Where did they not work out? He had a winning record everywhere.
At TN, he went 5-7, then 7-6, 9-4, 9-4, 4-6 (fired). Total stats: 34-27 over 5 seasons. His conference record in the SEC wasn't great, but they haven't done any better since he left either. And he managed to win conference championships 4 times. Winning is habit forming and elusive. But he did it.
To compare, Schiano never won anything. Was only 1 game over .500 lifetime, and well under .500 in conference play (Big East, not SEC). He had a full 11 years and in his last four, was under .500 in conference.
So... neither coach was perfect. But one seemed to objectively do better. And one is more offensive minded, which would be a nice change after Schiano and Ash (discounting Flood who had no pedigree to speak of).
Don't get me wrong, I'd like to hire Urban Meyer and pay him whatever it takes. But I don't think that's realistic.
Now you're just trolling. Let's look at some facts...
- Jones was 34-27 at a top ten all-tie program that's won multiple national championships and his record is, apart from Dudley's before him, the worst of any TN coach since about 1960 - and he won no championships in the SEC, despite your implication he did. Given every advantage in the world being at a storied program, he did worse than Schiano did over his last 7 years.
- As I've said a few times now, but which you keep ignoring, his first 2 championships were in the 2nd tier MAC (i.e., who cares?) and his second 2 were at Cincy, but his teams weren't good enough to win the BE BCS bid, meaning, again, who cares?
- Schiano's 2006 season was better than any year Jones has ever had, by a decent margin.
- Jones was 34-27 (56%)/14-24 (37%) at TN, while Schiano, over his last 7 years (after reviving the program from the ashes - no, not those Ashes), was 56-33 (63%)/25-24 (51%), i.e., Schiano did much better. Even if you throw in the Cincy years, Jones was 57-41 (58%)/26-33 (44%), which is still worse than Schiano's last 7 years.