I'd say the fact that Yeboah was on campus is a good indicator that they.want a grad transfer.
Moreover there's a certain intangible quality to recruiting momentum and turning Rutgers into a place that players want to come to. If Pikiell can't bring in guys he legitimately wants (and all indicates are he wants Yeboah) coming off an improved season with the practice facility opening... Then I think that's a legitimate concern. Not a "omg he should be fired" concern but it's not nothing.
Ultimately the recruiting class will be judged later, not now. But after holding an open scholarship last year and having two open into late April I don't think it's crazy to discuss how the recruiting strategy is working. Far as I can tell Pikiell zeroes in on the guys he wants and is relentless. Sometimes it works (Mathis, Mulcahy) and sometimes it doesn't (Hyatt, Massoud). But it's absolutely worth talking about doing things this way vs. the Seton Hall (in on nearly every transfer) or Kansas State (they cast a wide, wide net in terms of offering high schoolers, not always commitable of course) method.
The Issa thing definitely blindsided them but it's college basketball. You've always got to be ready for roster turnover.
I think you are misinterpreting the entire process. There's a facinating item with grad transfers and transfers which I get. A program that is familiar with a player or has recruiting ties to an AAU program, should consider those options.
RU has always had kids on campus reported and unreported when the guidelines allow so. If we reported on every kid that hit the RAC, heads would spin.
I believe RU has room for 2 players obviously. What I am saying is the same thing last year, I would rather invest in a grad transfer that fits the culture and doesn't require a huge amount of impact to the path of the development of the freshman or underclassmen.
Many disagreed with me last spring and we wanted a lot of names that visited and went elsewhere....and at the end of the season, it appears to me (and many others) that this past season, set the table.
We improved because of playing talented freshman and sophs. Any grad transfer has to find room at the 4 over Eugene or the 5 over Myles....or at the 4 as a compliment to Eugene or the 5 as a compliment to Myles.
I am not stating that we shouldn't have competition at positions, but we have depth for the 1st time in over a decade. Teams typically play a max of 9 or 10 kids. If Yeboah beats out Eugene or Eugene is fine as a 6th man, great....if we play small for segments of games, great.
If Eugene goes down for a 3rd year in a row, I would love Yeboah....as insurance across multiple spots.
There's a sincere lack of confidence engrained in a lot of our fanbase....a lot of it is warranted and in most cases it is historically driven.
My concerns are not regarding player development or this new revamped staff, facility, Pike or what's been done. The larger looming question is much bigger than Yeboah.
The larger question is can RU get to an NCAA level, competing with the slime, sleaze and level of competition behind the scenes, to recruit at a high enough level to sustain winning. Yeboah just fits the profile of a player without a typical price tag that comes with most recruits.
And until RU gets to the next level, will the batch of recruits with character and without a price tag, continue to pick or come to RU...or does RU eventually have to enter the rat race of the Pittsburgh, LSU'S of the world to keep up with the Joneses.
I can assure you that if we landed a Massoud or Hyatt or if other recruits at that caliber weren't steered elsewhere, we wouldn't be concerned one bit about a grad transfer.