Offseason plan for Pike to get back on track
- By RUfanEsq
- The Round Table
- 88 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
They played the bulk of the minutes 2 years ago, the only other player who played reasonable minutes beyond Spencer and Mulcahy was Simpson. Unless you count Jalen Miller.
The defense was very high level 2 years ago, but we also finished games with point totals at 45 or in the 50s, hoping to hold teams under 60 or 65 points. Then the fans complained we didn't have enough shooters, when in reality, we just didn't have complete guards who can do everything (Geo Baker, Jacob Young prototypes).
The numbers are not better anyway you look at RUs 5th guard to Iowa, Maryland or Wisconsin.....and most schools play 3 guards while MSU and UCLA have a more traditional SF and PF....(1) threes that are made by players who don’t play a lot of minutes are still worth 3 points - excluding Hayes’ threes for example makes no sense
(2) threes that are made by players not listed as “G” are still worth three points - excluding Bailey for example is insane
Rutgers is not good from three but the data here is tortured in order to make it look worse than it is
I don't think they will be in the six man rotation all season. I think it will be more of a swingman role, depending on off days. Maybe get 15-20 starts for the season.As they're going with the 6 man rotation I think Peterson is safe.
1. Senga
2. Manaea
3. Peterson
4. Montas
5. Holmes
6. Blackburn/Canning/Megill
Losers of #6 go to pen as long man in that Trevor Williams role. The other I'm not so sure. If it's Megill he might be better in a setup role.
I'm also not sure if Blackburn will be fully healthy to begin the season unless I missed something on that.
The Iowa Sandfort brothers have over 100 made 3s to Bailey's 40 or so 3s and the 30 combined by Martini and Grant.....if I include the wings, would it make you feel better???
They played the bulk of the minutes 2 years ago, the only other player who played reasonable minutes beyond Spencer and Mulcahy was Simpson. Unless you count Jalen Miller.Especially when Mag and McConnell are then mentioned as not contributing enough threes. Neither of those guys were primary guards for us.
I think this analogy is strained. Would I hire Vick for a veterinary practice? Nope. But as a football coach? I think there is enough separation from the nature of his crime.In regard to Vick doing his time etc…
There are pedifiles who have done their time and they are not allowed to teach our children. No matter how great a student they were themselves and qualified for the job.
What he did to defenseless dogs is not just a heat of the moment type of thing. He bred dogs to die for entertainment. That mindset is not something that just gets better. And even if it does, the fact is, he did it. He just should not be a leader of young men.
The Iowa Sandfort brothers have over 100 made 3s to Bailey's 40 or so 3s and the 30 combined by Martini and Grant.....if I include the wings, would it make you feel better???(1) threes that are made by players who don’t play a lot of minutes are still worth 3 points - excluding Hayes’ threes for example makes no sense
(2) threes that are made by players not listed as “G” are still worth three points - excluding Bailey for example is insane
Rutgers is not good from three but the data here is tortured in order to make it look worse than it is
Maybe. But on the other hand, maybe he is pitching for his spot on the Opening Day roster. He and Megill are still optionable. Their competition for rotation spots (Blackburn and Canning) are not.Peterson to me already proved he's the real deal. He pitched many great games. I consider him a #2 at worse.
What does MATH stand forWhy can’t you hear a pteradactyl in the bathroom?
Because the p is silent. On