It appears the SEC is so strong that Alabama and Florida can lose at home to Ole Miss and Missouri and only drop 2 spots. The SEC NET rankings will be ridiculously high this year and almost nothing will happen in conference to change that.
And KennesawRoot hard for Hall, Princeton, and Columbia rest of the way
Damn!! That’s it?
I can’t see them getting to Q2 or dipping to Q4And Kennesaw
Still it was not rewarded like a big road win. When you are anywhere from 8.5 to 9.5 underdogs and you win the game outright , the jump in any model should be greater than 3 spots. Especially since the Kenpom offensive efficiency in 2 games went from 109 to 113. That is a huge leap. This NET formula is still weird.The hole they dug was extremely deep
4-8 vs Q1/2/3 is very problematic in addition to close margins of victories to bad teams
I can’t see them getting to Q2 or dipping to Q4
Well we went up 3 spots in T-Rank as well and like 4 spots in Kenpom? Not really sure what you are expecting.Still it was not rewarded like a big road win. When you are anywhere from 8.5 to 9.5 underdogs and you win the game outright , the jump in any model should be greater than 3 spots. Especially since the Kenpom offensive efficiency in 2 games went from 109 to 113. That is a huge leap. This NET formula is still weird.
Secondary teams losing St. Peter’s , Merrimack hurt I guess but Monmouth and Kennesaw won.
Like I said the NET formula is weird.
Still it was not rewarded like a big road win. When you are anywhere from 8.5 to 9.5 underdogs and you win the game outright , the jump in any model should be greater than 3 spots. Especially since the Kenpom offensive efficiency in 2 games went from 109 to 113. That is a huge leap. This NET formula is still weird.
Secondary teams losing St. Peter’s , Merrimack hurt I guess but Monmouth and Kennesaw won.
Like I said the NET formula is weird.
Just what I said. A 8-9 point underdog winning outright deserves a larger bump. Not even taking into account we broke their 20 game home winning streak. Which is not a component of any model but speaks volumes to how great a win it was.Well we went up 3 spots in T-Rank as well and like 4 spots in Kenpom? Not really sure what you are expecting.
Exactly what I thought.Still it was not rewarded like a big road win. When you are anywhere from 8.5 to 9.5 underdogs and you win the game outright , the jump in any model should be greater than 3 spots. Especially since the Kenpom offensive efficiency in 2 games went from 109 to 113. That is a huge leap. This NET formula is still weird.
Secondary teams losing St. Peter’s , Merrimack hurt I guess but Monmouth and Kennesaw won.
Like I said the NET formula is weird.
Our Kenpom not moving has a lot to do with our porous defense . But our offensive efficiency went from 109 two games ago to 113. Huge jump as we are now 65.The Ken Pom is 83 as well so it lines up
WAB in the 100s last week is now 82
Our Kenpom not moving has a lot to do with our porous defense . But our offensive efficiency went from 109 two games ago to 113. Huge jump as we are now 65.
It doesn't "deserve" anything; it's just math.Just what I said. A 8-9 point underdog winning outright deserves a larger bump. Not even taking into account we broke their 20 game home winning streak. Which is not a component of any model but speaks volumes to how great a win it was.
Huge NET jump 17 places on their home floor with a great buzzer beater. They are the lowest BIG 10 team so that jump was huge to stay a Quad 3 for now but plenty of time left and we do not play them until the last game of the year.Also Minnesota up to 120 is huge. Now i expect them to likely slide a bit again but them being a Q3 game as opposed to Q4 is a big factor. Have to make sure that q123 mark is above 500. All our games left will be. 4-8 plus 9-4 gets us to 13-12 before any big 10 tournament game. Yes there are exceptions but you want to be 500 or above when all is said and done
Yep and i believe their one point loss to Ohio State also gave them a decent bump priorHuge NET jump 17 places on their home floor with a great buzzer beater. They are the lowest BIG 10 team so that jump was huge to stay a Quad 3 for now but plenty of time left and we do not play them until the last game of the year.
The thing I posted above is also why top ranked teams often don't drop as much as people think they should after losses; the gap between teams is often larger as you get towards the top (or bottom).
For example in Kenpom the difference between #1 and #10 is a whopping 11 rating points which is the same as the difference between us (#83) and #25. So Auburn could lose to a crappy team by 100 and still not drop out of the top 10 most likely.
Alabama and Florida lost on their home floors 2 nights ago and only dropped 2 spots in the NET. The NET is especially forgiving any losses inside the SEC.The thing I posted above is also why top ranked teams often don't drop as much as people think they should after losses; the gap between teams is often larger as you get towards the top (or bottom).
For example in Kenpom the difference between #1 and #10 is a whopping 11 rating points which is the same as the difference between us (#83) and #25. So Auburn could lose to a crappy team by 100 and still not drop out of the top 10 most likely.
You have complete control over what play, who gets the ball, what spot on the floor they want it. You absolutely practice every situation that can come up late on games(you should). .I'm not saying I think they will annex 6 Q1 wins. I don't even think we'll be over .500 overall to be honest. But if you get to 18 wins that includes 6 more Q1s at least (with current rankings).
It's not luck, but it's something you have minimal control over the result of a single trial.
If someone is a 45% 3 point shooter and they nail a game winner, that isn't "luck". But they're only going to hit it 45% of the time. The difference between the times they do and the times they don't... I mean luck is not really the right word but it's variance and it's not really under their control.
You practice to get to 45%. You don't practice to guarantee you will make it in whatever the most important situation is.
Anyway, yes Schiano's timeout was stupid I guess but it's silly to view that as the one thing that lost the game.
I can’t see them getting to Q2 or dipping to Q4
Sure thing sparky.You have complete control over what play, who gets the ball, what spot on the floor they want it. You absolutely practice every situation that can come up late on games(you should). .
You practice to reduce the “variance” and insure you have the greatest chance of success.
Every single play matters and the decisions made in crucial moments are the difference between winning and losing.. if you don’t believe or understand that ONE play and decisions made for that play are the difference then we fire every coach.
You can sit in the sideline and just give out probability numbers.
Pike had a great game last night but he almost gave away last nights game with 30 secs to go. Awful coaching decision. One play matters!
best offensive game ever (under Pike and probably past 20 years)According to Breitman, we had our best offensive efficiency game all year (over 1.3) but our worst defensive efficiency game of the year.
Best since 07-08 when Torvik's site starts and it's not even close (adj O 147.2, I don't think there is another one over 140)best offensive game ever (under Pike and probably past 20 years)
Lipscomb and mid and low major teams like them will fall significantly with every future loss.It doesn't "deserve" anything; it's just math.
If you look at kenpom for example, we are a +10.22 (after the game). We had already played 17 games or about 1,190 possessions.
So let's say you are +10 for 1,190 possessions and then you perform 12 points better than expected (i.e. win by 3 when you are a 9 point underdog) over ~70 possessions. That's +15.71 points per 100 more than expected i.e. 70 possessions of +25.71 performance.
Now your average is roughly (1190*10 + 70*25.71)/1260 = +10.87.
So your rating increased by 0.87. Here is our current kenpom neighborhood:
Yale +10.48
Wake Forest +10.47
Drake +10.29
Liberty +10.27
Libscomb +10.23
Rutgers +10.22
TCU +9.56
Colorado St +9.54
Washington St +9.02
Bradley +8.89
Butler +8.73
Again this is after the game and you will notice there is somewhat of a gap under us and things are a bit spread out there; so if we were at like +9.4 before the game we would only jump 2 teams there. But another game with the same jump would see us jump like 12 spots up to #71. It depends what the actual ratings are around you and not just your rank.
Looks like the 2020 game against Illinois was the next highest at 137.3. That was the Young and Harper show (24 and 28 points), Miles Johnson pulled in 6 ORB against Kofi Cockburn, and they had a 58.1% FT rate. Illinois was an elite defensive team (8th) which led to a 13 point adjustment.Best since 07-08 when Torvik's site starts and it's not even close (adj O 147.2, I don't think there is another one over 140)
The most Rutgers thing ever would be turning this season around, going 8-4 and then playing Minnesota last game in a must win game and losing that game……I have seen that movie before. In all honesty, I might take that scenario as we would at least be watching meaningful basketball the rest of the way.Also Minnesota up to 120 is huge. Now i expect them to likely slide a bit again but them being a Q3 game as opposed to Q4 is a big factor. Have to make sure that q123 mark is above 500. All our games left will be. 4-8 plus 9-4 gets us to 13-12 before any big 10 tournament game. Yes there are exceptions but you want to be 500 or above when all is said and done
Road opportunities are littered all over the schedule. Maryland, Northwestern, Washington are road games that if you want to steal into the win column, would help the metrics. Those 3 games mixed with a Nebraska road win, could help offset the Harper absence at Indiana and not close to 100% vs Wisconsin and Purdue.@ Mich, @Oregon and @ Purdue are the 3 we’d all say are most certain losses, but a win at any of those will really push the needle