This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

RUChoppin said:

Princeton has virtually no body of work. They have two decent wins over Rutgers and St. Joe's, and just 3 Q2 games (zero Q1 games). They've lost to Wright State, Texas State, Furman, and Loyola-Chicago. They've also won nail biters against really bad Harvard, Dartmouth, Iona, Northeastern, and Monmouth teams. They have a 4-3 Q3 record.

Notre Dame won all their games against bad teams comfortably. They only have one decent win (Georgetown), but have faced 5 Q1 and 3 Q2 teams.

Neither team is very good - but I wouldn't say Princeton was the tougher team. On a neutral court, I'd rather face Princeton again than Notre Dame again.

And pretty much every metric other than RPI agrees.... and RPI has Princeton at 68 (just no) and Notre Dame at 183 (also no).

Click to expand...

Take a closer look. I don’t think Princeton is good but compared to ND they are. Your entirely going by brand names as the very quad system you are preaching sorts most of Princeton’s opponents fairly similarly to NDs ( ACC stinks). Both teams are 6-0 vs Q4. Again - Princeton is 4-3 vs Q3 while ND is 1-3. Princeton is 2-1 vs Q2 while ND is 1-3. Your right - ND went 0-4 vs Q1 while Princeton didn’t play any Q1s. So basically what your saying is getting blown out once, and losing by 11, 9 and 4 to top teams is not only better than going 3-0 vs Q3 instead, but it’s so much better that it even makes up for having a 2-6 record vs Q2-Q3 compared to Princeton’s 6-4 record.

Hope Dylan is 100% and Ace plays composed--anything less and this game could be ugly.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

e5fdny said:

Wasn’t one of Tim Howard’s best attributes his overall athleticism? I remember reading how he would have been a major level talent in whatever he chose.

Click to expand...

I remember Howard playing in high school in North Brunswick. He actually did not play goalkeeper for them. He played as a field player. They’re starting goalie ended up playing at Rutgers.

I got to train with him because we had the same goalkeeper coach back in the day and I remember watching in awe as he was able to get his hips almost parallel to the crossbar.

Last year our so cold home game at the garden welcomed Michigan band and cheerleaders. I better not see any of that nonsense this year

DHajekRC84 said:

sorry, as usual you're completely either missing the point or purposely putting your head in the sand. Being a loss leader and eating 50% to the tune of $70 million are two completely different things and you know that. I bet 100% YOU don't manage your finances that way. Then again perhaps you're one of those people who don't care if the car depreciates 25% the day you drive it off the lot.

Click to expand...

Once again, you’re frightened because you don’t understand the way things work and lack financial context. Athletic Department economics are different from your home economics and the fact that you would try to equate the two shows you are out of your depth, here. The Athletic Department revenue is never going to match the Athletic expenses. Too many sports lose money hand over fist. Competing in the Big Ten takes a great deal of resources and that’s why the AD will always lose money.
There will always be a difference and Rutgers will make it up. The President is on record saying so.

At others schools like Michigan, Penn State, and Ohio State, Football is a Cash Cow and subsidizes the entire Athletic Department. At Rutgers, Football is a loss leader because our revenue base is too small.

Nevertheless, A 70 million dollar loss from the Rutgers Athletics Budget out of a 5.4 Billion Dollar Rutgers budget isn’t even a rounding error. So your concern is quite frankly laughable, and ultimately the loss is a nothing burger.

And Guess what, Rutgers actually improved its Overall Net Position by $217M. This Total Revenue - Total Expenses, for the University.

So you and everyone else need to chill out. Sargeant wrote an article to get clicks and he got clicks. Here’s Rutgers Financial Statements for last year.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Go Rutgers!

KidDagger said:

Illinois slightly favored.. tons of tossups, would be awesome if we could pull out this win.. would need a total team effort. Wonder if we will have Barbosa going at 165 for this match.

Click to expand...

Does he still have his redshirt available? Or is he over limit

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

cm_13 said:

Lathan may have been a 4 like 10 years ago, he’s not now.

Click to expand...

Yeah, 4s aren’t a thing anymore in high major ball. It’s all shooters, distributors and 5s. And since he can’t defend, he doesn’t have much upside beyond what you already see. I don’t think he’s going anywhere.

NickRU714 said:

I believe 2025 freshman recruiting is completed.
We have 4 recruits signed.

TheKnightReport

The definitive source for all Rutgers news.

rutgers.rivals.com

Click to expand...

Hopefully players we can convince to stick around

RU205 said:

multiple reasons. We are from NJ and she wants to live on campus but she doesn’t want to travel too far from home. Her older sister is currently a sophomore at RU and doing well academically and socially. We have also discussed finances and in state costs are around $33k-$35k compared to traveling out of state for a minimum $55k. If she is at Ru she can graduate without taking on debt.

Click to expand...

I wish our son had gone to RU out of HS, but he wanted to go to school in NYC and went to the New School; he ended up liking being in NYC, but didn't love the school so he transferred to RU, which obviously cost us a lot less. He got a degree in history and then his masters in information/data science (RU's program is top 5 in that) and is doing very well at a data-driven startup in his first 3.5 years in the real world, with 2 promotions already. He loved his time at RU.

UCLA by45