So, are you saying it would have been a poor coaching decision by Flood to insert Rettig in those games against great defenses just to see what he could do?
We already knew what CL was doing, there's no reason to believe Rettig would fare better is a bad answer…lets find out is a better answer.
So, are you saying it would have been a poor coaching decision by Flood to insert Rettig in those games against great defenses just to see what he could do?
We already knew what CL was doing, there's no reason to believe Rettig would fare better is a bad answer…lets find out is a better answer.
First, I commend Chris for his toughness, he was put in a lot of bad situations and fought hard." there's no reason to believe Rettig would fare better is a bad answer...lets find out is a better answer."
And This is just your opinion on what is the better answer.
What if Rettig was put in during the second quarter of a game that was still in doubt and proceeded to throw multiple INT's. If you knew that our coach had information that indicated Rettig had a problem with INT's when under duress, would you have wanted to put him out there to just see what happens? I wouldn't.
Soo basically people wanted our coach to play Rettig just so they could see with their own eyes what he could do. I don't want a coach making decisions based on fans wishes. I want him playing the players he feel will be the best, based on all the information. Most of which we don't have.
" there's no reason to believe Rettig would fare better is a bad answer...lets find out is a better answer."
And This is just your opinion on what is the better answer.
What if Rettig was put in during the second quarter of a game that was still in doubt and proceeded to throw multiple INT's. If you knew that our coach had information that indicated Rettig had a problem with INT's when under duress, would you have wanted to put him out there to just see what happens? I wouldn't.
Soo basically people wanted our coach to play Rettig just so they could see with their own eyes what he could do. I don't want a coach making decisions based on fans wishes. I want him playing the players he feel will be the best, based on all the information. Most of which we don't have.
Apparently, his job.First, I commend Chris for his toughness, he was put in a lot of bad situations and fought hard.
The issue with your argument, of course, is every time Rettig got on the field, he delivered at least one big play. When you go five games, or whatever it was, without a TD pass and you see the back up come in a throw NFL type spirals, you can't help but scratch your head and wonder what might happen if he were given a chance. The offense ran the ball well all year. A deep passing attack would have complemented that a lot better than the dink and dunk for ll the reasons already discussed. Rettig offered the ability to play a different style offense, relying more on deeper throws, similar to Nova. Chris can't do that. So, it's fine to try to design an offense around one QB's strengths but when you realize that you can't win with it, you have to try something else. What do you have to lose?
First, I commend Chris for his toughness, he was put in a lot of bad situations and fought hard.
The issue with your argument, of course, is every time Rettig got on the field, he delivered at least one big play. When you go five games, or whatever it was, without a TD pass and you see the back up come in a throw NFL type spirals, you can't help but scratch your head and wonder what might happen if he were given a chance.
The offense ran the ball well all year. A deep passing attack would have complemented that a lot better than the dink and dunk for all the reasons already discussed. So, it's fine to try to design an offense around one QB's strengths but when you realize that you can't win with it, you have to try something else. What do you have to lose?
You must be correct. Practically 100% of the posts he has made on this board all season are to defend Laviano and Flood's handling of the QB position and to put down Rettig. There was one last night talking about seniors leaving Houston's offense after this season and comparing it to RU's after last season. That's it. Zero posts on the coaching situation, be it the termination of Flood or possible candidates for the job.That you continually refuse to understand this, quite honestly, makes me think you're either Chris Laviano or a member of his or Flood's family. No doubt, because otherwise you're a complete moron, and I'd like to think that's not the case.
because flood has such a track record of success, huh?" there's no reason to believe Rettig would fare better is a bad answer...lets find out is a better answer."
And This is just your opinion on what is the better answer.
What if Rettig was put in during the second quarter of a game that was still in doubt and proceeded to throw multiple INT's. If you knew that our coach had information that indicated Rettig had a problem with INT's when under duress, would you have wanted to put him out there to just see what happens? I wouldn't.
Soo basically people wanted our coach to play Rettig just so they could see with their own eyes what he could do. I don't want a coach making decisions based on fans wishes. I want him playing the players he feel will be the best, based on all the information. Most of which we don't have.
That was one hell of a season considering everything that this team had going against it, combined with the tough schedule. It has to take a lot to keep coming back for more every day, and I for one, greatly appreciate it.
And an even bigger shout out for playing for Rutgers when you know guys like Spare130(featured below) are in the crowd rooting against you. That takes a maturity, composure, and class that most won't find in multiple lifetimes. Kudos again!
Honestly, what did people really expect from a young first year starting QB behind an O Line that gave up a sack at a rate of 7.5% per every pass attempt (3rd worse in the big ten)
For the 4 toughest defenses RU played this year:
Wisconsin gave up 6 TD passes all year;____0.5 TD's per game____0 for CL
Michigan Gave up 7 TD passes all year; ___0.6 TD's per game____0 for CL
OSU 12 all year:_____ 1 TD per game___0 for CL
MSU 17 all year : ____ 1.4 per game_____3 For CL
So these 4 opponents allowed a combined 42 passing TD's all year = 0.875 TD per game
In Lavianos 4 games against these opponents .75 TD’s per game
In 7 of their games this year Wisconsin did not allow a TD pass.
In 5 of their games this year Michigan did not allow a TD pass.
So against these four opponents, Laviano was just slightly below the average of TD passes per game (.88 vs .75 TD per game)
And Laviano was clearly in the company of many other QB's in not throwing a TD in games against UW and UM this year. And against MSU 2 teams had zero TD passes this year, where CL had 3.
How much better did anyone really expect him to be? Still amazed at the expectations.
I agree/ Love your toughness and fight through adversity!That was one hell of a season considering everything that this team had going against it, combined with the tough schedule. It has to take a lot to keep coming back for more every day, and I for one, greatly appreciate it.
And an even bigger shout out for playing for Rutgers when you know guys like Spare130(featured below) are in the crowd rooting against you. That takes a maturity, composure, and class that most won't find in multiple lifetimes. Kudos again!