First off, Rutgers NIL situation is fine. Is it ideal? No. Does it compare to a program like UNC hiring BB and saying they're going to give him a 20 mill budget? No, but Rutgers doesn't need to be at that level to make a freaking NCAA tournament or a bowl game.
This whole NIL thing is complete and utter nonsense of an excuse. We are 10-10 because we are a bad team, our stars are young and haven't learned how to win at this level yet, and our coaching staff hasn't figured out a way to effectively get everything to gel.
Want to say RU could use more NIL? Sure, who couldn't? You think Ohio State is turning away more NIL? No.
Just stop with this narrative that it's the end all be all, because it's NOT. Rutgers Basketball for YEARS has struggled with lesser OOC opponents even though we have a higher NIL budget than them. Even before NIL we struggled with it. This year hasn't been the exception with this program under Pike, it's been the rule.
Since you mentioned UConn, do you think Hurley with this exact same schedule and roster at RU would be 10-10? Chances are no, and extend that same questions out to all the coaches in the B1G. I mean imagine what Hoiberg would do with Ace/Dylan. That's the issue I have.