ADVERTISEMENT

Poor NIL is the biggest reason for our disappointing season

Lets knock it down and build a cavernous arena like Seton Hall has so we can tarp the top rafters and it will be like any other gym in America.

Yeah that's what I want. Screw having one of the hardest gyms to plan at in all of America.
I am not suggesting that but I don’t believe people come in there as a recruit and it’s an advantage relative to much nicer arenas that also have great atmospheres
 
The roster would look completely different.
We would play better defense.
We wouldn't have played Kennessaw State.

Ace NET NET is not moving the needle forward in terms of winning basketball games.
He is not making others better on offense (in fact he is making them worse).

Very good chance we wouldn't have Derkack and Davis

How would the roster look?
You seemed pretty certain but seem to have few details.

How is he making them worse?
The 3 Musketeers were terrible offensively prior to Rutgers/this year.

Is he causing Martini to miss shots?
He’s benching Hayes?
 
How much is Flagg getting? Harper it's known is over $2 million with fanatics and red Bull and whatever else he has. I do not contribute to NIL. I was a college basketball fan watching kids get an education, stay for 4 years and play for the school not collect $$ and move on every year.
 
The rac is not even a top 50 home court basketball facility. It’s a dump. Is it a home court advantage. Sure because it’s a dump. Is it a place where someone comes in and says wow this place is nice I want to play here. Lolololol.
Ace literally committed on the spot because of the atmosphere at that Ohio State game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salvi's Headband
Oh, the RU bball job is a very coveted job if it were to open.

- top 20 pay
- big ten rev share
- top 10 facility in america
- top 10 home court in america
- fertile recruiting grounds

This aint your fathers rutgers
yeah, I don't disagree, just saying just because the school finally decided to do it's part, you can't expect generations of abused fans to just fall in line and start pumping in more $. It will probably take a generation of people seeing RU try to be part of the solution before fans become another part.
 
The roster would look completely different.
We would play better defense.
We wouldn't have played Kennessaw State.

Ace NET NET is not moving the needle forward in terms of winning basketball games.
He is not making others better on offense (in fact he is making them worse).

Very good chance we wouldn't have Derkack and Davis

This is fantasy wish fullfillment.

There is no way of knowing if we'd have played better defense. Or if the team would be better on offense with different players.

The only player departure this might have prevented would have been Simpson, who hasn't improved at St. Joseph's this year against top competition.

We'd have had the same non-star NIL that we did this year (and possibly less without the excitement of Bailey/Harper)

We'd have had just as many new faces in the program if Bailey/Harper weren't two of them. (we would not have gotten Harper if we didn't get Bailey).

Pike's defensive approach takes time a brand new roster just didn't have.

Let's run out the "if Bailey didn't commit" line of thinking:

- No Bailey means no Harper, which means our freshman class is Sommerville, Grant, Dortch and two other random players.
- Davis may have left, and Simpson may have stayed. Needle doesn't move much.
- No Player's Era tournament and it's resultant $1M NIL payout
- No Kennesaw St game
- Mag, Woolfolk, Omoruyi, Griffiths, Chol all still leave.
- Roster would have been: Williams, Simpson, Obgole, Sommerville, Grant, Dortch, 2 freshmen... and whatever we could pick up/afford from the transfer portal.

Failing to see how we're "better off" in that situation.
 
The team right now is trending towards a national embarrassment, I don’t think we make the Big Ten tournament much less the NCAA. If you pause for a second and think about your personal expectations for the season, not making the conference tournament was likely an unfathomable outcome.

Pike is a nice guy, means well, but his efforts to build this roster and construct a functional competitive team have been a disgrace. Whether he wanted it or not, he was handed a once in a lifetime opportunity in having two lottery picks, and did about as bad a job as a coach could do.

There won’t be repercussions for him because he is owed $3.5 million a year till 2030. In March of this year he will be the new CViv holding Rutgers hostage to pay him as he destroys the program.

Pike is a nice guy, well meaning, but he has irreparably damaged the basketball program with how he has handled this season.
Thanks for making my point. “Irreparably damaged the basketball program” is a massive over-reaction.
 
I feel we need to do whatever we can to keep ahold of our current players going into next year. Keep the core and add Nware, Mark, Powers, and Nwuli. Then grab maybe 2 portal players. Then the following year do everything possible to retain that group and be competitive in 2026-27.

Pike needs year-to-year carryover with players to be successful, and NIL needs to focus on retention more than the portal.

Next year, we could be looking at:

PG: Davis (Jr), Williams (5thSr), Mark (Fr)
SG: Powers (Fr)
SF: Derkack (Sr), Nwuli (Fr)
PF: Grant (So), Dortch (So)
C: Sommerville (So), Ogbole (Sr), Ware (Fr)

And we'd look to add a portal 2/3 as a priority, and maybe even a 3/4 if we go to 13 schollies.
 
How much is Flagg getting? Harper it's known is over $2 million with fanatics and red Bull and whatever else he has. I do not contribute to NIL. I was a college basketball fan watching kids get an education, stay for 4 years and play for the school not collect $$ and move on every year.
$2.6 million
 
I feel we need to do whatever we can to keep ahold of our current players going into next year. Keep the core and add Nware, Mark, Powers, and Nwuli. Then grab maybe 2 portal players. Then the following year do everything possible to retain that group and be competitive in 2026-27.

Pike needs year-to-year carryover with players to be successful, and NIL needs to focus on retention more than the portal.

Next year, we could be looking at:

PG: Davis (Jr), Williams (5thSr), Mark (Fr)
SG: Powers (Fr)
SF: Derkack (Sr), Nwuli (Fr)
PF: Grant (So), Dortch (So)
C: Sommerville (So), Ogbole (Sr), Ware (Fr)

And we'd look to add a portal 2/3 as a priority, and maybe even a 3/4 if we go to 13 schollies.
we need a top level portal player period..a difference maker type that can score...easier said than done, if not next year will be very ugly, a second portal player needed to contribute major minutes as well
 
we need a top level portal player period..a difference maker type that can score...easier said than done, if not next year will be very ugly, a second portal player needed to contribute major minutes as well

Yes, we need a difference-making 2/3 from the portal, imo. That's the area of primary concern. Even so, I don't expect much from this team next year... we need two years of retention-focused NIL spend to get back on track and competitive in 2026-27.
 
This is fantasy wish fullfillment.

There is no way of knowing if we'd have played better defense. Or if the team would be better on offense with different players.

The only player departure this might have prevented would have been Simpson, who hasn't improved at St. Joseph's this year against top competition.

We'd have had the same non-star NIL that we did this year (and possibly less without the excitement of Bailey/Harper)

We'd have had just as many new faces in the program if Bailey/Harper weren't two of them. (we would not have gotten Harper if we didn't get Bailey).

Pike's defensive approach takes time a brand new roster just didn't have.

Let's run out the "if Bailey didn't commit" line of thinking:

- No Bailey means no Harper, which means our freshman class is Sommerville, Grant, Dortch and two other random players.
- Davis may have left, and Simpson may have stayed. Needle doesn't move much.
- No Player's Era tournament and it's resultant $1M NIL payout
- No Kennesaw St game
- Mag, Woolfolk, Omoruyi, Griffiths, Chol all still leave.
- Roster would have been: Williams, Simpson, Obgole, Sommerville, Grant, Dortch, 2 freshmen... and whatever we could pick up/afford from the transfer portal.

Failing to see how we're "better off" in that situation.
You don't think we would have been able to fish from a better pool in getting a shooting guard and wing?
 
Keep asking the same group of fans to increase donations isn't the answer.The problem is a very small percentage of alumni support Rutgers University for academics or athletics.Getting anything done like financing facilities requires decades to happen and when it does happen, the cost is far higher.College athletics in the NJ/NYC Metropolitan area doesn't get the attention found in other parts of the USA.Professional sports dominate media attention and public attendance at athletic events.In the present circumstances the only way to achieve athletic success is to hire head coaches that consistently attract players that can excel against power conference competition.Stringer did that for a short time at Rutgers, Pitino is doing a terrific job at St.Johns and Hurley at UConn has won national championships.
reading how the Towers got involved with RU and its all about access and that is the job of the athletic department and the coaches to cultivate new donors and promise them access to the program and to other aspects of the University.

Rutgers is near NYC. Its mindboggling that they cannot find corporate big wigs and multi millionaires who may be interested in being part of athletics. The Towers thing happened by accident, it wasnt Rutgers finding them. The mom and pop fans who buy season ticket holders and post on the message boards are not the donors that are going to move the needle on NIL Until Rutgers becomes aggressive with pay to play they will always be behind. The fact that Rutgers has no AD is frightening, the fact that many seem okay with an interm is even worse.
 
You don't think we would have been able to fish from a better pool in getting a shooting guard and wing?
the problem is Pike striking out with a guy like J Will...and let me tell you we also were hamstrung in the past by Hyatt as well. These were two regular sit out a year transfers that really did not help the program
 
Wisconsin lost 2 players...Storrs and Hepburn for reportedly $1 million deals elsewhere....they brought in Tomje from Colorado State and two other transfers but almost assuredly arent paying big bucks
They run an offense and a system and they appear to be held accountable (players who aren’t good enough don’t play). How often do you see Wisconsin take a bad shot, dribble aimlessly in circles, not box out, or throw a pass at a teammates feet? They probably don’t have fake captains who haven’t earned anything either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
I’ll try and reword your point.

Our top 2 players cost nearly $0(?) of Rutgers specific NIL.
Look at most other teams, I’m sure their school specific NIL had to contribute a sizable % to their top players.

Rutgers didn’t have to do that.
Nearly all Rutgers specific NIL went to players #3 and lower.

That is the immense benefit we received.

Imagine Mahomes didn’t count against the KC salary cap.
And they got all that money to direct towards improving other positions.
yes this...i dont know why people have a hard time seeing this

Rutgers didnt pay for Ace/Dylan...they got an enormous benefit and head start. Its an utter failure that even with their head start for "free" they could not cobble together a decent roster. The NIL argument really doesnt apply for this particular year....and if there is no nil at all, then why bother playing at this level, they shouldnt be in the Big 10
 
I feel we need to do whatever we can to keep ahold of our current players going into next year. Keep the core and add Nware, Mark, Powers, and Nwuli. Then grab maybe 2 portal players. Then the following year do everything possible to retain that group and be competitive in 2026-27.

Pike needs year-to-year carryover with players to be successful, and NIL needs to focus on retention more than the portal.

Next year, we could be looking at:

PG: Davis (Jr), Williams (5thSr), Mark (Fr)
SG: Powers (Fr)
SF: Derkack (Sr), Nwuli (Fr)
PF: Grant (So), Dortch (So)
C: Sommerville (So), Ogbole (Sr), Ware (Fr)

And we'd look to add a portal 2/3 as a priority, and maybe even a 3/4 if we go to 13 schollies.
Where is Peter Kiss when you need him
 
You don't think we would have been able to fish from a better pool in getting a shooting guard and wing?

I do not. The better pool was out of our price range.

We got Harper/Bailey from relationships and recruiting effort, and they came along with in-built NIL. The hype train around their arrival had some level of positive impact on the NIL available for the rest of the team - not least of which was Pike finally agreeing to a Thanksgiving tournament (Player's Era).

No Harper/Bailey, we'd have had even less NIL than we already had.... and we'd have need to replace 6 players, instead of just 4. Or we'd have had two other "need time" freshmen and have less money than we did to bring in 4 portal players.

In no universe would we have been better off without Bailey/Harper. That's silly, and "bargaining phase" talk.

We had Bailey/Harper and the rest of this class (primarily Sommerville), and we had Williams/Davis/Ogbole returning. We didn't have enough NIL to keep Omoruyi around, and we largely whiffed on the players we got out of the portal (I'd say Derkack has promise, the others have been a miss). To think we'd have had better player evaluations or more NIL money without Bailey/Harper already on the roster is not realistic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RU_SAM
Hard to argue for more NIL when we have two of the best players money can buy and are still garbage. There seems to be much larger issues at play that money won’t solve.

Would you continue to invest with a financial advisor that continues to perform below their peers? We’re dealing with a similar paradigm here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rpiseman
yes this...i dont know why people have a hard time seeing this

Rutgers didnt pay for Ace/Dylan...they got an enormous benefit and head start. Its an utter failure that even with their head start for "free" they could not cobble together a decent roster. The NIL argument really doesnt apply for this particular year....and if there is no nil at all, then why bother playing at this level, they shouldnt be in the Big 10

It of course applies for this particular year. We couldn't keep Omoruyi around, for one - he was out of our range. Could Pike have gotten Ewin instead? Probably... but that's just another new face in a sea of new faces that haven't been able to build chemistry this year.

Part of this, imo, is that Pike was looking more at "value for money" rather than "market rate" for players. The NIL market is wildly overvaluing players - no portal player is worth what they are going for. He didn't want to "overpay" for someone like Ewin... but that's what the market was demanding. Hopefully this is a lesson learned - you need to compete with hungrier teams that are willing to overpay for your players, despite their flaws.
 
the problem is Pike striking out with a guy like J Will...and let me tell you we also were hamstrung in the past by Hyatt as well. These were two regular sit out a year transfers that really did not help the program

JWill and AWill were desperation moves after Spencer/Mulcahy bailed late, well after the undergrad portal had closed. JWill was a huge risk, since we didn't even know if he'd be eligible for 2023-24 without a waiver, had the betting issue looming over his head, and was coming off a torn achilles tendon - but there were slim pickens in the portal at that point, and we had a massive hole blown through our roster after we'd thought it was largely set.
 
Also, just as an aside, NIL should have nothing to do with collectives pulling small contributions from fans. The whole point of "Name, Image, and Likeness rights" are that someone is being paid for use of their NIL for advertising or selling a product in some way. A collective begging fans to chip in nickels so that they can somehow funnel that money to players under the guise of "appearance" money or whatever, is a warped contortion of what NIL is supposed to be.

Now, I know the horse is out of the barn at this point, and NIL is just a euphemism for "let fans pay player salaries"... but the average fan is negatively impacted by $30 parking, and they can't be relied on to foot the bill for millions in player payouts.

/soapbox
 
the problem is Pike striking out with a guy like J Will...and let me tell you we also were hamstrung in the past by Hyatt as well. These were two regular sit out a year transfers that really did not help the program
JWill has been bad, like real bad. I thought he is a capable PG. I think we would have been fine with him as a PG and we would have just needed a 2 guard which are cheaper than a PG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac
You're trying to make a national championship level NIL argument for a team that isn't even sniffing the dance.

You don't need a massive NIL budget to be an average B1G team. You might need a massive NIL budget to win the NCAA Tournament, but literally no one on this forum cares about a national championship right now, we just want to freaking dance on a semi-consistent basis.

No one needs Hurley or Urban Meyer coaching Rutgers. Couldn't care less about being at that level. I'm asking for respectability and having a respected athletic department.

You're advocating throwing money at a problem that's very clearly not going to be solved by money.

You aim for a Championship and at the least you dance every year. We don’t have the resources for a massive NIL budget, but we at least need an adequate NIL budget. We clearly don’t have that when we rolled the dice on Martini, Acuff, Hayes, and Dercack.

Not throwing money at the problem, merely asking for adequate resources to succeed.


Hard to argue for more NIL when we have two of the best players money can buy and are still garbage. There seems to be much larger issues at play that money won’t solve.

Would you continue to invest with a financial advisor that continues to perform below their peers? We’re dealing with a similar paradigm here.

Get out of here. You didn’t invest anything, so talking about continuing to invest is 8 jokes in one. What we’re dealing with is most of our fans don’t do anything, but run their mouth on the messageboard. This is primarily why our roster is very weak outside the two draft picks.

However our peers are investing. MSUs players are paid a good amount, so this puts us at a competitive disadvantage.

It’s a whole new ball game. We either support, or live with mediocrity or worse. It’s a binary decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ancienthooper
RuChoppin,

Are you really rejecting that playing with 2 18 year olds that will be looking to put their numbers for the NBA draft wouldn't make a 22 year old look for a different option?
 
Also, just as an aside, NIL should have nothing to do with collectives pulling small contributions from fans. The whole point of "Name, Image, and Likeness rights" are that someone is being paid for use of their NIL for advertising or selling a product in some way. A collective begging fans to chip in nickels so that they can somehow funnel that money to players under the guise of "appearance" money or whatever, is a warped contortion of what NIL is supposed to be.

Now, I know the horse is out of the barn at this point, and NIL is just a euphemism for "let fans pay player salaries"... but the average fan is negatively impacted by $30 parking, and they can't be relied on to foot the bill for millions in player payouts.

/soapbox
It’s pay to play and always has been pay to play.
NIL is BS.

Before these payments happened under the table, which is why UConn has gotten so good at raising resources. Now everything is out in the open, so we either pony up or don’t.
 
JWill and AWill were desperation moves after Spencer/Mulcahy bailed late, well after the undergrad portal had closed. JWill was a huge risk, since we didn't even know if he'd be eligible for 2023-24 without a waiver, had the betting issue looming over his head, and was coming off a torn achilles tendon - but there were slim pickens in the portal at that point, and we had a massive hole blown through our roster after we'd thought it was largely set.
JWill and AWill were risks that didn’t pan out
 
What is the proper reaction given the opportunity and season trajectory?
You’re entitled to your own reaction. I would say disappointing, frustrating, learn from it, adapt, improve resources and get better. I would not say “national embarrassment, disgrace, irreparable damage, fire him now, find the money, Pikiell sucks, this team stinks” or the like.
 
RuChoppin,

Are you really rejecting that playing with 2 18 year olds that will be looking to put their numbers for the NBA draft wouldn't make a 22 year old look for a different option?

I'm rejecting that we'd have been able to afford a B1G-level impact 22 year old at all (let alone two of them), with even less non-Harper/Bailey NIL money.

You're talking about dropping our 2 most talented players, replacing them with 2 random HS freshmen, and hoping that we'd be able to trade two of our current portal transfers for two others.... who would be net/net better than having Bailey/Harper on the team. None of this improves retention, or chemistry, or helps get everyone playing Pikiell-style defense.... it just swaps two freshman superstars for "two portal players in our budget".

Also, Bailey was our first commit for the 2024 class (Jan 2023). There's no telling whether we'd have even gotten Sommerville (Apr 2023), Dorch (Jun 2023), or Grant (Aug 2023) without that domino falling first.
 
RuChoppin,

Are you really rejecting that playing with 2 18 year olds that will be looking to put their numbers for the NBA draft wouldn't make a 22 year old look for a different option?

Is this really the player you want:

“I don’t want to play with potential great players. I want to play with less talented players so I can do my own thing and get my own shots and numbers.”

That’s the argument you are making by targeting play don’t want to play along side potentially great players.

Why did Clif go to Alabama? To win.
He reportedly had better offers.
You don’t want players who want to win?

Sorry but “better players” generally correlates to “more winning”.
 
Ace literally committed on the spot because of the atmosphere at that Ohio State game.
The atmosphere is unbelievable when we are on.
The sightlines are as good as any in college basketball.
The Sound is electrifying.

You don’t tear down the Palestra or Cameron Indoor.

It’s the one great and unique thing we have.

Again just build a nice concourse out front and add bathrooms. It’s not that difficult.
If you must build bougie boxes put up an elevator and make boxes where the offices are. SMH why this has taken decades.

The trend is towards smaller arenas. We don’t need the soulless morgues of OSU and PSU.
 
Is this really the player you want:

“I don’t want to play with potential great players. I want to play with less talented players so I can do my own thing and get my own shots and numbers.”

That’s the argument you are making by targeting play don’t want to play along side potentially great players.

Why did Clif go to Alabama? To win.
He reportedly had better offers.
You don’t want players who want to win?

Sorry but “better players” generally correlates to “more winning”.
potentially great players is not the same as current great players.
 
The atmosphere is unbelievable when we are on.
The sightlines are as good as any in college basketball.
The Sound is electrifying.

You don’t tear down the Palestra or Cameron Indoor.

It’s the one great and unique thing we have.

Again just build a nice concourse out front and add bathrooms. It’s not that difficult.
If you must build bougie boxes put up an elevator and make boxes where the offices are. SMH why this has taken decades.

The trend is towards smaller arenas. We don’t need the soulless morgues of OSU and PSU.
@bethlehemfan is just a guy who has to take the opposite side of everything I say. Even going as far as to say the RAC is a liability for us recruiting and that the apc is a dump. He is not to be taken seriously
 
  • Like
Reactions: rpiseman
I'm rejecting that we'd have been able to afford a B1G-level impact 22 year old at all (let alone two of them), with even less non-Harper/Bailey NIL money.

You're talking about dropping our 2 most talented players, replacing them with 2 random HS freshmen, and hoping that we'd be able to trade two of our current portal transfers for two others.... who would be net/net better than having Bailey/Harper on the team. None of this improves retention, or chemistry, or helps get everyone playing Pikiell-style defense.... it just swaps two freshman superstars for "two portal players in our budget".

Also, Bailey was our first commit for the 2024 class (Jan 2023). There's no telling whether we'd have even gotten Sommerville (Apr 2023), Dorch (Jun 2023), or Grant (Aug 2023) without that domino falling first.
None of us are privy to the NIL marketplace.

I think we would have been able to get a 2 guard and a wing off the portal with the spot being open for a guy being a focal part of the offense playing in the B1G for a reduced rate.

Obviously I don't know that.

Our situation coming in to the season had to have eliminated a LOT of potential transfer targets.

If I were a 22 year old playing for a mid major and saw the tape on Ace Bailey and the shots he took I would stay way clear of RU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rutgersal
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT