It is amusing, this perception. Shelby is indifferent to Cuse on balance. Root for them underdog if v Clemson,FSU or ND. Root against them as favorites or even odds.
Allows the coaches to run the QB a little more knowing that you have an experienced backup with similar skillset. Also allows for a little more trickeration which could get you a big unexpected win or two in a season.
Funny how this transfer and Gavin have almost identical stats and you’re pinning your hopes on a player that left his program because he wasn’t guaranteed to start a bowl game.
QB Rushing TDs mostly irrelevant. Those are usually 1-2 yard stat padding dives any RB could get instead. Props for the IU TD but it’s the QB’s job to move the chains and lead long drives. Rushing yards, passing yards, passing TDs and INTsare the meaningful metrics for QBs.
Because he wasn’t guaranteed to start a bowl game? What? Minny paid a third string kid 30k and begged him to play. He was guaranteed to start for the bowl. Next year was the uncertainty which would be a given anywhere. I’m sure he left because he wanted to play in a different offensive scheme. He played for 3 OCs at Minny. Had a bond with KC and decided to come to RU. In terms of reasons to leave this one seems pretty straightforward and as far from a red flag as you can get. Kid had a better year in 2022. He wants to play for the guy who got more out of him. What’s wrong with that?
I think one of the reasons that Minny had a high drop rate is that Kaliakmanis has no touch on his throws, at least in the games that I saw. He throws fastballs even when the receiver is only 5 - 10 yards away. He'll need to improve on his touch.
This is absolutely the correct answer. Let the chips fall where they may, and where the coaches decide. It's a fun debate, but all of this drop % don't mean squat until the two QBs are put side by side and the coaches make a decision on who gives RU the best chance to win. Even with that, the debate will not end here, which is good, because it means we have a fanbase that wants us to win, or at least "their" QB to win. I never committed that sin. 😉
And the 2nd string QB will be best :-)
Yes he did. But my joke was that he did actually throw I believe 3 pick sixes (maybe just the 2).
Should be noted that it was 53.1% vs 47.8%. At least according to ESPN. Looks like there was some fudging going on there by the original poster.
I think it's very fair to say he had a bond with KC, but saying he had a better frosh season looks like a stretch.
It’s also insurance if the 1st string QB gets injured.
You can’t have a top 100 receiver if you don’t have a qb that gets him the ball. You can’t have one without the other.It does if you know basic football (and most people here dont know what a passing tree is)
RU had no top 100 WRs - its top 5 WRs had 7 TDs combined (none good at contested balls)
Minnesota's Daniel Jackson had 8 TDs by himself
RU's top WR had 463 yds and 3 TDS - also career totals for 5 years.
The Muggles like to blame Wimsatt despite Schiano and Media telling everyone last summer that WR spot was a weakness and it was.
Monmouth transfer Dymere Miller is Jerry Rice compared to what RU had this year
Rutgers Scarlet Knights 2023 College Football Players Stats - ESPN
Get the full Players stats for the 2023 Rutgers Scarlet Knights on ESPN. Includes team statistics for scoring, passing rushing and offense.www.espn.com
Yeah don’t think so, incumbent is a funny word.
GW to WR? Can’t take your post seriously with that one.
We all know the next QB commit is really “the one”.
Or, Minnesota was 9-4 in 2022 vs 6-7 in 2023. He just played on a better team with better supporting cast.
