No matter how many times one tries to rationalize it, Princeton still, in my view, has a much better body of work than ND. We beat ND. We didn’t beat Princeton. So despite a couple one point losses to NC State and company, I’m simply not buying it. If you are comparing 2 resumes - one has a win over Princeton and the other has a win over ND, the Princeton win should be viewed more favorably in assessing win quality. NET says otherwise.
Princeton has virtually no body of work. They have two decent wins over Rutgers and St. Joe's, and just 3 Q2 games (zero Q1 games). They've lost to Wright State, Texas State, Furman, and Loyola-Chicago. They've also won nail biters against really bad Harvard, Dartmouth, Iona, Northeastern, and Monmouth teams. They have a 4-3 Q3 record.
Notre Dame won all their games against bad teams comfortably. They only have one decent win (Georgetown), but have faced 5 Q1 and 3 Q2 teams.
Neither team is very good - but I wouldn't say Princeton was the tougher team. On a neutral court, I'd rather face Princeton again than Notre Dame again.
And pretty much every metric other than RPI agrees.... and RPI has Princeton at 68 (just no) and Notre Dame at 183 (also no).