating that they will have 30 new ev model by 2025. Ford is doing similar, VW, the growth of TSLA.

The EV market is expected to grow 50% next year.

We just heard the news with PLUG and SK Group.

Cummins and their hydrogen train.

I'm not saying Oil will be gone in 10 years, but green will be significantly bigger. Edit:Significantly bigger then it is now, not significantly bigger then oil.

I'll also add to the edit Amazon's commitment to electric and hydrogen(and self driving, though that is a bit of a different story).
lol ok

let's bring this up in 10yrs
 
Came across these this morning. Not my thing but for those in it.


It's going to be a bumpy ride. It will either be a strikeout or grand slam! Just seems like ETH has more utility and value in the long run.
 
It's going to be a bumpy ride. It will either be a strikeout or grand slam! Just seems like ETH has more utility and value in the long run.
Just to reiterate, historically there have been at least 7 dips of 20% or more during the last bull run of bitcoin when it last halved in 2017. The institutional investing should raise the floor.
 
Forgot to bring my phone to work, perhaps a Freudian slip, my subconscious not wanting to see the carnage of Crypto down big alongside a down overall market.

Just checked, and I'm up 1%. Near shocked, obviously pleasantly.

Helped in a big way by a 100% jump from ZOM.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT