I see post-season tourney performance as a tie-breaker among otherwise equal teams on the bubble.I am starting to believe post season torunament runs mean very little
I see post-season tourney performance as a tie-breaker among otherwise equal teams on the bubble.I am starting to believe post season torunament runs mean very little
Well if the NCAA committee sees Rutgers and Team B … you know which way that goes. I just look forward to them playing solid, complimentary basketball down the stretch. Time for us to be wearing those Ruby Red Addidas .I am starting to believe post season torunament runs mean very little
per the rules I believe the top 2 schools in the power 6 are given the opportunities to host games.BAC.....since NIT is going away with win your regular season you are in....do you think NIT goes back to the monetization model and tries to pick teams to host games and hope to get them to MSG?
Bac said 15th team outWell I say general vicinity. If we are 10-10 we will be in the conversation. That doesn't mean we actually get in though.
Feels like the exact inverse of where we were 12 months ago… maybe we’re due lolSmells like we need to go 7-2 rest of the way. 1% chance feels right. Need to get that offensive needle moved to 1.00 PPP, that is a HUGE ask.
the ncaa is a pipe dream. RU doesnt have the resume for it. To even get on the bubble RU would have to go 7-2 the rest of the way and they would need to win at either Purdue or Wisconsin while beating Wisconsin at home.Well if the NCAA committee sees Rutgers and Team B … you know which way that goes. I just look forward to them playing solid, complimentary basketball down the stretch. Time for us to be wearing those Ruby Red Addidas .
we simply wont have the resume....are we winning at Purdue and sweeping WisconsinTeamcast for Rutgers - Customizable College Basketball Tempo Free Stats - T-Rank
T-Rank College Basketball Ratings and Rankings. And fun.www.barttorvik.com
bart doesnt like us....we are out if we finish 8-1
They also don't like Gonzaga. That will be a very interesting one to watch
Sounds good, let’s do it.the ncaa is a pipe dream. RU doesnt have the resume for it. To even get on the bubble RU would have to go 7-2 the rest of the way and they would need to win at either Purdue or Wisconsin while beating Wisconsin at home.
I am starting to believe post season torunament runs mean very little
you and I both know this conversation is a waste of time...we are improved with Jeremiah back, but we are still at best an average B1G team.we simply wont have the resume....are we winning at Purdue and sweeping Wisconsin
they are at least on the board but a 361 non conference sos likely dooms them. Going to need to stack quality wins. Right now they do have 3 very good wins...Michigan State, NW, Nebby but those are all at home. 9 of their 15 wins are in Q4Minnesota just beat MSU. Quietly sneaking way into NCAA tourney conversation.
We would be in bc they would factor in how amazing we were once JWill was backyou and I both know this conversation is a waste of time...we are improved with Jeremiah back, but we are still at best an average B1G team.
We didn't get in at 19-14 with a high 200s OOC but were the 1st one out
Wouldn't you think at 20-13 (1-1 B1G) and a low 100s OOC we would get in?
Do you think the committee is that much of a slave to NET?
we do not have the resume at 19-12...to entertain a serious discussion, they have to finish 20-11. The middle part of the Big 10 is mediocre. The only true marquee wins are Illinois, Purdue, Wisconsin. Mich St pretty good, NW/Nebby better to the eye test than on paper.....after those 6 though none of those games move any needles. How many games does RU have vs those 6....they have 5 and then 4 more vs the weaker. Even if 3 gets more Q1 win and beats the other 4 where do they standyou and I both know this conversation is a waste of time...we are improved with Jeremiah back, but we are still at best an average B1G team.
We didn't get in at 19-14 with a high 200s OOC but were the 1st one out
Wouldn't you think at 20-13 (1-1 B1G) and a low 100s OOC we would get in?
Do you think the committee is that much of a slave to NET?
I dont see it as a factor unless we are 20-11We would be in bc they would factor in how amazing we were once JWill was back
our q1 number would eliminate us right off the bat at 10-10Well I say general vicinity. If we are 10-10 we will be in the conversation. That doesn't mean we actually get in though.
we will be on the bubble board sure but well off the in lineNot at 10-10. People here said we won’t be on the bubble with that record
you or anyone else should not be talking about the bubble. We are currently 1-8 in Quad 1 which will be 1-7 soon as Ohio State on road moves to Q2 their next game. We beat a team that lost 10 of 11 and another team not in ncaa contention who has similar offensive woes. Win the next 2 and then we talk Ncaa and bubbleobviously pending what the bubble looks like.
You said 15th out . That is not bubble territorywe will be on the bubble board sure but well off the in line
the fact that we are saying win 2 games and we can discuss makes me feel goodyou or anyone else should not be talking about the bubble. We are currently 1-8 in Quad 1 which will be 1-7 soon as Ohio State on road moves to Q2 their next game. We beat a team that lost 10 of 11 and another team not in ncaa contention who has similar offensive woes. Win the next 2 and then we talk Ncaa and bubble
5 is a pretty good bet right nowobviously pending what the bubble looks like.
How is the committee going to look at the Mountain West Conference?
Would they possibly put 5 of those teams in?
there are many schools on the board for consideration, so yesYou said 15th out . That is not bubble territory
I know it’s not supposed to matter , but I would think San Diego State’s run last year helps the conference this year5 is a pretty good bet right now
15th team out of Dayton is not on anyone’s bubble . Not even Palmthere are many schools on the board for consideration, so yes
There’s also a feasible world where Maryland jumps back into Q1. I feel like five Q1 wins, especially if 3 are on the road, is a competitive markour q1 number would eliminate us right off the bat at 10-10
yet there could be a scenario where they only get 3....or as many as 65 is a pretty good bet right now
CONF | #TEAMS |
---|---|
B12 | 10 |
SEC | 7 |
B10 | 6 |
ACC | 5 |
BE | 5 |
MWC | 5 |
P12 | 4 |
WCC | 2 |
perhaps but I am already putting Minnesota into Quad 1 and them losing to RU would hurt that standingThere’s also a feasible world where Maryland jumps back into Q1. I feel like five Q1 wins, especially if 3 are on the road, is a competitive mark
that looks good. I have not jumped too deep on any conference right now other than the Big 10 which has very little chance to get more than 6I know you aren't a bart fan because of the reliance on WAB
CONF #TEAMS B12 10 SEC 7 B10 6 ACC 5 BE 5 MWC 5 P12 4 WCC 2
and byu but why central florida..waste IMOI have been living under a rock.....Houston is in the B12!
it's called the Tacko Fall effectand byu but why central florida..waste IMO
Committee puts in who they want and then points to a specific criterion to justify .The committee uses "last 10 games" as a criterion right? Asking for a friend.
That’s fair. I do think 11-9 is the record needed to truly be close.Well I say general vicinity. If we are 10-10 we will be in the conversation. That doesn't mean we actually get in though.